Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


Charlie Cook update on 2010: Not good for Dems

Charlie Cook of the Cook Political Report, one of the best known handicappers of such things, predicts Republican gains in the Senate, perhaps knocking the Dem caucus down from 60 to 55, and a Repub pickup of 20-30 seats in the House and even — this is not the current conventional wisdom — sees a longshot possibility of the Repubs gaining control of the House (although he pours plenty of salt on that suggestion).

Cook has been saying similar things for more than a month, but this latest summary of his thinking is a bit grimmer for Dems. It comes in a National Journal column, which starts out with a very conventional review of the recent retirements (especially Dorgan) but ends with this summary:

“Come November, Senate Democrats’ 60-vote supermajority is toast. It is difficult, if not impossible, to see how Democrats could lose the Senate this year. But they have a 50-50 chance of ending up with fewer than 55 seats in the next Congress.

As for the House, we at The Cook Political Report are still forecasting that Democrats will lose only 20 to 30 seats. Another half-dozen or more retirements in tough districts, however, perhaps combined with another party switch or two, would reduce Democrats’ chances of holding the House to only an even-money bet. We rate 217 seats either “Solid Democratic” or “Likely Democratic,” meaning that the GOP would have to win every single race now thought to be competitive to reach 218, the barest possible majority. But if Democrats suffer much more erosion in their “Solid” and “Likely” columns, control of the House will suddenly be up for grabs.”

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (3)

  1. Submitted by Brian Simon on 01/14/2010 - 02:28 pm.

    Any idea what he was saying at this time in 2006 & 2008? If my memory is correct, he did not see the big Dem gains in either year. For instance, the Dems getting to 60 in the Senate was viewed as a near-impossible longshot by pretty much everybody.

    Personally, while the electorate are clearly frustrated at the state of the economy, it is not at all clear to me that they/we are ready to return control to the Republicans.

    Certainly, we live in interesting times.

  2. Submitted by Richard Schulze on 01/15/2010 - 06:52 am.

    “There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.”

  3. Submitted by John E Iacono on 01/15/2010 - 09:31 am.

    I doubt the electorate would give both houses to the repubs, but they MIGHT be comfortable with giving ONE house to them, as a counterweight and stern rebuke for this year’s antics.

    As a group, we Americans seem to like it better when no one side controls everything.

Leave a Reply