Nonprofit, independent journalism. Supported by readers.


McFadden says he could support gas tax increase, then quickly reverses

The GOP Senate candidate initially claimed to support the tax hike as part of a revenue-neutral tax code overhaul.

Minnesota GOP Senate candidate Mike McFadden was in St. Cloud to talk with the area Chamber of Commerce.
MinnPost photo by Devin Henry

Updated below

ST. CLOUD, Minn. — Republican U.S. Senate candidate Mike McFadden declared, then quickly walked back, his potential support for a gas tax increase on Wednesday before aides whisked him away from questions about funding federal transportation projects.

McFadden said that, “yeah,” he could support raising the gas tax in order to bolster the federal highway trust fund as part of a revenue-neutral tax code overhaul. But not five minutes later, he revised and extended: “I just want to reiterate that I will not support raising the gas tax.”

Article continues after advertisement

McFadden was in St. Cloud with 6th District congressional candidate Tom Emmer, fresh off their primary election victories Tuesday night, to talk with the area Chamber of Commerce when the subject turned to funding streams for the federal Highway Trust Fund, an account supported by the federal gas tax meant to bolster transportation construction around the country. Congress recently extended funding for the program through next spring, but lawmakers have long grappled with how to keep the fund from going insolvent as gas tax revenues fall.

McFadden said Congress should consider “a dramatic overhaul of our tax code” to fix the fund.

“In terms of revision of that, I started by saying you’ve got to decide where your priorities have been, where are you going to spend it?” he told the group. “And transportation absolutely is something that is a priority.”

Asked by reporters later for clarification, McFadden said he wants to “look at all taxes. I want something that’s revenue-neutral, so in aggregate there’s no tax increase, but it’s revenue neutral. We can figure out a more effective tax system in this country.”

Does that mean he’d consider increasing the 18.4 cent-per-gallon gas tax as part of a tax reform package?

Article continues after advertisement

“Yeah, as long as it was revenue neutral so that in the aggregate there is not a tax increase to the American public,” he said. “That should be a non-partisan issue, we say it’s revenue-neutral, it’s a special interest issue, I get that, but that’s why I think you need bipartisan support to do it.”

The subject moved to education, and the scrum soon ended as he headed off to another event. But McFadden talked to staffers and returned to the reporters:

“I just want to reiterate that I will not support raising the gas tax,” he said.

What about as part of a revenue-neutral tax code overhaul?

“No, no I won’t.”

Aides moved McFadden out of the room en route to another campaign stop before he could answer how he’d keep the trust fund solvent absent a gas tax increase.

Devin Henry can be reached at Follow him on Twitter: @dhenry