Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


Minnesota immigration-reform advocates push Congress to pass something — anything — this summer

Courtesy of Navigate MN
Immigration-reform advocates Terri Thao, Abena Abraham,
Emilia Avalos, Cristel Selvan Morfin, Braulio R. Carrasco and Juve Meza on the steps of the U.S. Capitol.

WASHINGTON — Frustration, disappointment and lowered expectations. 

Nearly a year after the U.S. Senate passed a major overhaul of American immigration laws, the mood among reform activists from Minnesota and around the country has soured as they push the House to pass something — anything — before election season begins in earnest and puts lawmaking on hold.

A group of nearly a dozen Minnesotans joined activists from 17 states last week to meet with GOP lawmakers and demand action on immigration reform in some fashion, even if it’s not the major agreement the Senate passed last June 27.

But prospects are dim this session. That was the case even before last week’s primary defeat of House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, whose loss will likely make on-the-fence Republicans even more uneasy about passing anything party hardliners can hold against them, especially something as sweeping as immigration reform. 

It’s a fact not lost on immigration advocates. Republicans’ responses to their lobbying, last week and all year, haven’t exactly heartened those who want immigration reform the most.

“Most of the GOP we talk to say the same thing: After passing the ACA, they don’t trust Democratic leadership,” said Emilia Avalos, 33, the director of advocacy and community at Navigate MN, an immigrant rights group. “They want a piecemeal approach because they don’t want to give room for agencies [to write rules for themselves]. Most are not for a path for citizenship.”

Pressuring Republicans

For many Americans, and especially more than 11 million undocumented immigrants, immigration reform is a deeply personal — and increasingly emotional — political issue. From the beginning, part of activists’ plan of attack has been to use their life stories to illustrate to lawmakers the impact reform would have on a growing segment of the population. 

Avalos’ father immigrated to America from Mexico in the 1990s, though she stayed behind to go to school. She came to the U.S. as an undocumented immigrant in 2001. She and her partner — who came to the U.S. as an orphan — have a four-year-old girl.

Last week was Cristel Selvan Morfin’s first time lobbying in Washington. Her family flew into the U.S. when she and her twin sister were infants, stricken by a case of asthma so bad doctors said they couldn’t survive in the Mexican climate. She grew up in Brooklyn Park, went to high school in Minneapolis and is studying nursing and obstetrics and gynecology at North Hennepin Community College.

Selvan Morfin, 19, also has a two-year-old daughter, “so I can relate a lot because I was two when I came to the U.S. and I just realize how important it is for her and I to stay together,” she said.

Political realities have kept their stories from sinking all the way in, even when advocates frame them in a pro-family, pro-children message they hoped would appeal to House Republicans.    

Braulio Carrasco, a board member at Navigate MN and president of the League of Latino Educators, told the story of a third grader he taught in Minnesota. One night, immigration agents arrested his father at their home, and the next day, “he didn’t say anything to me, but you just saw that blank stare. He was gone.

“As far as reaching their academic success, it’s hard to even start having that conversation when our students are coming in emotionally traumatized,” Carrasco said. 

Democrats share the blame

Their disappointment isn’t reserved for just the GOP, though. 

The Senate didn’t include everything activists wanted in its original bill, including lower funding levels for aggressive immigration enforcement along the U.S.-Mexico border. They’re also waiting for President Obama to take executive action reducing deportations for undocumented immigrants. 

Obama issued an executive order in 2012 deferring deportation for young people brought into the U.S. illegally, but he has held off on expanding that order while waiting for Congress to act on a final reform package. Given congressional intransigence, Navigate MN co-founder Juve Meza said he wanted to see Obama do it earlier, and that national immigration advocates haven’t done enough to push him that way.

“He was going to do it anyway, why not do it from the beginning?” Meza said. “So it’s disappointment in Republicans, disappointment in Democrats, disappointment in national advocates who turned against young people’s work, and then disappointment in President Obama for not doing this sooner.”

Lowered expectations

With time short and the odds long, Avalos said an executive order is the best case scenario at this point.

“In my personal, ideal world, we’ll have an executive order expanding deferred action so that will give us time to work on a better bill,” she said. 

There are no indications lawmakers going to heed advocates’ concerns, especially in light of Cantor’s loss.

On the Hill, Republican House Speaker John Boehner brushed off the suggestion Cantor’s defeat dooms immigration reform, saying instead that any bill is dependent on Obama.

“The president is going to have to demonstrate that he can be trusted to implement a law the way it was passed,” he said at a press conference.

Cantor’s loss also appears to have done little to push Obama toward an immediate deportation executive action. At a fundraiser last week, he said he “fundamentally rejected” Cantor’s defeat as a conservative referendum on immigration reform, or as a death knell for Republican willingness to move forward on a bill this session.

“If you think that because of politics you want to maintain a status quo that’s broken, because of politics we’re going to forego the economic growth and the deficit reduction, and the border security, and the fairness and the opportunity that immigration reform represents — you don’t belong in Washington,” Obama said.

But Avalos said she’s grown tired of the delays coming out of Washington.

“How long do we want to wait?” she said. “We’ve waited long enough. I was a child when my father was here. We’ve waited long enough.”

Comments (4)

  1. Submitted by David Frenkel on 06/16/2014 - 11:13 am.

    Tea Party

    The Tea Party has made it clear that immigration reform is a kiss of death for Republicans. The Republican party is now the party of angry white males. To paraphrase a saying I heard at the immigrant museum in NYC – Americans like immigrants as long as they have been here a (long) while.

    • Submitted by Dennis Tester on 06/16/2014 - 01:04 pm.

      As much as the Left would want open borders

      as long as America is a welfare state, an open border policy is unaffordable and unsustainable.

      Close the borders before anything else is done. The fiasco going on with the southern border now pretty much eliminates any chance of “immigration reform” until the flood of illegal immigrants is stopped and the people currently flooding the border are sent back home.

      We’ll see who the people agree with on this one and it won’t be just old white men, since black people, young and old, men and women, are having to compete with illegal Hispanics for the same low-skill jobs.

      • Submitted by Eric Paul Jacobsen on 07/17/2014 - 09:41 pm.

        Every Producer Is Also a Consumer

        First you say we cannot afford immigration because of the burden it imposes on our welfare system.

        Then you say we cannot allow immigrants to take low-skill jobs, because this will leave fewer of these jobs for us.

        To paraphrase: First, you say immigrants consume too much, and then you say they produce too much. These two claims don’t mix.

        In fact, immigrants are less likely than natives to be employed only for the first five years. After that, they’re even more likely to be employed than natives.

        But immigrants don’t take away our jobs by doing work themselves. Every producer is also a consumer. Immigrants don’t just produce goods and services, they also consume them. They need food, clothing, shelter, and other consumer goods just as natives do, and so do the children of immigrants. This consumption stimulates the economy, just as native consumption does. The more consumption there is, the more production is needed, which means that more workers must be hired. This creates jobs; it doesn’t “take them away from us.”

        Yes, immigrants send some money back to their home countries in the form of remittances to pay for their dependents who still live there. However, before a penny of remittance gets sent outside the United States, payroll taxes are skimmed off and poured into Social Security. Immigrants also pay sales taxes. Moreover, all those dependent relatives who still live in the immigrants’ home countries impose no burden on our social welfare system, because they do not live here.

        There is no rational cause to fear immigration. Opposition to it has no foundation other than a purely prejudicial fear of change – stoked by self-interested propaganda of the border-security industry and the private prison industry. Neither industry could make a profit if its own solution to the “problem” of immigration actually worked, but neither industry cares about protracted failure, so long as it can still profit from it. As long as these industries continue to secure government contracts at taxpayer expense, that’s all that matters to them. For these industries, xenophobia is profitable.

        The way we have chosen to treat immigrants – first withhold job permits, then criminalize workers who don’t have them – does grievous harm to thousands of people whose only crime is to try to make a living in the USA, as my own great-grandparents did when they immigrated. We inflict terrible suffering on the children of immigrants, too. This must stop.

        Edit (Jul. 17, 2014): In the text above, I included the wrong web address. This is the address that I should have typed in.

  2. Submitted by Don Honda on 06/16/2014 - 09:56 pm.

    Interior Deportation Lowest Since 1973

    The LA Times posted an article that shows that the Obama administration, the Illegal Alien lobby, and the major media outlets have been in collusion to depict the “high” deportation numbers. The exact opposite is true since the beginning of the current President’s policy. Interior deportation has and will be lower than 1973 rates. This is leading towards more people overstaying their visas and currently, more Illegal Alien minors crossing the border. Obama has just recently instructed border patrol to not turn back those Illegal Aliens on record as having entered illegally as priors, but to let them pass IF they don’t have a major criminal record. After the first Illegal Entry, it is a felony each time thereafter.,0,545192,full.story#axzz2xkzioeHR

Leave a Reply