Secretary of State Steve Simon, shown with Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Tina Smith
Secretary of State Steve Simon, shown with Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Tina Smith, has said Minnesotans will likely know the outcomes of most races on election night or shortly after. Credit: MinnPost photo by Peter Callaghan

It’s a familiar election night routine for many: you flip on the TV after dinner; the polls start closing and returns begin to flood in. In presidential years, the 50 states turn red or blue, starting with the eastern seaboard, then the Midwest, then the Mountain West and finally the West Coast. By the time you go to bed, you often know who the next U.S. president will be.

That tradition may feel different this year: an emphasis on voting by mail in order to cut down on traffic at polling places amid the coronavirus pandemic means it could take longer to count votes, experts say. Or it might not.

Here’s a look at what you might find when you look for election results on Nov. 3 and the days that follow.

Potential for delays

In many places, the release of election night returns won’t feel much different than in years past, said Maggie Toulouse Oliver, the New Mexico Secretary of State and president of the National Association of Secretaries of State.

That includes places where there isn’t as much vote-by-mail, states that have lots of early in-person voting relative to the number of mailed ballots coming in, and places — like her state — where there are procedures in place to allow ballots to be processed and counted quickly “so they can go up in fairly good time on election night,” she said.

But it won’t feel the same everywhere. “In those battleground states where the presidential race is likely to be super close, it’s likely we will not be able to see the outcome of the presidential race when we go to bed on election night,” Toulouse Oliver said.

Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania are all planning on vote-by-mail surges and aren’t allowed to start processing mail ballots until election day, according to a review of election rules by Politico, which means it could be a while before those races are called.

It might be a bit of a wait if it’s close in Florida (as polls suggest it might be), too, said Susan MacManus, University of South Florida distinguished professor emeritus. Florida’s mail-in ballots must match the signature on file, and if Florida receives an onslaught of mail ballots on election day and needs to match signatures, that could slow down the reporting of those results. Among other possible delays, Florida has an automatic recount trigger if the result is within 0.5 percentage points.

An emphasis on voting by mail in order to cut down on traffic at polling places amid the coronavirus pandemic means it could take longer to count votes.
[image_credit]MinnPost photo by Peter Callaghan[/image_credit][image_caption]An emphasis on voting by mail in order to cut down on traffic at polling places amid the coronavirus pandemic means it could take longer to count votes.[/image_caption]
“If any race, whether it’s dog catcher, is within half a percentage point, it goes to an automatic recount by machine, and then if after that it’s just a quarter of a point difference it goes to hand counts,” MacManus said.

In Minnesota, coronavirus-driven changes to election law mean local election officials will have an extra week — two weeks before the election — to open and process ballots, though they won’t actually be counted until polls close. By-mail ballots postmarked on or before Election Day can arrive at elections offices up to seven days after the election and still be counted. 10/30 NOTE: Due to an Eighth Circuit Federal Appeals Court ruling, ballots that arrive during the grace period may have votes invalidated. The Secretary of State is not recommending voters mail absentee ballots at this point. More information about alternative methods of voting can be found here.

Still, the returns that are in by the end of Election Day in Minnesota will be reported, with updates as more ballots are counted.

Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon has said Minnesotans will likely know the outcomes of most races on election night or shortly after.

In the state primary, held in August and in which mailed ballots had a two-day grace period, most races were called on election night.

Delays don’t mean doom

Recent presidential elections have been called by midnight or not too long after.

In 2016, when President Donald Trump was declared the winner, he beat Hillary Clinton by 77 electoral college votes, and lost the national popular vote by 2.1 percentage points. The AP called that race at 1:29 a.m. Central Time the day after Election Day.

But you don’t have to look very far back to find a race where the outcome took a bit longer to call.

“That does not just apply to the 2000 scenario, which is the one that people think about quite often,” said Julie Pace, Associated Press Washington bureau chief, referring to the George W. Bush versus Al Gore race, which was decided by a U.S. Supreme Court ruling on December 12. “In 2004, Ohio was still outstanding on election night and that was the state that was really in the balance, and it wasn’t until the next day that Ohio was able to be called.”

How fast the races are called comes down to a combination of how fast a state counts and reports results, and how close the margin is in the votes that are counted versus how much of the vote is left to be counted, Pace said.

If the race is very tight, the race may not be called when there are enough outstanding votes to change the outcome.

It’s a normal part of the process for counting ballots to take a while, Toulouse Oliver said.

“The challenge is that most people, when they do go to bed on election night, assume that that’s it, the election is over, somebody’s won, somebody’s lost,” she said.

They don’t think about all the state and local election officials around the country working for days, weeks and even months to get vote totals finalized, Toulouse Oliver said.

She called the processes by which those officials work “vastly transparent.”

“So those processes are not happening without public eyes on them, and obviously the way it works is going to differ from state to state and jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but by and large, political parties, candidates, interest groups like Common Cause and the ACLU will have volunteers and in particular volunteer attorneys who will be observing the process and making sure the rules are followed,” she said.

A changing lead doesn’t mean fraud

This year, President Donald Trump has been sowing distrust in the vote-by-mail system, and some Democrats are concerned he will declare victory if he’s ahead in early returns on election night, even before enough votes are in to call the races.

Democrats have pushed vote-by-mail this year and polls suggest Democrats are more likely to cast their votes by mail than Republicans, so it’s possible early returns favor Trump while later ones favor Joe Biden.

Early numbers can be misleading. With 20 percent of the vote in, it can look like a candidate has a huge lead, when in fact, those votes may come from an area where they have strong support. When the other 80 percent of votes come in, the breakdown of votes may change vastly.

“Be patient,” Pace said. “Really make sure that when you’re consuming information about vote tallies that you’re asking some questions. How much vote is in? Where is that vote in? What candidate is strongest in that area? Is it in-person voting that has been counted or is it mail-in voting that’s been counted?”

Join the Conversation

7 Comments

  1. Why do both journalists and politicians knowingly confuse the electorate? “Mail in” voting consists of two very different forms of voting. Absentee voting is requested by the voter, has been in effect for many years, works well and is non-controversial. However, the other new form of “mail in” voting is unrequested, sent out by some form of government that relies on the voting rolls, is controversial and is conducive to fraud. Since MN allows same day registration, counties send out “bounce back” cards and indeed some are bounced back by the Post Office as “no such address”, “no such person at this address” and “this is a commercial address with no residence”. Additionally, many of our seniors who live in assisted living facilities, memory care facilities and nursing home facilities are no longer capable of handling their finances so that their legal address is that of a son, daughter or guardian. Who fills out the unrequested mail in ballots for the bounced back cards and these seniors? My mother was in a memory care facility with Alzheimer’s for the last 5 years of her life. Al Franken’s margin of victory was only 312 votes. These bounced back cards and unrequested ballots encourage fraud and only increases the division in our state.

    1. Ian, that’s a very misleading claim. The number of convictions doesn’t equate to the amount of crime. Most people speed every single day yet few are ever ticketed. Does that mean only a few are speeding? No.

      If you can’t verify that the person named on the ballot actually filled it out then you can’t find fraud now can you? The moment you allow others to help people fill out ballots, collect ballots, send ballots randomly to any address you have on file, etc etc is the moment you open the system to fraud.

      Elderly In care facilities are esp vulnerable to others “helping” them on who to vote for. Ballots delivered to addresses where the person no longer lives is just giving blank ballots to anyone who wants them. We’ve had cases where 1 guy was responsible for well over 1,000 fraudulent ballots. An election in NC had to be redone due to questionable ballot harvesting. Yet you still think it’s ok to allow?

    2. Regarding “the unrequested mail-in ballots for the bounced back cards and these seniors,” there ARE no such ballots. Despite what some would have us believe, blank ballots were not sent, are not sent, will not be sent, and, by law, cannot be sent to anyone, unless such ballot is officially requested, either by mail or online. That request must include the potential voter’s name, address, and city, as well as the driver’s license number and/or the last four digits of his/her Social Security Number. When a ballot request is received, all that information is checked against the information that was collected when that person registered to vote. If there are any discrepancies, no ballot will be sent. Furthermore, once that completed ballot is returned and processed, that voter has officially cast his/her one and ONLY vote in a particular election. The very idea that anyone can get hold of multiple blank ballots, and then vote two, three, eight – or 41 times, for that matter – is nonsense.

      As to the matter of how elderly and/or infirm voters might be “helped” to vote for one candidate or other, it must be pointed out that such “help” might favor either candidate. That voter could be “helped” to vote for either Biden OR Trump – or even someone else. It’s simply unreasonable to assume that such votes would automatically accrue to Biden, simply because the voter in question received help in casting their vote.

  2. Most early voters are voting, well, early. Not a day or two before election day, but days and weeks before. Highly advanced and civilized states like Minnesota, with its excellent Secretary of State office, will get all those early votes processed quickly, so that few that come in on or just after Nov 3rd will be easily put in the pile with the rest of the votes. Everything will be fine in Minnesota, and I don’t mean “Minnesota Fine” (like the dog in the burning coffee house) but actual fine.

    In backwards and barbaric states like Florida, who knows? But I don’t see how early voting is going to make things much worse in states that are already chaotic in their voting systems.

    This will be a normal year when it comes to calling the election. That is not the part we have to worry about.

  3. Are there states allowing mailed in ballots that do not verify signatures? How the heck can that be allowed to happen?

    Just how many more unique surprises have the Democrats laced into our electoral system?

    1. PA is one such state. They will not verify signatures. Thus there is no way to prove the ballot was actually filled out by the person in question.

  4. Here is my advice. If you are eligible, vote. I did so yesterday. And as for those who try to discouraged people from voting so your vote has more importance, just cut it out.

    The biggest form of voting fraud in public officials denying voting rights to legitimate voters to win elections. Second biggest form. Providing voters with false information so they are discouraged from voting.

    For those who claim a major problem with voting fraud at the individual level. Show me data as I do for you below:

    https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/analysis/Briefing_Memo_Debunking_Voter_Fraud_Myth.pdf

    Worst current example of elected officials blocking people from voting – Florida.

    Florida voters redeemed themselves a bit for George W Bush approving restoring voting rights for felons, only to have a Republican legislature to require paying fees before rights are stored. Michael Bloomberg has stepped forward to pay these costs for those with small financial obligations. Here is how the Florida “Attorney General” has responded.

    https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/23/politics/florida-michael-bloomberg-investigate-felon-voting-rights/index.html

    Bloomberg is acting as a rich uncle for those who don’t have rich and powerful friends. For Republicans who want to use the equivalent of a poll tax to keep Black men for helping to vote a racist President out of office, I am sure this is very frustrating.

Leave a comment