Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


What’s behind the fuzzy-brained idealism at MinnPost

Call us fuzzy-brained idealists, but we believe there are still a lot of people who want to go beyond petty politics and dig deep into the urgent policy challenges facing Minnesota. In fact, we don’t just believe — we know these people exist, because they’re MinnPost readers. You!

Our journalists are eager to feed your hunger for a deeper understanding of the biggest issues shaping your community and state in 2019. To fund that work, we need to hit our fundraising goal of $75,000 by Dec. 31.


And we’re on a roll toward getting there! With just under 2 weeks until the deadline, we have $38,086 to go. Will you keep the momentum going with a tax-deductible donation of any amount right now?

Reader support at all levels adds up to the largest — and most important! — source of funding for our nonprofit newsroom.


And a big thanks to those who’ve already chipped in this month. We love hearing from members about what inspires them to support MinnPost’s thoughtful, independent journalism. Here are just a few of the comments we’ve received recently.

I read it, I learn, so I should pay. — Michael Hopps, Baxter

Minnesota news by local reporters. Includes the entire state and does not have a political agenda. RARE!!! — Daniel Freese, Plymouth

I appreciate your research and analysis of local issues. — Russell LaPlante, Mendota Heights

Appreciate the coverage of the news, national and, especially, the focus on Minnesota issues and events. — Judy Ross, White Bear Lake

This site gives very good coverage and analysis of local news as well as national news as it affects Minnesota. — Nancy Olberg, Minnetonka

Good journalism! — Judith Vinar, Annandale

I appreciate the breadth of focus and the coverage of rural Minnesota, in addition to the greater metropolitan area. — Ann Glumac, Duluth

We’re always excited to see how our work resonates with readers and humbled by the generous donations we receive to make our mission-driven journalism possible. Thank you!



Comments (7)

  1. Submitted by Bob Barnes on 12/19/2018 - 10:56 am.

    If you truly were beyond fuzzy brained idealists then you’d allow differing opinions in comments and your articles wouldn’t be so biased. The moderation of comments is beyond censorship. Take Erik Black’s article about a Trump poll… I’ve seen as bad or worse emails sent out by Democrats but no ridicule of them.

    If you truly want to be considered a solid source for news, lose the extreme left wing slant and bias. Otherwise you’re no different than MSNBC or CNN or The NY Times…none of which have an ounce of credibility left.

    • Submitted by richard owens on 12/19/2018 - 04:17 pm.

      How would you rate MINNPOST’s performance?





      Thank you for your input. We’ll be sure to pass it along to MINNPOST editors.


    • Submitted by ian wade on 12/19/2018 - 04:26 pm.

      Yet, here you are…

    • Submitted by Garth Taylor on 12/20/2018 - 07:47 am.

      If you truly want to be considered a solid source for news, keep doing exactly what you are doing. There is no obligation to air the opposing view on whether climate change is real, or whether race-based political appeals are protected speech. Keep going behind the scenes, keep going into history. There is a crisis in our democracy and enlightenment is the only secure way out. Shine on.

  2. Submitted by Dennis Litfin on 12/19/2018 - 04:56 pm.

    Bob….you obviously are not a regular reader of E. Black. The diversity of articles are there Bob. The majority of the commenters may lean left, but not nearly as extreme, or hate-filled as within your right-leaning news journals. MINNPOST will not permit that.

    • Submitted by Bob Barnes on 12/20/2018 - 09:40 pm.

      I’ve looked at all the sections here… I could put down several laundry lists of stories that are left leaning (some very left). The environment section alone… let’s just say that’s all I can say about it.

Leave a Reply