Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.

Community Voices features opinion pieces from a wide variety of authors and perspectives. (Submission Guidelines)

Respect the national anthem by playing it less

American flag
REUTERS/Christian Hartmann

Public comments by New Orleans Saints quarterback Drew Brees have reignited the controversy over NFL players and others kneeling while the national anthem is played as a means of protesting racial injustice. In fact, the issue probably never went away, and important questions remain, including whether kneeling is disrespectful and should be forbidden or whether trying to forbid it disrespects and infringes on free speech rights.

Reasonable minds might differ as to the answers. While once seeming to support players’ right to express their views, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell later stated publicly that “Everyone should stand for the national anthem.” Perhaps his reversal was related to President Donald Trump’s Twitter tirades that seemed to threaten the many tax breaks that the NFL and its owners receive. Perhaps not.

An overlooked element in the controversy

More recently, in the wake of George Floyd’s killing, Goodell has stated that the NFL condemns racism and the systematic oppression of Black people, was wrong in not listening to NFL players earlier, and encourages all to speak out and peacefully protest. It remains unclear whether that encouragement extends to kneeling for the anthem, and Goodell’s statement was widely criticized for its failure to mention, let alone apologize to, Colin Kaepernick. Regardless of the NFL response, though, I would argue that there is an overlooked element involved in the whole controversy – that we have, in fact, cheapened the national anthem’s significance by playing it in places and at times that are quite unnecessary.

Stephen Arnott
Stephen Arnott
By way of disclosure, I am a naturalized American citizen. I stand and remove my cap whenever the national anthem is played at any sports or other event I attend. I know and sing the words – perhaps distressing those immediately around me – even when the performer inserts their own personal riffs. I regard this as an achievement because our national anthem is notoriously difficult to sing and not necessarily a great piece of music. Some, though perhaps not many, will know that the tune originated as an English drinking song and that the lyrics have historically been used extensively for overtly political purposes. In that sense, we should rejoice that the anthem has once again become the centerpiece for political controversy because it reinforces how vitally we value our commitment to rights of free speech and free expression.

But many, including now Brees, who admittedly later apologized, have criticized NFL players and others who have used the anthem as a protest vehicle, claiming that their actions disrespect the anthem and all that it embodies. I have no doubt that the anthem deserves respect and that it reflects the values that we, as Americans, hold dear, even if those values often remain aspirational. I would argue, however, that if we want the anthem to resonate with those values, we should ensure that we do not cheapen it by playing it at every conceivable opportunity. For instance, why is it necessary to play the anthem before every regular season game of every professional sport? Indeed, why is it necessary to play the anthem before every minor league game?

Australia’s practice

In this respect, we differ from all countries with which we compare ourselves where the anthem is reserved for the most significant of occasions. In Australian football, with which I am most familiar, the national anthem is played before two major games: the Grand Final (the equivalent of the Superbowl) and on Anzac Day (Australia’s most sacred national day) and not before every regular season game. This is by no means unusual. Other countries reserve their national anthems for undeniably special occasions.

Of course, some will argue that it is playing our anthem at so many gatherings that differentiates America from the rest of the world and that it is another example of American exceptionalism. America fought the revolutionary war and fought Britain again in 1812, and I believe the flag – but not the anthem – profoundly symbolizes the rights and freedoms that were hard won but often taken for granted, including the right to be united and the right to dissent. However, if we want to treat the anthem with the same deep respect that we show the flag, then we should not play it on every conceivable occasion. By doing so, we actually cheapen and hollow the message that the lyrics are meant to convey.

Playing the anthem less does not convey any diminished patriotism and respect. Rather, it elevates the anthem to the special place it deserves in the hearts of every American.

Stephen Arnott is an associate professor of legal studies at Hamline University. Originally from Australia, he has lived in St. Paul for 29 years and is the first umpire to be inducted into the United States Australian Football League Hall of Fame.

If you’re interested in joining the discussion, add your voice to the Comment section below — or consider writing a letter or a longer-form Community Voices commentary. (For more information about Community Voices, see our Submission Guidelines.)

Comments (13)

  1. Submitted by Richard Owens on 06/30/2020 - 10:14 am.

    Woody Guthrie’s “This Land is Your Land” is a suitable replacement for the anthem.

    It goes a little easier on the warfare meme and includes all of us as one people.

  2. Submitted by David Markle on 06/30/2020 - 11:25 am.

    I agree with the author. Reserve the anthem for serious occasions.

    And a corollary point of this discussion is: we’re taking sporting events much too seriously. They can be very entertaining, but are a diversion from life’s more serious cultural, intellectual or practical issues..

  3. Submitted by Bill Spankerton on 06/30/2020 - 11:48 am.

    “Playing the anthem less does not convey any diminished patriotism and respect.”

    Indeed, nor does taking a knee during the anthem in protest of injustice.

    But there’s an extremely vocal contingent that feels otherwise. Team owners are unwilling to risk anything that might anger those devout patriots into closing their wallets.

  4. Submitted by Charles Holtman on 06/30/2020 - 01:49 pm.

    I would view this at one further remove. What purportedly makes America special is its (aspirational) enshrinement of individual freedom and equality as the values that legitimize and inform self-governance. The foundation of democracy is the role and responsibility of each citizen to engage in civic deliberation about collective governance and how we should be working to move forward as a society to better embody these fundamental values. For our history, U.S. Supreme Court decisions have emphasized that the core of First Amendment expression is the political expression of a civically engaged citizenry.

    The purpose of the display of the flag and the playing of the national anthem, then, is not to freeze civic thought in favor of a display of rote cultural conformity, but rather its opposite: to create the mental (and in the case of the anthem, temporal) space for us to pause and remember our civic duty to deliberate toward a better society. In this respect, I agree with the author: fetishistic overuse of these ceremonial acts causes them to lose their power as a signal to prompt reflection.

    Also, this is why kneeling during the anthem to communicate a solemn civic conviction is the height of respect for the anthem, and the height of patriotism, while being sure to put the flag pin on your lapel every morning is its opposite.

  5. Submitted by Pederson Pederson on 06/30/2020 - 03:04 pm.

    Here, here!

  6. Submitted by Kyle Anderson on 06/30/2020 - 03:40 pm.

    I totally agree. Save the anthem for major holidays and the championship game.

  7. Submitted by Frank Phelan on 06/30/2020 - 05:07 pm.

    We should also be playing the anthem before plays.Movies too. Every school day too.

    If you love this country, you just can’t play it enough.

  8. Submitted by David Gawboy on 06/30/2020 - 06:28 pm.

    Completely agree with the writer’s sentiment. Just start the game and dispense with the superficial patriotism. Save the anthem for “The Big Game” and the world series.

  9. Submitted by BK Anderson on 07/01/2020 - 07:58 am.

    Well, if we are going to dispense with the rote (and mostly faux) “patriotism” on egregious display at every single sporting event in America, can we also dispense with the ritualistic displays of the flag by the ubiquitous military color guards as well? And the appalling fly-overs of (too many) such events by the precision military jet entertainment units?

    The US military doesn’t really have any business inserting itself so thoroughly into the nation’s sporting events. That it has done so for decades now is just another sign of the extraordinary militarism of this country. As a result we have been conditioned by the Pentagon to associate (permanently established) military strength with “patriotism”. It’s a dubious connection.

    The Framers of 1789, of course, would be both surprised and disgusted with this transformation of their vision of the nation.

    • Submitted by Frank Phelan on 07/02/2020 - 05:55 am.

      Don’t forget, the obnoxious displays of massively over-priced military weaponry is often a paid advertisement.

      I’m opposed to bumper sticker patriotism, too cheap and easy for me, completely without sacrifice.

  10. Submitted by Frank Phelan on 07/02/2020 - 05:51 am.

    Played on a guitar that emblazoned with the words “This machine kills fascists.”

Leave a Reply