Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.

Donate

What to expect from this week’s Trump-Kim summit? It’s not clear that even Trump’s advisers know

REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
President Donald Trump shaking hands with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un on Sentosa island in Singapore on June 12, 2018.

There is only one real question hanging over this week’s meeting in Hanoi between President Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un: Can Trump avoid the temptation to give up too much in a splashy-sounding deal?

As long as Trump remains president, it’s hard to imagine the United States launching military action against North Korea. And there is a good chance that North Korea will be careful not to provoke the United States. That’s a remarkable turn of events, considering North Korea’s schedule of nuclear and missile tests in 2017, and Trump’s over-the-top response.

That all changed, of course, after the two men met last June. Despite widespread — and continuing — skepticism in the U.S. military and intelligence communities, Trump declared the North Korean nuclear threat over. The president is deeply invested in this.

Trump is now fully of praise for Kim, going so far as to tell a rally in September that Kim had subsequently written him “beautiful letters,” and that “We fell in love.” Even for Trump, that was a pretty weird thing to say.


Regardless, Trump is not actually solving this problem — as even his own advisers agree. National Security Advisor John Bolton is widely reported to regard Trump’s outreach to Kim as a dead end. The director of national intelligence, Dan Coats, told Congress last month that Kim is unlikely to give up his nuclear weapons. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, while denying that he was contradicting Trump, said Sunday that North Korea remained a nuclear threat.

The Center for Strategic and International Studies, or CSIS, reported in January that North Korea has about 20 undeclared missile bases. In Senate testimony earlier this month, a top U.S. general said he had not seen any evidence that North Korea has slowed down its nuclear program.

A confidential U.N. report also finds that North Korea is selling military equipment and chemical weapons materials throughout the Middle East and Africa, according to Foreign Policy magazine.

Trump is trying to downplay expectations of major progress at the Hanoi summit, saying he had no timetable for North Korea to give up its nuclear arsenal or missile program. He said he was in no rush, as long as Kim held to a moratorium on nuclear and missile tests. But officials in his own administration and analysts question whether he’ll be tempted by the prospect of coming away with something dramatic.

Washington is rife with reports that the Mueller investigation is nearing completion, and Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, testifies before three congressional committees this week. One can hope the president wouldn’t let that affect his negotiating strategy. However, Trump’s recent fixation on how deserving he is of the Nobel Peace Prize for his negotiations with Kim doesn’t instill a lot of confidence in his judgment.

The Washington Post reports tensions within the administration about the summit, with Bolton concerned that Trump’s point man on North Korea, Stephen Biegun, was trying too hard to reach some kind of deal Trump could announce after the summit.

Kim is big on offering up stuff he doesn’t need anymore, like the nuclear test facility he blew up as a goodwill gesture before the last summit. He may offer more such facilities, but Trump and his advisers have to make sure they’re actually worth something.

Bolton is said to be concerned that Trump could agree to ease sanctions against North Korea without getting a serious commitment from Kim to give up his nuclear program. Trump could declare that his administration considers the state of war that still exists with North Korea to be ended, or even broach diplomatic recognition.

He could offer to reduce U.S. troop levels or remove military assets from the region in return for a variant of the same vague promises Kim gave him last time — “buying the same lame product for more money,” in the words of Victor Cha and Katrin Fraser Katz of CSIS.


Cha would have been ambassador to South Korea had plans to nominate him not been pulled at the last minute because he disagreed with Trump’s North Korea policy. Dramatic moves could play well in Trump’s domestic rallies because they would save money and the president could characterize them as a move toward peace, Cha and Katz said, but they would give away something of real value.

Kim might also spring a major offer on Trump, they said, like offering to dismantle his intercontinental missile program in exchange for a sizeable reduction in the U.S. military presence in the region. That could appeal to Trump’s “America First” instincts. But in reducing the threat to the United States, it could achieve a long-term North Korea — and Chinese — goal. It would make U.S. allies South Korea and Japan more vulnerable to North Korean and Chinese pressure.

Trump’s presidency has surprisingly provided a breather in a dangerous, long-running foreign policy problem. But that’s about all you can expect from his brand of personal diplomacy. Trump may indeed have fallen for Kim. The danger, of course, is that love is blind.

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (9)

  1. Submitted by Paul Udstrand on 02/25/2019 - 11:32 am.

    I’ll tell you exactly what to expect, and I’ll do it for free… this one time.

    Trump will meet with Kim. There will be photos and smiling and hand shaking and afterwards Trump will brag about what a great meeting it was. Trump will expect to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for having this meeting with Kim.

    If you’re expecting anything of substance to happen you haven’t been paying attention.

    If they ever plan to meet again, I can tell you right now what to expect, but that’ll cost ya $5.

  2. Submitted by Brian Gandt on 02/25/2019 - 03:58 pm.

    I wonder if Trump is still in love with Kim?

  3. Submitted by Curtis Senker on 02/25/2019 - 07:31 pm.

    The experts also said Trump’s tariffs would not work.

    Today, China agreed to buy 10 million metric tons of soybeans to start offsetting the trade imbalance.

  4. Submitted by Neal Rovick on 02/25/2019 - 07:57 pm.

    Trump’s tweet after the first meeting:

    …..everybody can now feel much safer than the day I took office. There is no longer a Nuclear Threat from North Korea….

    Pompeo, yesterday, insisted that President Trump had never said North Korea was no longer a nuclear threat: “What he said is that the efforts that have been made in Singapore, this commitment that Chairman Kim made, have substantially taken down the risk to the American people.

    Really, what can you believe about a second meeting?

  5. Submitted by James Hamilton on 02/26/2019 - 11:11 am.

    From an NPR article in Spring, 2017:

    “To this day, South Africa is the only country that’s built its own nuclear weapons and then relinquished them. Three former Soviet republics — Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan — inherited nukes when the Soviet Union broke apart in 1991, and then gave them up.

    President Trump is now calling for North Korea to relinquish its nuclear arsenal, a step it says it will never take. History shows that countries are unlikely to give up their weapons unless there’s a dramatic change in circumstances, as was the case in South Africa.”

    It’s not going to happen in North Korea any more than it will happen here.

  6. Submitted by Paul Udstrand on 02/28/2019 - 08:47 am.

    Well THAT was short meeting. Who’da thunk? Next time I predict the future for you, you can send your $5 payment by taping it to the back of an original Picasso and mailing it to…

Leave a Reply