Two Minnesota U.S. House seats will start next campaign as toss-ups, says Inside Elections

U.S. Reps. Tim Walz and Jason Lewis
Terry Gydesen/Steve Date
U.S. Reps. Tim Walz and Jason Lewis

Unless it is your job to do so, it would be silly to obsess on the likely outcome of elections that are more than a year and a half away, including elections in which we don’t even know who the candidates will be.

But there are people whose job it is to do that, and some among us who are so obsessed that we can’t help but notice. Therefore, forewarned as you are that it’s silly to care, I’ll just let you know that Nathan Gonzales of “Inside Elections” (which was formerly named the Rothenberg Political Report) has released an overview of the 2018 U.S. House races in which he assesses the likelihood that control of each House seat will switch parties. So, for the eight-member Minnesota delegation, Gonzales soothsays as follows:

Two of Minnesota’s House seats will start the next campaign season as toss-ups, namely the southern Minnesota First District, currently occupied by Democrat Tim Walz, and the south suburban/rural Second District currently represented by freshman Rep. Jason Lewis. 

These ratings obviously take into account that Walz, a six-term incumbent DFLer who had a surprisingly close less-than-1-percentage-point win last November, will not be seeking another term because he has announced he will run for governor instead.

In the Second District, Lewis is in his first term and won that race by just 2 percentage points. But the Second District has been won by the Republican nominee in nine straight elections. I’m skeptical that it truly deserves toss-up status but I’m not a soothsayer.

Gonzales rates two more of Minnesota’s districts, the Northeastern Eighth and the far western Seventh, as “lean Democratic.” But these ratings should also be viewed with caution until the two incumbents clarify their plans.

The Eighth has a long history as a DFL stronghold (DFLers have carried it every election but one since 1946) but has been trending much redder over recent cycles. Further complicating the forecast, the current incumbent, Rep. Rick Nolan, is publicly considering running for governor and, even if he doesn’t do that, will be 73 on the next Election Day.

The tall, skinny Seventh District, which covers almost the entire western border of Minnesota, is really a solid-red district except that it really really likes its Blue-Dog DFLer incumbent, Collin Peterson. One of the most conservative Democrats in the House, Peterson has won every election since 1990, most by comfortable margins. But Peterson may be the only DFLer who can hold it, and he will be 74 on Election Day 2016. I suspect Gonzales, and everyone else who engages in such exercises, will change their rating for the race in a flash if Peterson decides to retire.

Minnesota’s Third District, covering the western suburbs of the Twin Cities, looks like a swing district by some measures. It has voted for the Democratic presidential nominee in the last three cycles. But in House elections, it loves moderate pro-business Republicans like Jim Ramstad and Erik Paulsen. Paulsen, the current incumbent, has won it five times by margins ranging from comfortable to landslide. The DFL often seems to think it can give him a scare and, perhaps in recognition of that, Gonzales rates it “Republican Favored,” which is the last, least competitive category he uses, except for those districts that are so solidly red or blue that he doesn’t bother to rate them at all.

Paulsen has been raising campaign funds aggressively and even spending it so far in 2017 faster than most incumbents. That could be because he’s worried, or because he wants to scare off likely competitors, or it might just be because Paulsen is really good at fund-raising. The Strib reported that “Paulsen … spent far more defending his congressional seat last year than any other Minnesotan in Congress: $5.8 million. Most of that was on media advertising — more than any of the 435 other members of the U.S. House, according to data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics in Washington, D.C.” Paulsen is also wary about casting votes that might become controversial and is among the few Republicans at the moment who hasn’t said how he will vote on the current version of Trumpcare.

In the spirit of that last not-even-worth-rating category, Gonzales doesn’t provide a rating for the solidly Democratic Fourth (St. Paul) and Fifth (Minneapolis) where the incumbents Betty McCollum and Keith Ellison are viewed as prohibitive favorites if they seek another term. And the same (except in reverse partisan terms) for the Sixth District (biggest city: St. Cloud), which has elected three different Republicans and no Democrats over the last eight terms and where Gonzales apparently considers Republican incumbent Tom Emmer safe enough that he doesn’t bother rating the race.

Comments (5)

  1. Submitted by Roy Everson on 05/04/2017 - 09:22 am.

    The Scandinavian advantage

    ” it loves moderate pro-business Republicans like Jim Ramstad and Erik Paulsen.” If you can explain how Paulsen is a moderate and not a conservative you will be on your way to earning another journalism award next year. Let’s take a stab at it: Corporate Republicans and corporate Democrats are routinely called “moderate” by journalists who are afraid to use the “corporate” label for fear of offending corporate sponsors and their non-corporate and non-ideological readers/viewers. Even as Paulsen supports a conservative/ultraconservative party platform he demonstrates some attributes of the stereotypical Scandinavian-American: laid back, polite, passive-aggressive manners that make the ideology harder to discern and more palatable when exposed.

  2. Submitted by Wendy Ivins on 05/04/2017 - 01:26 pm.

    Erik Paulsen is no Jim Ramstad

    As a life long democrat who respected and appreciated Jim Ramstad, it is an insult to his legacy to compare him with Erik Paulsen. Moderate is the wrong word to describe Paulsen. Paul Ryan’s lap puppy is more accurate.

  3. Submitted by Sheila Prior on 06/03/2017 - 10:56 am.

    The third district is waking up regarding Eric Paulsen

    Eric Paulsen is not a moderate. How could voters in the third district have been so wrong about him? It’s probably due to the fact that Paulsen does not advertise his extreme conservative views. I used to believe Paulsen was a moderate until I spoke with him in person at his office and looked at his voting record. He does not align with my views on social or environmental issues. And he voted YES for Trumpcare on May 4th. How am I supposed to trust Paulsen to stand up to Trump when he refuses to release Trump’s taxes and he voted YES on a health bill nobody wants just so Trump could claim a “win”? How can we trust Paulsen to be pro-trade? Thankfully it looks like the third district is waking up to reality. More people are realizing that Eric Paulsen is a far-right conservative who has managed to fly under the radar by being mild-mannered and never talking about anything controversial. Personally, I don’t see him winning the next election.

  4. Submitted by winnie Sipprell on 05/04/2017 - 08:47 pm.

    Eric Black

    This reporter was too lazy to do the needed research on these supposed ‘moderate’ republicans. Just because they call themselves that does not make it so. Look at their record. At this time Paulson has blindly followed the Trump mandates and voted 100% for all things Trump. This, even though his constituents carried Hillary Clinton in the presidential election and he himself says he did not vote for Trump. DO THE WORK.

  5. Submitted by Kelly Guncheon on 05/05/2017 - 01:03 am.

    Way too early

    I understand that Gonzalez makes a living by issuing such reports, but his assessment of CD-3 is pure speculation, and he really doesn’t have a clue about what’s going to happen in the District. He doesn’t know who’s going to run against Paulsen. Doesn’t know the temperature of the constituents who comprise his District. Doesn’t know why Paulsen won the District last year. Doesn’t know about the growing and relentless anti-Paulsen groups and activities in the district. doesn’t know that some of his corporate sponsors are abandoning him because of his stance on border tariffs. Doesn’t know that Amy Klobuchar, who used to work with him as an example of bipartisanship is now working with Emmer. Doesn’t know that Paulsen’s voting record more than ever reveals that he’s a party-line guy who’s simply a puppet who dances when told, is beholden to special interests, and cares not a whit about what his constituents think.

    We suffered through almost two years of fake analysis. Give us a break. Report on analyses crafted by people who know what they’re talking about. Gonzalez doesn’t know CD-3 at all.

Leave a Reply