Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.

Donate

Community Voices features opinion pieces from a wide variety of authors and perspectives. (Submission Guidelines)

Why do so many Americans crave what we consider to be ‘elite’ status?

Marquette U podium
REUTERS/Darren Hauck
That which drives so many of us to try to obtain what we consider elite is something we should figure out.

As the college cheating scandal continues to anger much of a nation, news that one of the involved actresses is unwilling to plead guilty to charges of wrongdoing and another accepts guilt while fearing prison makes me (and I would guess a whole lot of other people) think there is much more involved beyond tremendously privileged people wanting and expecting even more privilege. I could be wrong, but I’m thinking that the enormous matter of what so many of us consider to be “elite,” and why so many of us value such status so very much, is yet to be more fully discussed. Including why many of us in far less gilded circumstances will do almost anything within our greatest means to achieve elite ranking. Or buy it.

This scandal has made me think about what a beloved professor told me many years ago when I told him I was transferring from Milwaukee’s Marquette University to the University of Minnesota. He knew I was from what was then called a “prosperous working class” family, one with enough income to not qualify for most of the non-loan financial aid that existed at the time but not enough to allow me to go to a school like Marquette without living at home and working an exhausting but fairly lucrative job every weekend and summer. Along with passing on most of the interesting, often very expensive things that mark life at a renowned private university. He also knew that I had chosen to make those sacrifices for nearly two years in order to attempt to obtain the sort of “elite” education that was either not possible for, or desired by, most of the people in much of the United States. Then and now.

‘A world few of your social class will enter’

I can still feel my professor jab my hand from across the table after I broke the news. And then he said, in the gravest voice I’d ever heard him use: “I mostly understand why you are doing this, even though I think you might be making a mistake. Make sure you know that you might be leaving a place that could have afforded you easier admission to a world few of your social class will enter.” He went on to say he would talk to a few of his fellow professors who had taken their doctorates at Minnesota to have them give me transition counsel.

As it was, I made the transfer and got what I considered to be a pretty good education in Minneapolis. I had fewer small classes than I did at Marquette and made far fewer friends, since many of the people I talked to in class were living the life I had lived at Marquette, that of go to school and run to the library for a bit of study before going home. But I didn’t have to work weekends anymore as I got a nice job on-campus with a group of economists, a job I firmly believe helped me develop skills and even connections that I might have gotten through Marquette’s involved alumni chapters and networks.

I took classes that were more available at large universities (e.g., reading the Icelandic sagas, a course which helped me when I wrote my Iceland-oriented novel years later). The lack of personal attention in class meant any success or failure I encountered was on me. All on me. At first, I was scared out of my mind and often felt odd (and sometimes exotic) being a Catholic among so many Lutherans of Scandinavian descent who scarcely asked questions in class. But it mostly worked.


‘Not elite enough’

And when I went to Washington years later, the person who hired me for my political appointee position at the U.S. Department of Education said “I like it that you went to Marquette but I also like it that you graduated from Minnesota. I always think people, especially in this town, wrongly think of public universities as not elite enough.”

photo of article author
Mary Stanik
When I got the job the very next day, I felt very elite. To be sure, a place like Washington, D.C., was full of people who had gone to the sorts of private schools the wealthy and somewhat wealthy consider necessary to a life worth living. But any sense of inferiority I may have felt among my  Education Department colleagues had little to do with the fact that I had graduated from a public university. The gentle teasing I received upon occasion from my East Coast co-workers came from being from the “honest, simple” part of the country that imparted touches of a Canadian-like accent (so they felt) over my native Great Lakes twang. But that’s for another discussion.

Still, that which drives so many of us to try to obtain what we consider elite is something we should figure out. Especially since higher education of any sort is already difficult to obtain for too many in this country who can barely manage tuition at a community college, much less any sleek rowing photos or bribes.

Far too many.

Mary Stanik, a writer and public-relations professional, lives in St. Paul. She is the author of the novel “Life Erupted.”

WANT TO ADD YOUR VOICE?

If you’re interested in joining the discussion, add your voice to the Comment section below — or consider writing a letter or a longer-form Community Voices commentary. (For more information about Community Voices, email Susan Albright at salbright@minnpost.com.)

Comments (6)

  1. Submitted by Paul Udstrand on 06/18/2019 - 08:54 am.

    What’s funny is of all the developed nations the US has had the lowest level of class mobility over the last 40 years, we’re pretty much stuck where we’re born.

    Another thing that’s always been funny is the fact that Americans tend to overestimate their own affluence comparatively. Something like 60% of Americans believe they’re in the top 20% income bracket. By and large Americans have no idea how wealthy the wealthy REALLY are. You see this when we talk about raising taxes on the wealthy, people who make $150k a year think THEY’RE “wealthy”, people don’t realize that we’re talking about folks who make $150k an HOUR, most people don’t realize that such earners even exist.

  2. Submitted by Paul Udstrand on 06/18/2019 - 08:55 am.

    I have to say however that Stanik’s thesis is fundamentally flawed because she’s not writing about people who want to be elite, she’s writing about the elite taking advantage of their privilege and wealth. This college cheating scandal isn’t about average people wanting join or appear to be members of the “elite”… they ARE the elite, and they’re spending their elite “capital” on their kids. This scandal isn’t about people who crave status, it’s about people who already HAVE the status using it to promote their children. It’s about entitlement and privilege, it’s not about upward mobility.

  3. Submitted by Jon Kingstad on 06/18/2019 - 05:44 pm.

    One of the most subjective and self-regarding measure of class and merit in America is the US News and World Report’s ranking of institutions of higher education. A bachelor’s degree is pretty much the same from any accredited institution across the country but we’ve been told and apparently believe strongly that a degree from Harvard, Yale, Princeton or some other “elite” school is intrinsically “better” than one from a Midwestern land grant university or liberal arts college. And it seems that graduates of these “elite” schools do indeed have greater success in achieving status of wealth, power and influence. A graduate of these “elite” schools is almost by definition a member of the “elite”. Which then becomes the evidence which proves that the US News & World Report rankings of these universities as “elite” is objectively true and correct.

    It keeps on being published, people read about it and repeat it among themselves and they want their children to become an “elite” even if they themselves resent anyone who is “elite.” But class and snobbery do not exist in America.

  4. Submitted by Hiram Foster on 06/19/2019 - 05:54 am.

    Why do we see others claiming elite status? Why are we so worried that someone might be condescending to us?

  5. Submitted by Paul Udstrand on 06/19/2019 - 08:13 am.

    Again, this scandal isn’t about anyone “craving” elite status, they ARE the the elite. The scandal itself IS an expression of elitism, entitlement, and privilege. These are elite parents assuming that their kids are entitled to go the colleges they want to go to, whether they qualify or not. None of these kids are depending on their college educations to acquire elite status, they’re ALL already there. This is just elite parents throwing their money around. By definition you had to be “elite” to even participate in this scandal.

    Ms. Stanik is asking us to pretend that the elite are just like everyone else, and the rest of us just wish we were one of them. F. Scot Fitzgerald would beg to differ. There IS such a thing as “integrity”, and a lot of people value it.

  6. Submitted by William Hunter Duncan on 06/19/2019 - 08:16 am.

    This is the “greatest” empire in the history of the world, Pax Americana. Of course many desire to rise in it’s ranks. That is the story of empire, and the story of civilizational collapse and the collapse of empire; that an elite cohort consolidates power, becoming ever more insular and isolated, distancing itself from the citizenry, becoming ever more corrupt, ever more self-satisfied and self-assured in that corruption, impoverishing the general citizenry until such time that the citizenry rises up and tears that elite down. The oft-repeated sound of “jackboots rising up the stairs and silk slippers coming down.”

    That was the latent energy that brought Trump to power. It is still in it’s infancy. Wait for it America…..

Leave a Reply