Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


IP candidate Kevin Terrell imagines how he could break gridlock in Washington

On Friday (as MinnPost had divulged just a few hours earlier), Kevin Terrell of Minneapolis announced his candidacy for the Independence Party nomination for the U.S. Senate seat occupied by DFLer Al Franken. On Saturday in Mankato, the IP’s state convention endorsed Terrell for that very same office (and a full slate of candidates for all the statewide races).

The Terrell announcement event Friday afternoon at the U of M’s Carlson School of Management was a low-key affair (falling as it did on the last day of the legislative session), attended by just a couple of reporters and a couple of dozen or so supporters (most notable among them were the IP’s 2008 Senate candidate Dean Barkley and former Gopher running back Darrell Thompson).

Terrell opened with a slightly eerie joke that asked, Who does a better job of listening to the American people: Al Franken or the NSA? When I asked him later whether he meant anything particular about Franken as a poor listener, he said no, he feels few senators are open enough to interacting with their constituents. He, as a senator, would rectify that by, among other things, always publishing his schedule of meetings and appearances.

As for the NSA, Terrell, who describes himself as a former member of the intelligence community from his days with the Defense Intelligence Agency and as a contractor with the CIA, said he was horrified that the NSA — which is supposed to concern itself with foreign-based threats — is collecting data on the communications of U.S. citizens.

Asked by one of his friends at the announcement event for a bumper-sticker slogan that would summarize his campaign, Terrell replied: “Imagine, build, enjoy a brighter future,” which he later told me he had made up on the spot.

Asked how he would deal with the biennial IP problem of voters who fear that they would be wasting their vote on him because he cannot win, Terrell said he would tell Minnesotans — given the dysfunction in Washington — “that they are wasting their vote every time they vote for one of the two big parties.”

He later asked me to consider how effective he might be in breaking the gridlock in Washington if he and Maine Sen. Angus King held the balance of power in the Senate next year. (King is a centrist, a former governor, who won election to the Senate as an independent, although King caucuses with the Democrats.)

Views on issues

Kevin Terrell
Kevin Terrell

On substantive matters, Terrell said that he favors a revenue-neutral radical simplification of the federal tax code. (Republican Senate candidate Mike McFadden has a similar position.) When pressed for a specific tax code change that he would support, Terrell brought up the “carried interest” loophole, which allows the enormous incomes of hedge fund managers to be taxed at the low capital gains rate. Terrell said that loophole is one reason that billioinaires can end up paying a lower effective tax rate than their secretaries. (McFadden, to my knowledge, has not identified any specific credits, deductions or other tax loopholes that he would  eliminate.)

Terrell also criticized the Affordable Care Act, saying that he favored less federal regulation and more state control over health matters. When I asked him whether he would vote for repeal of Obamacare if the result would be an increase in the number of Americans without health insurance, he said that if those who are uninsured had chosen that status, it would be OK with him. That answer raises several follow-up questions, which I didn’t ask, but perhaps that’s enough for Day One of the Terrell campaign.

Other endorsed candidates

At the IP convention in Mankato, the party also endorsed software developer Hannah Nicollet of Roseville for governor, attorney Brandan Borgos of West St. Paul for attorney general, business owner Pat Dean of Lake Elmo for state auditor and business process analyst Bob Helland of St. Paul for secretary of state.

Compared to past cycles in its couple of decades of history, this year’s IP slate lacks anyone with much pre-existing statewide name recognition. (Its past nominees for governor and senator have included Jesse Ventura, Tim Penny, Peter Hutchinson, Tom Horner and Barkley. Ventura was its only statewide winner.) If none of the statewide nominees receive at least 5 percent of the popular vote this year, the IP will lose its status as a major political party under Minnesota law.

Comments (6)

  1. Submitted by Curt Carlson on 05/21/2014 - 10:34 am.

    Begging the question

    Terrell’s answer regarding the ACA doesn’t beg several questions, it raises them. Begging the question is an informal logical fallacy: “When one begs the question, the initial assumption of a statement is treated as already proven without any logic to show why the statement is true in the first place.” (

    • Submitted by Luke Ferguson on 05/22/2014 - 08:33 am.

      Usage sometimes trumps origin

      You are technically correct, which is the best type of correct to be.

      However, this one is probably a losing battle for us grammar elitists, especially considering how obtuse the “correct” meaning is. And the fact that most people couldn’t point out a logical fallacy if their life depended on it. And the new meaning does makes some sense – a confusing statement from a politician can beg a question be asked afterwards.

      However, if someone uses the phrase “for all intensive purposes” steam comes out of my ears!

  2. Submitted by Robert Helland on 05/21/2014 - 12:16 pm.

    Great to see him in action!

    I have had the pleasure of seeing Kevin Terrell in action on the campaign trail. Kevin is a deep thinker and a man of action who will make the US Senate race very interesting in Minnesota on the long road to November. I really look forward to the dimension he brings as a well-qualified and highly intriguing Independence Party candidate.

    To the general public, it may seem he’s an opportunist who entered the race at the last hour, but as a fellow candidate (disclaimer #1: I am the endorsed IP candidate for secretary of state) I have seen Kevin for several months preparing for his announcement and reaching out to the delegates and the party to begin putting together a network that will help him succeed this fall.

    All I can ask is that MN voters do not write him off (or any of us) as third-party candidates, and that you give Independence Party candidates your consideration for support and votes in 2014. Best regards and good luck, Candidate Terrell!

    ~Bob Helland
    Candidate for Secretary of State, IP endorsed

    [disclaimer #2: As a state employee subject to M.S. 43A.32 restricting my political activities on state time and resources, this message was sent from St. Paul Central Library Internet Computer Terminal #10 during my non-employment lunch hour]

    • Submitted by Todd Hintz on 05/22/2014 - 07:08 am.


      Sorry, but I’ve already written Mr. Terrell off as a candidate. Whenever someone starts off their campaign with the position that ACA needs to be repealed and health care shifted to the state level, well, I’ve already heard all the poor ideas from the gentleman needed to make a decision.

      Health care is simply too large of a problem to be handled piecemeal at the state level. What we need instead is a universal single payer system: everybody in and everybody benefits. Anything less than that is just going to produce a patchwork of state systems, some of which will be great and some deplorable.

      If Mr. Terrell adopted a position in support of single payer universal coupled with compensation reform he would get my vote. But now that he’s planted a flag in the sand I doubt he’ll even consider changing his position. I’ll wait for the next election cycle and see if the IP can’t put forth a candidate who’s more visionary than this guy. This guy though is just recycling the same ol’ junk we’ve heard before.

      • Submitted by Dan Hintz on 05/22/2014 - 09:26 am.


        I wrote this guy off because he is running under the Independence Party and he’s not a famous professional wrestler. But I agree that this guy is especially unimpressive, even by IP standards.

  3. Submitted by Thomas Swift on 05/22/2014 - 07:44 am.

    “Health care is simply too large of a problem to be handled piecemeal at the state level. What we need instead is a universal single payer system: everybody in and everybody benefits.”

    Right. VA for the masses.

Leave a Reply