MinnPost’s Daily Newsletter
The latest on the politics and policy shaping Minnesota.
Delivered straight
to your inbox.
Stay in the know.
MinnPost’s top stories delivered straight to your inbox Monday through Saturday.
Sen. Al Franken did not have long to revel in his re-election victory last night before reality sunk in, or rather was forced upon him.
Franken met with reporters at the DFL election night party shortly before midnight and the first question to him set the tone: was he ready to start his second term in the minority? He said he was, and he has hope that the Senate will be able to get some things done, either in the lame duck session or under GOP control starting in January.
“There are lots of things that we have to work on that really shouldn’t be partisan,” he said. “We have to do a transportation bill, that’s usually not been terribly partisan. We’re going to be debating an authorization to use military force in Syria, the airstrikes there. I hope that we’ll be taking up immigration and I hope that we’ll be able to convince our colleagues on the other side that it’s in their interest to do that going into 2016. We need to address that and I’m hopeful we can get progress on that. We’re probably going to be taking up an NSA surveillance bill … so we’ll take these one by one.”
Franken and Sen. Amy Klobuchar both said they had talked on the phone with GOP senators throughout the day about the term ahead, and that they were conciliatory about its prospects for progress.
“I already talked to five of my Republican Senate colleagues today, who are expected to win their elections, from [South Carolina’s] Lindsey Graham to [Texas’s] John Cornyn, and they all pledged a strong willingness to want to work together,” Klobuchar said. “We talked about tax reform, about the ways to bring the overseas money back to our country, we talked about specifically infrastructure and immigration reform.”
You’ll have to pardon politicians for some optimism on election night. Franken is right that traditionally bipartisan bills, like a military authorization and a (must-pass) transportation bill, stand a fair-to-good chance of getting through the Senate, a House where Republicans bolstered their majority Tuesday, and a Democratic White House.
But on big issues, Republicans and Democrats will need to work together to pass legislation, and that’s so much easier said than done.
Take immigration reform. A group of Republicans helped craft and pass the Senate’s immigration overhaul last summer, but a majority of GOP senators opposed it, and conservatives in the House rebelled against it to the point that it never got close to the floor for a vote. The desire to moderate before a presidential election might be a factor for the GOP next Congress, but imagine the stink Republican presidential candidates will raise if lawmakers move on immigration during a primary campaign.
Tax reform has long been a goal for both parties in Congress, and a rash of corporations moving overseas has intensified that focus. But it’s such an unwieldy beast of a proposition that nothing ever gets done. An early bipartisan, bicameral listening tour by Congress’ top tax writers last year yielded nothing, and even House Republicans, with their majority, scrapped plans for a tax code overhaul. That’s not to say it’s not possible, just that it’s never seriously gotten off the ground before.
Incoming Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has already outlined a bit of what he’s hoping to do with the majority. He told Time magazine last night that he wants to pass a Keystone XL pipeline authorization bill, repeal the Affordable Care Act’s medical device tax, and try to find common ground with Obama on tax reform and trade bills, even while looking to earn concessions from him through the appropriations process. He promised no full repeal of the ACA, and no government shutdowns.
At this point, Democrats have a major adjustment to make: they’ve set the agenda in the Senate since 2007 but they ceded that power to McConnell last night. Neither party was going to win the 60 votes needed to pass bills on their own, so it’s not like there was going to be a groundswell of legislating next year anyway. But Republicans get the say as to what comes to the floor, and whatever is subject to bipartisan compromise will be on their terms now.
But on election night, at least, Democrats held out hope for something resembling compromise and progress over the next two years.
“It’s going to be different,” Franken said. “But I’ve also received a couple of calls from Republican colleagues saying let’s work together.”
Devin Henry can be reached at dhenry@minnpost.com. Follow him on Twitter: @dhenry
Working together?
Now that Senate control has flipped to the GOP, why now the talk of “working together”. Didn’t that happen, and why not, over the course of the last eight years with Democrat majority?
Uh oh
“…they all pledged a strong willingness to want to work together,” Klobuchar said. “We talked about tax reform, about the ways to bring the overseas money back to our country…”
I smell a big, juicy bipartisan tax giveaway to global multinationals.
Just for reference, these companies are awash in cash. Their balance sheets are incredibly strong, they are doing stock buybacks, increasing dividends to shareholders, and for the most part not bothering to invest free cash in new property, plants and equipment here in the US.
Repatriating more cash to the US is not a problem we need urgently to fix. Especially if it means another excuse to hand big business a tax break.
Why will Republicans compromise?
Senate Republicans have vigorously obstructed anything President Obama supported, even programs (like Romneycare) that they used to support.
The American people have rewarded Republicans for 6 years of obstruction by handing them control of both the US House and the US Senate.
Why would they compromise on anything at all? They won everything but the presidency by their obstructionist ways.
I expect economic and military blackmail by Republicans to pressure him to sign laws that no Democrat should support.
That’s how they rolled in the minority, that’s how they lead the US House since 2010, and that is how they’ll roll going forward. They’ll put highly partisan bills preferred by the far right wing before the president, tied to things that matter, like paying soldiers, honoring the pubic debt, keeping social security and medicare for elderly citizens …
and we’ll learn just how strong Mr. Obama’s spine is, how willing he is to stand on principle. The rest of his party- exceptions like Al Franken aside – ran away from the president instead of supporting his policy successes – economic recovery, eliminating Osama Bin Laden, ending the Iraq and Afghan occupations, providing better health insurance to many more Americans …. and there wasn’t a whisper about those programs from the DNC. Al Franken ran the campaign every Senate Democrat should have run.
It seems Republicans hate government but love to rule. Democrats love government, but hate to take a firm stand for anything at all, refuse to have the spine to bring principle into their governance. How disappointing, really.
Very well said
I think the Franken ads and the Peterson ad with the track manufacturer in Marshall were probably the best this season.
On the other hand I would have love to have heard an old Al Franken monolog on the other election ads.