Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.

Donate

Business and labor coalition recommends new gas tax

MinnPost file photo by Corey Anderson

Taxing and spending red alert! The AP says, “A coalition of businesses, labor groups and others is calling for a new statewide sales tax on gas to pay for road and bridge repairs. The group calling itself Move MN proposed Thursday that the Legislature add a 6.5 percent sales tax on gas in addition to what’s assessed per gallon. They say the change would mean a 14-cent increase per gallon based on recent cost averages. The group also would increase a general metropolitan-area sales tax by a half-percent for transit projects.” South Dakota: Barely a three-hour drive.

Also amid the flurry of legislation at the Capitol, never mind the probabilities: The AP says, “Free vocational college tuition for Minnesota high school graduates? Student-loan forgiveness for working in specialized fields or rural communities? Tax breaks for the mining and timber industries? A prohibition on performance bonuses for Minnesota health exchange executives?  Those are among the first bills trotted out Thursday in the early going of Minnesota’s legislative session.”

Remember that charge against a chicken processor that it was killing birds by scalding them alive? Not true! Says the processor. Mikkel Pates of the Forum News service says, “A southwest Minnesota food company denies allegations from an animal rights group that it scalded alive spent laying hens, and says there is no concern that the company will interrupt its production. … The Butterfield plant processes some 80,000 birds a day. It pays farmers roughly 2 cents apiece for animals at the farm gate and slaughters them for human food. From a 3.5-pound spent hen, it produces about two pounds of human food products, including wingless fronts, split whole birds and raw chicken byproducts, according to a company website. [Terry Fruth, a Minneapolis-based attorney for Butterfield Foods] said most of Butterfield Foods products go to Asia.”

And what might you suggest as punishment for this guy? Paul Walsh of the Strib writes, “Pausing to smile and lick his lips in satisfaction for the benefit of the video camera, a 24-year-old Princeton man dragged his live-in girlfriend’s dog in front of the lens, body-slammed the modest-sized husky on the concrete garage floor and beat the pet before taking him outside and fatally shooting the animal, according to charges.” Boil me some water.

Talking tough love, Wisconsin-style. The AP reports, “A Prairie du Chien School District principal has been reprimanded and suspended without pay for five days after using inappropriate language directed toward students. District administrator Drew Johnson released results of his investigation into two complaints filed by parents on Wednesday. The complaints said Bluff View Intermediate School Principal Aaron Amundson called a group of boys ‘idiots’ and used the word ‘kill’ to express frustration with students for not properly following directions. Both complaints said the remarks were made on the last day of school in December.”

But is he prepared for the barrage of phone calls from long-forgotten relatives? WCCO-TV reports, “The second of two Minnesota Millionaire raffle winners has come forward to claim his prize, according to officials with the Minnesota State Lottery. Officials said Robert Hans of Elk River came forward on Wednesday to claim his $1 million prize. He purchased his ticket at a Holiday gas station store in Ramsey.”

Apparently a not-so-profitable niche. Anne D’Innocenzio and Michelle Chapman at the AP tell us, “Teen clothing retailer Wet Seal is closing two-thirds of its stores, including seven in Minnesota, as it struggles with financial troubles and a changing retail landscape. Nationally, 338 Wet Seal stores are closing. The company did not provide a list of store closings, but store employees said the seven closures in Minnesota are in Rosedale Center, Maplewood Mall, Southdale Center, Burnsville Center, Crossroads Center in St. Cloud, Apache Mall in Rochester and Miller Hill Mall in Duluth. … Overall, nearly 3,700 full- and part-time retail workers will lose their jobs nationwide.”

Also closing up shop … . Stribber Mike Hughlett says, “General Mills plans to shutter two more North American factories, shedding another 500 or so jobs. The planned closures, in New Albany, Ind., and Midland, Ontario, are part of a cost cutting program General Mills initiated last fall to counter weak conditions in the food industry.”

Bill Luther didn’t make the cut. Yet another AP story, (those kids are working it today), reports on finalists for a regents gig at the U of M. “A former Democratic congressman and a retired Republican legislator have been left off a list of finalists for the University of Minnesota Board of Regents. The Regent Candidate Advisory Council forwarded 10 finalists Thursday for five seats on the university’s governing board. The Legislature will elect regents in coming weeks, with 101 Democratic legislators and 100 Republicans doing the voting. Lawmakers aren’t bound by the recommendations. Former U.S. Rep. Bill Luther and former Moorhead Rep. Morrie Lanning were among 24 applicants who didn’t make the cut.”

Funny piece from City Pages’ Suzy Piper on the over-the-top descriptions self-consciously hip restaurants use to describe, well, hamburgers and such. “If you ever have brunch at the Triple Rock (which is tasty, we might add), steel yourself when the menu arrives. For a rudimentary egg-in-toast, you get this description:

“Rock Star Egg-In-A-Hole – toast + egg $7.50

“If you are unfamiliar with egg-in-a-hole you are definitely not a rock star. Through a complicated scientific process, we meld egg and toast together, creating a hybrid to kick breakfast ass. We’ll serve you up two egg-in-a-hole and home fries. Want the whole experience? Get it with cheese for $1.00 more.’ This simply should not need the explanation it gives, and I don’t necessarily agree that toast and egg is a real rock-star ass kicker since there’s not even a sauce involved, but you get the idea. And the incredible thing is that each menu item has its own sassy description, when all you really want is something to curb the nausea from your blinding hangover.” Dear Ms. Piper: For your next piece collect up the most pompous and absurd artists’ comments on the wall next to their abstract/impressionist/deconstructionist/Dadaist masterpieces.



 

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (4)

  1. Submitted by Pavel Yankovic on 01/08/2015 - 05:30 pm.

    Maybe…

    it’s time to do a little research on Move MN.

  2. Submitted by Bill Willy on 01/08/2015 - 06:42 pm.

    I use it, sure. But I never voted to PAY for it!

    If you click the “AP says” link in the red alert you’ll find within the article an amazing example of contemporary fiscal conservative thinking that EVERY Minnesotan should see (tell your friends!).

    “House Republicans unveiled a proposal Thursday that would tap a projected budget surplus and shave spending at the Department of Transportation to fund $750 million in repairs over the next four years…

    “Citing a desire to avoid another tax increase on Minnesota residents, Republicans who control the state House opted for a scaled-back plan that injects some money for transportation fixes.

    “It would transfer $200 million of the state’s projected $1 billion surplus for road repairs, require state transportation officials to spend nearly all of a special fund, and find budgetary savings that would be used for roads and highways.”

    So let’s take a closer look at the fiscally conservative logic involved:

    It seems like everyone involved that might actually know (like the people responsible for building and maintaining the state’s “roads and bridges”) have been saying for years that it will take $6 billion dollars over 10 years to just stay even with the needs. That would be $600 million per year.

    But, apparently, the fiscally conservative are convinced those people have been lying and are also convinced (because or their intimate knowledge of what it actually takes?) that it can be done (and pushed off until after the 2018 election?) for much less. Instead of spending $6 billion over the next ten years on transportation, all we need to do is:

    – Spend less than ONE billion – $750 million – over the next FOUR years!

    That translates to $187.5 million per year which is $400 million and change less per year than those that build, maintain and fix roads say is needed, but never mind them.

    So okay… We don’t need $600 million per year for 10 years, we just need need $187.5 million per year for four years but we cannot, under any circumstances, raise taxes on Minnesota citizens (the ones that use those roads and bridges), so here’s what we do:

    – Use $200 million, or 1/5th, of this year’s projected $1 billion revenue surplus.

    That would bring the four-year total needed down to a much more manageable $550 million. But seeing as how that $200 would be a “one-time expenditure” (right?) that would mean the remaining $550 would need to be gotten from non-gas tax revenue sources.

    If we divide $550 million by four years we get $137.5 million. (It should probably be divided by three years, or calculated a little differently, because of the one-time spending from the surplus in the first year, but that’s a little too complicated for the non-fiscally conservative to understand, so let’s just leave it at four, round it up a little and say, “It’ll only take about $140 million in non-gas tax revenue in 2016, ’17, ‘and 18 to keep the roads open.”)

    Now that we’ve got that part of the fiscally conservative logic mapped out (sort of), let’s take a look at where the fiscally conservative logicians are sure we can get that other $550 million:

    1) Require state transportation officials to spend nearly all of a special fund.

    Hard to say how much that would add to the pot because no one said what “special fund” is being referred to, how much is in it, or, of course, what its current purpose is; and

    2) Require state transportation officials to find budgetary savings that would be used for roads and highways.

    And there we have it… Simple, easy, obvious. Maybe one of the clearest and best examples of fiscally conservative logic to be put forward in years.

    – ADD $750 MILLION TO THE BUDGET OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO

    – TAKE CARE OF MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION OVER THE NEXT FOUR YEARS BY

    – TAKING $200 MILLION FROM THIS YEAR’S SURPLUS AND

    – REQUIRING THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO TAKE CARE OF THE OTHER $550 MILLION BY

    – SPENDING ALL OF “A SPECIAL FUND” AND

    – TAKING THE REST OUT OF THEIR BUDGET!

    See? Get it? Simple, easy, obvious. And, above all, tax free and conservative as can be!

    If you don’t quite understand that, maybe think about it next time you’re sitting around the dealership or mechanic’s garage waiting for them to get done doing your next shock, strut, and/or $500 front-end CV (“constant velocity”) joint replacement.

    • Submitted by Logan Foreman on 01/09/2015 - 10:05 am.

      Sounds like a recipe

      For more falling bridges. Not enough to even maintain the transportation system much less build anything new – outstate or metro. You have been duped outstaters.

  3. Submitted by Todd Hintz on 01/08/2015 - 10:59 pm.

    Gas Tax

    It’s about time someone moved ahead with this project. My only complaint is the transit tax is not high enough. ½¢ is too low when other states are running 1.25¢.

Leave a Reply