Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


‘A bunch of crap,’ says Pawlenty, of charges he ignored official duties


Gov. Pawlenty continues what is either a victory lap or a campaign warm-up. He was in Grand Forks Tuesday, granting an interview to the brass of Forum Communications and ECM Publishers. He sounds a little annoyed by a question as to whether he neglected his governing duties to lay ground for a presidential run? Don Davis files: “ ‘It’s a bunch of crap,’ he said about what he sees as Democratic-Farmer-Laborite attempts to paint him as a disinterested governor. But it is not just DFLers who question whether Pawlenty has mentally checked out of his job. Many Republicans also quietly have wondered about that. Pawlenty said that Democrats’ logic goes something like this: ‘He must be running for president or he would be raising taxes.’ ”

And: “ ‘The inference from that group is that he must have an ill motive or a mental defect because he just won’t raise taxes like a Democrat. And to be conservative, fiscally conservative, and to refuse to raise taxes and take other positions that I have there must be something wrong with him. There has just got to be a motive for higher office or something else wrong with him.’ ” Well … yeah, now that you mention it.

Come on, girls, we can do better. The Chicago Tribune reports that milk production “lagged” in both Wisconsin and Minnesota. “Dairy farmers across the nation produced 3.1 percent more milk last month than they did in November of last year. The leader, as usual, was California [America’s real dairyland]. The nation’s top milk producer generated 3.3 billion pounds for the month, an increase of 4 percent from November 2009.” As for us slackers: “Wisconsin’s production nudged up less than 1 percentage point, to 2.1 billion pounds. It still remains No. 2 in the nation for milk production. Minnesota was the only major milk-producing state to see a decrease. Dairy farmers there produced 714 million pounds for the month, a 2 percent decrease.” Embarrassing, isn’t it?

Marianne Combs of MPR posts on the State of the Arts blog that some listeners are questioning Gov. Pawlenty’s decision to pay $25,000 to $30,000 to an out-of-state artist to do his official portrait. “[O]ut of 39 governors, three (possibly four) chose to go outside the state of Minnesota to find a portrait artist. Why? Is it because we’re now living in a more globalized society? (not likely — Orville Freeman served in 1955) Is it a political thing? (also unlikely, since those who chose non-Minnesotans were a democrat, an independent and a republican, respectively). Or were they concerned about their image at the national level? Hmm…”

The artist, an Atlanta-based Bulgarian by the single name Rossin, has an interesting work record. Rachel Stassen-Berger, at the Strib’s “Hot Dish Politics,” writes: “Rossin — has done commission works of President George W. Bush and President George H. Bush for the The George. H. Bush Presidential Library, President Theodore Roosevelt for the Theodore Roosevelt Association, U.S. Sens Paul Coverdale and Saxby Chambliss and other power players.” And: “But before you leave the official portraitist’s site, cruise on over to his ‘Contemporary Works.’ There you will find photo-like oil paintings of a bald Britney Spears, a blue-eyed Jesus, a plastic Barbie and yes, Sharee from the Real Housewives of Atlanta.” Must … resist … temptation.

Combs’ colleague Tom Scheck delivers another in what is certain to be a long line of exit-assessments of Pawlenty’s tenure. He recalls the governor’s recent declarations of a “surplus.” “ ‘The good news that we’re here to share with you, of course, is we’re going to end my time as governor in the budget cycle that we’re in with a surplus and money in the bank.’ ” (Yes, he actually said that.) “Pawlenty was technically correct,” Scheck writes, “since state finance officials say Minnesota has a $399 million surplus in the current two year budget. But what Pawlenty failed to highlight is that he’s leaving Democratic Gov.-elect Mark Dayton and the Republicans ready to take control of the Legislature with a $6.2 billion budget deficit in the coming biennium. Pawlenty called the massive budget hole a work of ‘fiction.’ That’s a dramatic departure from 2003 — when Pawlenty characterized the $4.5 billion budget deficit he was inheriting as ‘the Incredible Hulk of budget deficits.’ “ Well, come on, The Hulk is, you know, like fiction, man.

For some reason that last one — matched with this one — has me imagining the Governor and Congresswoman Michele Bachmann  as those two little figurines on top of a wedding cake, joined in a form of bliss, if you know what I mean.  Ms. Bachmann was on … FoxNews … Tuesday, talking to Greta Van Susternen about the Tea Party’s role in the next Congress. This part was interesting, “VAN SUSTEREN: How is lame duck different behind the scenes from the other part of the session? BACHMANN: If you want my real opinion, the lame duck is awful. In my opinion it is unconstitutional. The 20th amendment passed in 1933 was meant to eliminate all future lame duck sessions. Congress didn’t want to see happen what is happening now. Consider, we are doing all of the spending, the tax bill, a nuclear disarmament treaty, ‘don’t ask, don’t tell,’ they are trying to do amnesty for illegal aliens, all in a couple weeks. In other words, a year’s worth of work after the voters spoke at the polls. So the people spoke; they don’t want what is being passed in Congress. We shouldn’t be doing this. It is really against the 20th Amendment to the constitution.”

My apologies for not linking to this Tuesday.  After Congressman Keith Ellison lit into  Congressman Peter King (R-NY) for suggesting an investigation into the “radicalization of American Muslims” (i.e., “Why Do They Hate Us?”) John Hinderaker of Power Line went after Ellison:  “Apparently Ellison hasn’t noticed that radical Islam poses the principal threat to civilization in the 21st century. Lone left-wing nuts with ideologies like Ellison’s, like the guy [referring to the one who flew his plane into the IRS building in Texas], are certainly a concern, but they aren’t the reason why we have a cabinet-level Department of Homeland Security. Anyone who doesn’t understand that shouldn’t be a small-town sheriff, let alone a member of Congress. ‘McCarthyistic’ [sic] is one of those words that liberals think have magical powers. But let’s parse it. What, exactly, was wrong with the Congressional hearings with which McCarthy is associated?” You mean other than the complete fraudulence and fabrication of it all, the cost, the destruction of hundreds of careers and lives and the depth of paranoia it injected into the general population?                           

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (7)

  1. Submitted by Jackson Cage on 12/22/2010 - 04:12 pm.

    Sharee from the Real Housewives of Atlanta? That was an unnecessary cheapshot. The woman has far more substance than T-Paw.

  2. Submitted by Dan Bredahl on 12/22/2010 - 04:20 pm.

    The term “radical Islam” is starting to sound like fingers on a chalkboard to me. There is nothing radical about it. It’s doesn’t look to change Islam or to implement/practice Islam in a manner that is new and hasn’t been thought of before.

    I think a more apt description is Fundamentalist Islam or Reactionary Islam. Their views of their religion are literal in every sense of the word. I’ll grant that they use means to accomplish their goal that could be termed as radical. But by no means is their ideology a radical one. Not by a long shot.

    You can now return to regularly scheduled programming. Just had to get that off the chest. Happy Holidays. I would have said Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. But Bill O’Reilly always tells me not to bloviate. HH = 2 words. MCAAHNY=7 words. HH wins.

  3. Submitted by Tim Walker on 12/22/2010 - 04:28 pm.

    What, exactly, was wrong with the Congressional hearings with which McCarthy is associated?

    Which brings to mind this oldie but goodie:

    Aside from that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you like the play?

  4. Submitted by Tom Anderson on 12/22/2010 - 06:18 pm.

    T-Paw was, of course, correct in what he stated about the State having a budget surplus for this biennium. The next budget has not yet been decided and we’ll see if the State comes up short. But it can’t, by law, so we’ll see how things end up after 2 years of Governor Dayton. Care to guess the budget deficit for the Federal government for the next biennium?

    I too was waiting for the Governor to “do something” these last few weeks. Maybe an Ice Fishing Opener or something like that. What else was he supposed to be doing these last few months? Unalot?

  5. Submitted by Greg Kapphahn on 12/23/2010 - 08:20 am.

    What goes around, comes around. In the run up to the 2012 election, little King Timmy will be just as completely ignored on the national scene as were the poorest of the poor and the least powerful of the powerless here in Minnesota while he was king…

    unless, of course, the Red Queen goes all rogue and mama grizzly when the GOP doesn’t give her the nomination and starts a third party, in which case, Timmy might be the GOP choice for least-well-known, and therefore most easily “framed” (and most easily disposable) nominee for what will inevitably be, under those circumstances, a losing ticket.

  6. Submitted by Bernice Vetsch on 12/23/2010 - 12:56 pm.

    The PowerLine guy is forgetting that most violence comes from the right, NOT the left:
    Timothy McVeigh, the Unabomber, the KuKluxKlan and other violent racists, for instance, and is sometimes fiscal rather than physical (tax policy that enriches the rich, for example, instead of fairly assessing all).

    Islam is not a “dangerous” religion, any more than Christianity or Judaism are. It is right-wing FUNDAMENTALISM that results in violence, not religion.

Leave a Reply