Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


Suspensions down, but St. Paul school behavior unchanged

Not better behavior, just fewer suspensions. Stribber Anthony Lonetree writes: “A year after a public flap over a surge in suspensions of black students, suspensions have dropped by nearly one-third in the St. Paul Public Schools so far this school year. But some teachers contend that while rates have dropped, student behavior hasn’t necessarily improved, and in some cases, has worsened. ‘Students have now caught on that suspensions are rare even for serious offenses’, said Aaron Benner, a fifth-grade teacher who spoke out last year about suspensions. This year, the district took a significant step to erase racial inequities and keep students in class by removing ‘continual willful disobedience’ from the list of suspendable violations in the 2012-13 student handbook.” The vibe in some of those classrooms must be pretty interesting.

This assumes we don’t get a first frost before the Fourth of July … John Myers at the Duluth News Tribune says: “The majority of Minnesota resorts and campgrounds polled in a recent survey, 84 percent, expect their 2013 summer season to be as good as or better than last year, according to Explore Minnesota Tourism, the state-funded tourism promotional agency. … According to Smith Travel Reports, a private industry tracking group, demand for Minnesota rooms was up 7 percent for the first four months of 2013, with room revenues up 9 percent. An unexpected spike in gas prices this month is a short-term concern, Explore Minnesota said, but high gas prices have ‘not had a significant impact on Minnesota travel in the past.’ Gas industry analysts say Minnesota gas prices should drop this summer as refinery outages end.”

In The Wall Street Journal, Mark Peters has his look at Minnesota’s new tax laws: “The measures contrast starkly with initiatives to cut or eliminate taxes on individual and corporate incomes that have dominated the discussion in much of the country, thanks to Republican control of nearly half the statehouses. In Minnesota, Republicans said the tax increases would cause jobs and residents to leave the state for nearby places like Wisconsin and North Dakota. State Rep. Greg Davids called the legislation an overreach by the majority party, putting Minnesota ‘so far out of the mainstream.’ … Proposals from the GOP have achieved limited success, as support for cutting income taxes is balanced by opposition even within the Republican Party to making up for lost revenue by broadening the sales tax and eliminating exemptions.”

For MPR, Mark Zdechlik talks to the real victims of the session … “A key source of revenue in the Minnesota’s freshly minted budget is a new higher income tax rate that the top 2 percent of earners will pay. The tax increase moves the top rate from nearly 8 percent to 9.85 percent. Starting with his gubernatorial campaign in 2010, Gov. Mark Dayton has repeatedly said that he wanted Minnesota’s highest earners to pay their “fair share.” It’s a puzzling concept for Mike Tierney, a retiree in Deephaven just off Lake Minnetonka. ‘I’d like to have anyone define what is a ‘fair share,’ Tierney said. … The new tax will cost him ‘thousands’ more every year, Tierney said. ‘It definitely will come out of somewhere. I doubt if we’re going to get rid of a car, stop traveling or we’re going to change our lifestyle very much,’ Tierney said. Tierney said he’ll probably reduce charitable giving to make up for the higher income tax bill. ‘Whether it’s the Guthrie or the chamber orchestra or the 9 million other people who call everyday looking for donations,’ Tierney said.” Cutting back lobster thermidor for dinner to only three nights a week might be another painful option for some.

The GleanMinnesota banks had a “mixed quarter,” says John Welbes of the PiPress. “In the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis’ first-quarter report on the state’s banks, signs of progress were tempered by signs that the economy isn’t ramping up quickly. ‘The bottom line for the first quarter was worse than I expected,’ Ron Feldman, a senior vice president at the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, said Thursday. Some data points caught the Fed’s attention, including slow loan growth. Minnesota banks’ loan growth was 0.8 percent for the past four quarters, which is less than half the rate at year-end 2012. That’s also below the national rate of 1.92 percent and sluggish by historical standards.”

Also in the PiPress, Julio Ojeda-Zapata looks at Sony going after Minnesota-based Imation over recordable Blu-Ray discs: “Sony Corp. and three other companies that helped invent Blu-Ray movie and data discs have sued Imation Corp., claiming the data-storage company broke patent laws by selling unlicensed blank recordable versions of the discs. Oakdale-based Imation violated several patents related to Blu-Ray technology, Sony and the other consumer electronics makers said in a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Wilmington, Del. The plaintiffs said Imation sold discs that are ‘Bluetooth-compliant’ but not properly licensed to be offered for sale. Selling packages of such blank discs with the official Blu-Ray logo therefore violates the patents, the complaint claims. Ken Kadet, an Imation spokesman, declined to comment.”

Happy birthday, Bob. Chris Riemenschneider of the Strib writes: “If the Blood on the Tracks Express train ride or the Hard Rain in Duluth benefit concert hasn’t made you rush to the North Country this week for Bob Dylan’s 72nd birthday, at least give Hibbing and Duluth credit for finally getting excited about their most famous native son. Seventy-five miles apart, the northern Minnesota cities are coming together for the first time to copresent simultaneous festivals. However, they could wind up rivals for the ultimate prize: a permanent museum in Dylan’s honor. Duluth’s Dylan Fest, now in its third year, coincides with a new Bob Dylan Way walking tour and a small permanent exhibit at Fitger’s Brewery. Mayor Don Ness points to the growing Dylan presence as a symbol of how times are a-changin’ in his city. … the question is if state officials will acknowledge Dylan’s legacy. Stroback and other Dylan Days organizers hope to garner Legacy dollars or other cultural funding for Dylan-related projects in Hibbing.”

In a similar vein … . Jon Bream of the Strib says: “Is $259 too dear to see Prince in his hometown? It wasn’t an issue in January when he debuted his 3rdEyeGirl backup trio at the 300-capacity Dakota Jazz Club. But the 3,200-capacity Myth nightclub, where Prince and his trio have scheduled two shows for Saturday, just introduced less expensive price levels. For $149, you can get a ‘second-tier floor’ spot. For $99, you can head to the ‘third tier balcony.’ And, for $259, you can still land standing room on the ‘first-tier main floor.’ ” To answer your first question, Jon. “Yes.”

The Strib agrees that five years after the meltdown, Sen. Al Franken is on to a good idea with credit ratings reform. In an editorial, it says: “Franken appealed directly for a plan that would create an independent, SEC-appointed board that would assign which ratings agency would calculate the risk of financial products. Currently, sellers of financial products hire their own ratings agencies. This can create a conflict of interest, because agencies have an incentive to signal that they will assign a high rating to win the business. ‘The analogy I like to use is if a figure skater paid the judges to give her a ‘10’ every time,’ Franken told an editorial writer. … agencies with the resources — like Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s, and Fitch, the three firms that dominate the market — are resisting changing a system that has brought them benefits. ‘The [Franken] proposed system could create new conflicts, be costly, slow to implement and cause uncertainty to the marketplace,’ Douglas Peterson, president of Standard & Poor’s, said at the roundtable.” Right. Reform would cause “uncertainty.”

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (9)

  1. Submitted by Paul Udstrand on 05/24/2013 - 09:39 am.

    “limited success”?

    GOP proposals have achieved “limited” success? I guess that’s one way of describing multiple recessions culminating in the worse recession since the Great Depression… not mention the Great Depression itself.

  2. Submitted by Bill Schletzer on 05/24/2013 - 09:52 am.

    I miss the old days….

    I’m glad that when I went to school there wasn’t a “right” to be in school, that they could kick you out for bad behavior, that they could fail you for bad grades and bad lack of effort. I don’t know what the answer is but keeping a kid in class that is causing trouble or promoting someone and giving them a diploma they didn’t earn doesn’t seem like the solution. I went to a good school back when C was the average grade and I was above that average but I know that had I not feared the consequences I would have acted out a lot more in my early and mid teen years. When the carrot isn’t working you need to have the stick available. And demands should be put on the parents since they are ultimately and theoretically responsible for their underaged kids. The other kids in the classroom that are trying to succeed deserve that.

  3. Submitted by RB Holbrook on 05/24/2013 - 09:57 am.

    That’ll show ’em!

    Rather than cut back on his fun, retired job-creator Tierney is going to cut back on his charity. Why? Is he punishing the charities he gives to because the Legislature did not bend to his will? What does he think that’s going to accomplish?

    If Mr. Tierney was supposed to be a sympathetic character, someone needs to try again. I just see another rich bully.

    • Submitted by Steve Titterud on 05/24/2013 - 11:00 am.

      Things are good, very good, for some – congratulations to them !

      A little arithmetic with the 1.85% difference making “thousands” of difference in a RETIRED individual’s taxes gives you an idea of the meaning of “affluence”.

      “Fair share” is really not so obscure nor arcane an idea, is it ? How about paying the same effective rate as the less affluent ? I’m just spit-balling here, but it would seem a good place to start.

    • Submitted by Matt Haas on 05/24/2013 - 11:52 am.

      But hey…

      I thought charity was supposed to be the panacea for cutting back the social safety net? I mean, to listen to the objectivist wing of conservatism speak there would be PLENTY of money for the poor if only we’d give it all to folks like this fellow to distribute based on whatever whim takes them. I think its always good to shine a light on just how much disdain the rich have for their “lessers”, if only to illustrate the absurdity of relying on private giving to ameliorate the societal ills of poverty.

  4. Submitted by James Hamilton on 05/24/2013 - 11:23 am.

    Mr. Tierney

    could always increase his charitable giving to offset that 2% increase. I imagine the federal deduction alone would cover it pretty quickly.

  5. Submitted by Bill Schletzer on 05/24/2013 - 11:25 am.

    Mr Charity….not

    Tierney complains that a 1.85% increase in taxes will cost him “thousands”. He’s rich enough to be tone deaf to what us middle class people think, but then I’m just one of the “9 ……million” that would be bugging him for a handout. I will help out and provide him with this tidbit, your “fair share” will be reached when you are humbly aware of your fellow man. Let’s guess his main motive for giving to charity was as a tax gambit. Maybe he can cut his gardener’s pay.

  6. Submitted by jody rooney on 05/24/2013 - 11:43 am.

    RB nailed it cut back on charitable giving

    How awful, I guess that means no more pictures in the Magazines for going to the charity events.

    How much giving do you imagine Mr. Tierney actually gave? Do you think it was 1.85% of his income?

  7. Submitted by Paul Udstrand on 05/24/2013 - 12:17 pm.

    Tax breaks and charity

    Let’s talk about these tax breaks for a second. I’m not wealthy, My wife and I combined make less than $100,000 a year. In 2011 I was able to scratch out a $300 tax deduction for charitable giving. When I went to itemize and deduct my charitable giving for 2012 I find that the tax code has been changed, there is no deduction available unless your charitable giving exceeds $5,000 if I remember correctly. Put simply, somebody screwed me out of my tax deduction and preserved Tierney’s deduction because people like him are the only ones who contribute that much to charity. And he’s going to threaten to give less because his tax rates went up?

    I say bring that tax bracket up an even 10%. That way we can compensate for Tierney’s reduced charity. Hey, did you notice, what with all that charitable giving by all those job creater’s and wealthy people the great recession was hardly noticeable.

Leave a Reply