Study in contrast: Pawlenty and Bachmann campaign in New Hampshire

Tim Pawlenty speaking at the Americans for Prosperity Foundation's summit in Manchester on Friday.
REUTERS/Brian Snyder
Tim Pawlenty speaking at the Americans for Prosperity Foundation’s summit in Manchester on Friday.

MANCHESTER, N.H. – The two Minnesota presidential aspirants were seated at tables right next to each other, at the front of a crowded hall of New Hampshire Republican donors and political activists. They never spoke.

It wasn’t an intentional miss, both Tim Pawlenty and Michele Bachmann said. They came in separately, and as the event concluded, both were rushed by throngs of supporters looking for pictures, autographs and handshakes. Pawlenty said he expects to talk to her at a rally Saturday that both will be attending.

Friday night was the first time since each admitted their presidential aspirations that their paths crossed in an early primary state.

The summit, as it was being billed by Americans for Prosperity–New Hampshire, a libertarian-leaning group funded in part by the Koch brothers, was held in a large hall most often used for weddings, receptions and theater engagements. So it was fitting then, that five potential presidential aspirants wooed a sympathetic crowd with five different proposals.

Mitt Romney, the businessman and former governor of Massachusetts, was the frontrunner personified, appealing to the crowd in a state where he has a second home as one of them. Herman Cain, the former Godfather Pizza CEO and talk radio host, was the fiery orator, serving up red meat with a preacher’s cadence. And Rick Santorum, a former senator from Pennsylvania whose last appearance on the political stage was a drubbing in his home state, was here to prove he could hang on the presidential stage.

“These are all wonderful people,” Pawlenty said, “We’re all going to be on the same team because we have the same goal and that’s taking back this country and restoring America to its greatness again.” And though their eight-minute speeches were all similar in theme — President Obama they said is taking the country in the wrong direction, and conservatism provides a better economic solution — Pawlenty and Bachmann’s styles provided probably the largest and starkest study in contrast.

Pawlenty gave his standard stump speech – “We’re the greatest nation in the world because we’re the freest nation in the world,” he said to applause – and then stayed to shake every hand that would grasp his.

That’s what impressed Brett Anderson, a native Minnesotan – born in Minneapolis, raised in Plymouth – who now lives in Hanover, where he’s studying physics as a graduate student at Dartmouth College. “I’m a big fan of Pawlenty’s, all the way,” he said, saying the former Minnesota governor has the “leadership and ability to bring people together.”

Bachmann’s speech was most new. She read from an extensive list of policy prescriptions that was in total by far the most detailed economic prescription from any candidate.

Some in the crowd loved it, like a lady who rushed to Bachmann as she exited the building and told her in no uncertain terms that if she didn’t personally address a debt limit rally in Washington that an increase would surely pass. Iowa Rep. Steve King, who was in town for the event, said she “hit the notes on the issues the best.”

Rep. Michele Bachmann offered, by far, the most comprehensive economic plan at the summit.
REUTERS/Brian Snyder
Rep. Michele Bachmann offered, by far, the most comprehensive economic plan at the summit.

Others said they’d heard much better from her. Former George W. Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson, for one, afterward said she told the crowd she was a tax attorney and then spoke like one. 

While Pawlenty seemingly lingered around the hall forever, Bachmann was first to leave. After shaking hands and posing for pictures for about 10 minutes, Bachmann and her husband Marcus left through a side door. She took just two press questions, both from MinnPost, as she walked toward and got into a waiting van.

Bachmann’s economic prescription
Bachmann did detail though by far the most comprehensive economic plan, in the form of reading from a wish list she made before the last election of what could happen if Republicans won the election “triple crown”: Keeping the House and retaking the White House and Senate, preferably by a filibuster-proof margin.

Here’s what she said she would have pushed for:

  • Immediate 25 percent cut in federal government discretionary spending;
  • Cancel outstanding stimulus funds and ensure that all repaid TARP funds are returned to the Treasury unspent;
  • Propose and pass a balanced budget this year. It should be noted that no one, Bachmann included, has proposed a balanced budget (her closest plan cut more than $400 billion, out of a $1.3 trillion or so deficit) ;
  • Cap federal spending increases at no more than population growth and inflation;
  • No more bailouts at all, for anything, public or private. “Uncle Sam would officially get out of the… backstop business,” Bachmann said;
  • Divest all federal funds from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and auction them off. Starting bid, she said, 50 cents;
  • Sell all remaining shares in any company the federal government holds shares in from the bailout;
  • End all federal involvement in student loan lending, and open student loans to the private sector;
  • End the health reform law, and allow purchasers to buy policies across state lines;
  • Eliminate federal subsidies on energy, while encourage all forms of energy production, including nuclear and additional oil and gas drilling;
  • Zero out the Alternative Minimum Tax, capital gains taxes and estate tax;
  • Lower all tax brackets below 20%, and combine all brackets into a single “flat tax” bracket;
  • Pass “mother of all repeal bills” to repeal last 4 yrs of Pelosi, Reid & Obama. I don’t know exactly what this means here exactly – she didn’t specify – but the context of the remarks seems to suggest this would be a wholesale repeal of Democratic policies enacted over the last few years.

“In my opinion, that should take committed constitutional conservatives a long weekend to get it done,” Bachmann said. 

On script
The rest of the field went largely on script, and Pawlenty began it.

“You tired of $4 a gallon gas? You had enough of unbearable levels of unemployment? You had enough of a federal government that’s out of control?” You had enough of Barack Obama?” he asked as the crowd hollered back in approval. “Yeah, me too,” Pawlenty said.

Santorum followed with a call to eliminate earmarks wholesale. He noted that doing that shifts spending decisions to the executive from the legislature, but said Congress had become addicted to wasteful earmarks. Cain went a step further and said, like Bachmann, he’d back a balanced budget amendment and eliminate the capital gains tax as well.

Romney’s economic prospectus was anchored in his business background — something he stressed as a key difference between himself and Obama. “He says he just inherited the downturn, and that’s right, but he made it worse,” Romney said.

As the five were speaking, Democrats responded by e-mailing opposition “fact checks” to reporters convering the speeches.

As Pawlenty blasted Obama on the deficit, the Democratic National Committee blasted him on the deficit left in Minnesota at the end of his term. With Bachmann, as she faulted Democrats for regulations she says are killing jobs, Dems in turn e-mailed statistics showing the private sector has created jobs every single month over the last year.

Comments (12)

  1. Submitted by William Pappas on 04/30/2011 - 06:06 am.

    Bachmann’s wish list is simply a regurgitation of the GOP’s national policy objectives. I’m still waiting for any conservative candidate to think for themselves. Why does everything republican have to be financed by the Koch brothers? Privatizing student loans, oh boy, more monster cost increases for a college education. Ending the exchange established by the health care act will quickly destroy our best hope of having private insurance companies truely compete against one anaother for business. Lowering the tax bracket for all to 20% will further reduce tax revenue by giving the rich a whopping 33% tax cut at a time when wealth is accumulating in the pockets of those very same people and everyone elses incomes are dropping fast. Of course the pour will pay more. Spending cuts of the magnitude Bachmann contemplates will create unimaginable job losses that in no way will be picked up by the private sector. One thing is for sure, she cares not about any policies whatsoever. It’s all about money. Reducing tax revenue, mandating balanced budgets and abandoning government’s role in supporting a functional and viable middle class is her laser like objective. The great thing for her is that in the process, the rich get richer and the rest of us get poorer which keeps the money pouring in.

  2. Submitted by Dennis Tester on 04/30/2011 - 07:10 am.

    That’s a pretty good list, except she should have included ending all farm subsidies, especially sugar and corn. But then she’d have a hard time getting the Iowa vote.

    Maybe she can add that to the list after the Iowa caucuses.

  3. Submitted by Ginny Martin on 04/30/2011 - 11:41 am.

    I read that this is the first time two Minnesotans have vied for the presidency since the 1960s when Gene McCarthy and Hubert Humphrey were contending.
    What a contrast! What would those two have thought of these two? This state was built by people like them, and Mondale, and dozens of other intelligent, informed, dedicated people.
    It is a strong indication of how far this state has declined.

  4. Submitted by John Olson on 04/30/2011 - 04:22 pm.

    I also noticed she missed repealing farm subsidies. Maybe its because she wouldn’t get a nice check from the taxpayers anymore? Not to mention losing Iowa right out of the chute.

    The last point on the list is laughable. What that tells me is that she just wants to repeal the United States and replace it with her version of what The People’s Republic of Michele should look like. What an embarrassment.

  5. Submitted by Sheryl christina on 04/30/2011 - 04:29 pm.

    I must live in a different country than you guys. I feel like I’m getting poorer right now under the current administration. I mean huh? Higher gas prices, higher food prices and a lower house value…I AM POORER RIGHT NOW than I was 2 years ago! I believe what I see; not what I’m reading here.

  6. Submitted by Clayton Haapala on 04/30/2011 - 04:52 pm.

    Michele Bachmann doesn’t know how to make a fist. Just sayin’.

  7. Submitted by Ginny Martin on 04/30/2011 - 07:07 pm.

    On reflection, imagine what Paul Wellstone’s reaction would be!

  8. Submitted by Tom Christensen on 04/30/2011 - 08:00 pm.

    Pawlenty and Bachmann are so distasteful to each other they couldn’t talk to each other. Interesting, it is the same reaction I get to them too. I don’t care to hear from either of them. It amazes me how shallow the electorate has become over the years when they think the likes of Pawlenty, Bachmann, Palin, etc., etc. should run our country.

  9. Submitted by Thomas Eckhardt on 05/01/2011 - 01:00 am.

    “End the health reform law, and allow purchasers to buy policies across state lines”

    I keep hearing this but no one ever tells me which state has cheap, comprehensive health insurance.

  10. Submitted by Richard Schulze on 05/01/2011 - 10:47 am.

    I think that the most reasonable response would be a presentation of data that supports the position that the US achieves superior public health outcomes compared to other developed countries — per dollar or % of GDP spent — highlighting how our system is superior. Such data seem to be in short supply…

    As far as Mr. Pawlenty’s potential as a candidate, his fundraising numbers will address that issue. In fact, Ms. Bachmann has already raised more money that Mr. Pawlenty has in his entire political career.

  11. Submitted by Dick Novack on 05/02/2011 - 08:38 am.

    Just a question.

    Who’s out there representing Minnesota’s 6th District these days?

    Bachman is always somewhere else making news for herself. At least Pawlenty is no longer on the public payroll while campaigning.

  12. Submitted by Tony George on 05/02/2011 - 11:00 am.

    The correct name is ‘Americans for Koch Prosperity’.

Leave a Reply