Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.

Community Voices features opinion pieces from a wide variety of authors and perspectives. (Submission Guidelines)

Minimum wage: $15 an hour would help close income disparities and lessen food insecurity

There is no other policy proposal on the table that would do as much to address the injustices of the racialized economic system in Minneapolis.

The $15-an-hour minimum wage would be an important first step in addressing the racialized economic disparities that plague the city of Minneapolis.
MinnPost photo by Peter Callaghan

Last year, the Minneapolis City Council commissioned a study on the potential impacts of adopting a $15-an-hour minimum wage. On Oct. 5, the findings of that study were presented to the council. Overall, the report presents an optimistic view of the proposed wage increase.

The authors of the report are experts in the field of economics. Samuel L. Myers, William Sprigs, and Monica Garcia Perez all hold Ph.D.s and have taught at universities around the country, including the University of Minnesota, St. Cloud University, Howard University, and Rutgers. The research their report draws on is peer-reviewed (the gold standard for academic publishing) and their chosen methodology is well defended in the report.

The study’s findings show multiple positive outcomes that would be achieved by adopting a $15-an-hour minimum wage.

A first step in addressing disparities

First, the $15-an-hour minimum wage would be an important first step in addressing the racialized economic disparities that plague the city of Minneapolis. The impact of the wage increase would be most felt in Minneapolis’ black and Hispanic communities. That’s because 41 percent of black workers and 54 percent of Hispanic workers are in the kinds of low-wage positions that would be affected by a higher minimum wage. In contrast, only 17 percent of white workers would be affected.

Article continues after advertisement

To be clear, the wage increase would benefit low-income workers of all racial backgrounds. But because employment practices are deeply racialized in Minneapolis, the benefits of the minimum wage increase would impact blacks and Hispanics the most.

If the City Council is serious about addressing the deep and significant economic inequality in this city between racialized groups, the $15-an-hour minimum wage has to be a part of that process. There is no other policy proposal on the table that would do as much to address the injustices of the racialized economic system in Minneapolis.

$15 an hour would lessen food insecurity

Second, the minimum wage increase would significantly reduce the number of families in the metropolitan area struggling with food insecurity. Right now, there are thousands of families in the area who are “food insecure,” meaning they regularly run out of money for food before they are able to buy more. They are forced to skip meals and suffer from hunger because they do not earn enough money to be able to feed themselves and their families.

Increasing the minimum wage to $15 an hour would lessen food insecurity in the region by 6.9 percent. It would make 17,000 households in the region food secure. That’s 17,000 working families that would no longer have to experience hunger; 17,000 sets of parents who would no longer have to skip meals to make sure their children eat; 17,000 households with children who would have the proper nourishment to grow and develop. These numbers — and the families they represent — are not insignificant.  

The study also predicts many additional positive impacts of the proposed wage increase: 

  • There are 19,000 households in which adults are working, and still not making enough money to escape poverty. The wage increase would positively impact 73 percent of these households.
  • There are 68,000 workers in Minneapolis in their prime adult working years who are earning so little that they cannot afford to buy basic necessities, let alone save for retirement. The wage increase would help these workers meet their needs.
  • The wage increase would help immigrant families, impacting 29 percent of workers who have already naturalized and 39 percent of workers who have not yet become citizens.

While I could continue going on about the positive findings in the report, I want to avoid talking about the issue of the $15-an-hour minimum wage in only abstract terms. Because the report is predictive and the families and workers it describes are presented as simply numbers and statistics, it’s easy to lose sight of what it at stake in the fight for $15.

‘So much would change’

Instead, I would ask that we consider the experience of Virginia, a low-wage worker who cleans buildings downtown. She’s had her job for five years and makes $9 an hour. She supports her family of five with the wages she earns.

When I spoke with Virginia, she told me, “$9 really doesn’t make it for all of the bills — between gas and electricity and water and all the other bills. So, we have to stretch those $9 as much as we can to make it work.”

“So much would change,” she said, if she earned a $15 an hour wage. “Children need many things. They need bread. They need eggs. They need fish. They need to be able to eat.” For Virginia and her family, the wages she earns are not enough to feed her children sufficiently. An increase in wages would mean that she could provide them with what they need to grow and thrive.

Article continues after advertisement

Virginia and I talked about the fact that some people have said that $15 is too much to pay workers. She rejects this idea. “$15 [an hour] would barely cover all the expenses we have to pay for. I don’t think it’s too much to ask for. There’s a lot of poor, working, humble families that are working hard.” These workers deserve to be able to take care of their families and have joy in their lives.

I’ve included my conversation with Virginia here because I want to make clear the stakes of this struggle to raise the minimum wage. When reading economic policy reports it is easy to lose sight of the people represented in the reports’ figures. It’s easy to overlook their experiences and stories.

Hard work, all over the city

It is important that we remember that the numbers discussed in the report refer to actual working people and actual struggling families. These are workers who are doing hard work for low wages. They are working in schools throughout the city. They are providing care for the elderly and incapacitated. They work in construction, manufacturing, and janitorial services. Low-wage workers are providing the services that make more affluent people’s lives comfortable and convenient.

It’s past time that we address the widespread racialized economic disparities in Minneapolis. And it is unconscionable that we have working families that are suffering from being unable to buy enough to eat. These are both issues that the proposed $15-an-hour minimum wage would positively impact. The Minneapolis City Council must act now.

Kathleen Cole, Ph.D., is an assistant professor in the Department of Social Science at Metropolitan State University. Her views do not necessarily represent the views of her employer. 


If you’re interested in joining the discussion, add your voice to the Comment section below — or consider writing a letter or a longer-form Community Voices commentary. (For more information about Community Voices, email Susan Albright at