Officially, the Great Recession ended in June 2009. In technical terms, that means the economy began growing again the next month, in July, even if that growth was relatively small.
Unofficially, the recession continued to drag down households for many months — if not years — after its official end. Income, jobs, housing — the slow economic pace of the recession’s aftermath touched many aspects of life. This was true for the country, and it was most certainly true here in Minnesota.
In the decade since the official end of the Great Recession, how has our state fared economically? Below, we take a look at some data to answer this question and to examine how pocketbook-related racial disparities have changed over the past decade.
Minnesota from 30,000 feet
At a macro level, our state is faring relatively well on a range of economic and financial measures: The economy continues to grow; income is rising; jobs are plentiful; and labor force participation is increasing.
Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a measure of our state’s economic output, reached nearly $306 billion in 2017, up nearly $50 billion since 2009. Median household income has been steadily creeping up, hitting $68,400 in 2017. The number of jobs available has increased to 2.9 million, roughly a quarter-million more than in 2009. And the proportion of adults working now stands at 79 percent, up from 75 percent in 2009.
Furthermore, the share of households paying too much for housing has declined. Across the state, 26 percent of households in 2017 paid more than a third of their income in monthly housing costs, down from 34 percent in 2009. That’s the good news.
The bad news is we’ve also seen things stay the same, or worsen, on a couple of measures of economic well-being. Minnesota’s poverty rate remains stubbornly high, measuring 10 percent in 2017. And rates of homeownership are trending downward.
Unfortunately, the story gets uglier.
Minnesota from 300 feet
At a more micro level, our state isn’t performing well on range of measures, especially when we disaggregate data by race. One such measure is median household income. Minnesota’s black population saw their income increase to $38,100 in 2017, a jump of nearly $7,500 from 2009, outpacing the $5,000 increase for all of Minnesota. But median household income among black households was the lowest in the state in 2009. Median household income for American Indians was also low, at $38,700 in 2009 and, despite generally positive economic tailwinds, household income stagnated over the course of the same period.
Poverty is another measure that reveals substantial disparities across Minnesota’s racial and ethnic groups. While rates have declined for all racial groups over the past decade, only white Minnesotans have a poverty rate below the state average. All other racial and ethnic groups have higher rates. American Indian and black residents have the highest levels of poverty, at 29 percent and 28 percent, respectively. And the poverty rate of Minnesota’s Hispanic population, though considerably lower than American Indian and black populations, is still nearly double the state average.
Homeownership, too, reveals measurable disparity. Although rates dipped modestly across the state between 2009 and 2017, the current gaps between homeowners of color and white homeowners remain large. For instance, the rates of homeownership among Hispanic and American Indian households, at 46 percent and 40 percent, respectively, are considerably lower than white homeownership rates, which sit at 77 percent. But even starker is the rate of homeownership among black households. At 24 percent, black homeownership is three times lower than the rate of homeownership of white households. That gap is both massive and alarming.
Finally, across the state, housing costs are burdensome for a considerably larger percentage of households of color than for white Minnesotans. Despite falling 9 percentage points since the end of the recession, to 40 percent in 2017, the share of households of color that are housing cost burdened is considerably larger than white households, 23 percent of whom pay more than 30 percent of their income for housing.
Without parity, can we say we’ve made progress?
We could cheer the gains and positive movement in the economy that Minnesota overall has enjoyed since the end of the Great Recession. After all, at a high level, our state has fared relatively well on a few economic measures — GDP, job growth, and labor participation, for example. But would our note of self-congratulations gloss over an uglier truth?
Because other pocketbook indicators tell us a different story. When we examine more closely data related to median household income, poverty, homeownership, and housing costs, we see that the far worse starting positions for Minnesota’s populations of color lay stark the disparities that persist in our state.
Such large disparities by race remain a steady and prevailing trend in Minnesota — a trend predating the Great Recession — and until those gaps narrow considerably, it’s inaccurate to conclude that the progress our state has made has delivered for everyone.
Narrowing the gap
Minnesota had more than 142,000 job vacancies during the second quarter of 2018. We need to fill these openings with our pool of talent, including those people currently seeking employment and those who, for a multitude of reasons, are not. Together with our next generation of workers, our state can nurture an economy that moves toward racial income and employment parity.
- Minnesota Compass, which tracks disparities by race (as well as by income, gender, and geography) for many of our state’s quality-of-life indicators. Visit our Disparities section to explore this data and to access our Racial Equity Resource Directory, where you can learn about programs and training providers that work to combat racism and increase cultural competence.
- GreaterMSP, which seeks to strengthen the regional economy both by attracting businesses and workers to the region and by retaining those people who already live here. It tracks metrics related to economic and social outcomes.
For those who want to learn about and get involved with organizations seeking to address economic and financial disparity, visit:
- The Center for Economic Inclusion, which recognizes that the region’s wealth and prosperity depend on the economic success of all Minnesotans. It employs a variety of strategies to advance inclusive growth and provides ample evidence for why inclusive growth is fundamental to our future economic well-being.
- The Minneapolis Saint Paul Regional Workforce Innovation Network (MSPWin), which seeks to strengthen the workforce in the seven-county metropolitan region by creating proven career pathways for individuals seeking to improve their financial positions. With a goal of assisting individuals develop a family-supporting career, MSPWin works with employers, educators, and individuals themselves to streamline a path to successful, gainful, and meaningful employment.
This article from the Minnesota Compass website is republished with permission. Allison Liuzzi, project director of Minnesota Compass, works with a team of researchers to describe and measure progress on topics related to our shared quality of life in Minnesota. She has particular interest in demographic trends, employment and workforce development, and immigration. Jacob Wascalus is a research scientist on the Minnesota Compass team. He generates and curates content for the Minnesota Compass website and manages a portfolio of related research projects.
WANT TO ADD YOUR VOICE?
If you’re interested in joining the discussion, add your voice to the Comment section below — or consider writing a letter or a longer-form Community Voices commentary. (For more information about Community Voices, see our Submission Guidelines.)