Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.

MinnPost's education reporting is made possible by a grant from the Bush Foundation.

From ‘zero chance’ to new collaborations: 20 years of charter-school risk-taking

The 2012 National Charter Schools Conference kicks off Tuesday with a reception at Target Field.

Some 4,000 educators representing 5,000 charter schools will converge on Target Field today for the welcoming reception of the 2012 National Charter Schools Conference. The Twins will be playing in Pittsburgh, but the conferees will enjoy lots of deep-fried local delicacies on sticks and inspiring performances by students.

There will be cake, in honor of the 20th anniversary of the start of the charter movement, and no doubt some equally sugary remarks about how quickly the independents have grown in a single generation. A glass or two will likely be raised in recognition of the panelists and attendees who participated in drafting Minnesota’s charter law, the nation’s first, in 1991.

There might even be some flowery speechifying about how the movement has achieved its initial goal: to drive innovation in education by allowing groups of educators and interested citizens to try new school models.

The rest of the confab, sponsored by the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools? That belongs to the future. Before we go there, however, Your Humble Blogger is going to pause for a refresher course in the movement’s origins. I hope you will stick with it whatever your stance toward charters; the lens of even two decades’ history is instructional.

Zero Chance of PassageHere we are going to crib liberally from a brand new book by the charter law’s original sponsor, former state Sen. Ember Reichgott Junge, “Zero Chance of Passage: The Pioneering Charter School Story.” (Expect to read more about the book in this space soon; if you are at all public-policy obsessed, “Zero Chance” is riveting reading.)

‘A Nation at Risk’ released in ’83

Like their brethren over the last three decades, many of the school reforms on this year’s legislative agenda can be traced to the last era in which the body politic believed itself to be facing a crisis in education: The years immediately following the 1983 release of “A Nation at Risk,” which damned schools for failing huge numbers of students.

The report, a product of the Reagan administration, cast blame on teachers unions, which for the most part responded by circling wagons. Pretty much the same cast of characters as today lined up in pretty much the same formations. 

In 1988, Minnesota passed the first mandatory open-enrollment bill, which, among other tectonic shifts, freed state tuition dollars to follow pupils. A few months later, a gathering of lawmakers, educators and business, civic and union leaders gathered at Madden’s Resort near Brainerd.

Among the speakers was Al Shanker, probably not a name in your household but the legendary American Federation of Teachers president who shook numerous establishments with proposals to empower teachers, who he envisioned would finally be treated as professionals.

Shanker told the Minnesotans that he thought something called a charter school, a proposal advanced by an unknown education professor named Roy Budde, offered the best hope for radical change. A charter being something “some official body” would hand to a group of teachers “for exploration into unknown territory” and implying “both the idea of a franchise and a competition.”

Inherent risk

Risk, he imagined, was inherent to the exercise: “There’s no guarantee that a charter school will find better ways of educating students.”

Ember Reichgott JungeEmber Reichgott Junge

Soon thereafter Reichgott Junge and a handful of other education advocates, including former Citizens League head Ted Kolderie and school innovator Joe Nathan, had a collective light-bulb moment: What good is school choice if your alternatives are all the same, and of the same low or middling quality?

A couple of years of painstaking bipartisan sausage-making later the state Legislature passed the charter law in 1991. The following year the nation’s first public charter school, City Academy High School, opened in St. Paul.

As Shanker foresaw, many of the exploratory expeditions into new school models produced worse results than mainline public schools. Yet slowly — and here we are going to turn the wayback machine around and throttle over years of financial shenanigans, dozens of brave experiments, the taking up of the charter torch elsewhere and more — tall poppies sprung up here and there.

Like the St. Paul Conservatory for Performing Artists, which has sent grads to Juilliard. And Cyber Village Academy, the state’s top-ranked online school, which is a model of so-called blended learning. Yinghua Academy is the first Chinese immersion school in the United States. A seat in Nova Classical Academy is as sought after as any East Coast prep school.

Collaborations forming

And of course there is a growing roster of odds-beating schools throughout the Twin Cities, where the most disadvantaged students are achieving amazing things. There has been a wholesale change of tune from within the establishment, and struggling districts are forming formal collaborations with charters so as to study Shanker’s coveted innovations.

There is, in short, enough there there now to let go of the memes of the past and fill three consecutive 10-hour days with enough panels and workshops and breakout sessions to keep the Minneapolis Convention Center buzzing.

And so on Wednesday, conference attendees will line up early for a schedule that boasts the cream of the education reform crop. Bill Cosby will deliver the keynote address.

And there will be panels on the uses of data, recruiting and retaining teachers, combating burnout, reaching special-ed students and English-language learners and collaborating with traditional districts, governance, creating stable funding streams and — illustrative of the movement’s maturity — teacher pensions.

The Hall of Fame

One of the very first agenda items is the induction of four new members into the National Charter School Hall of Fame. Three of them are locals: City Academy; Jon Schroeder, who played a major role in creating the Federal Charter School Program while on the staff of former U.S. Sen. Dave Durenberger, R-Minnesota; and Eric Mahmoud, founder of several odds-beating north Minneapolis schools, most notably Harvest Prep and Seed Academy.

The president of the Colorado League of Charter Schools, Jim Griffin, will also be honored. Past honorees include Kolderie and Reichgott Junge.

Not on the agenda: The usual hand-wringing over whether charters are legitimate members of the public school community.

Comments (5)

  1. Submitted by Ray Schoch on 06/19/2012 - 09:49 am.

    New collaborations

    A “National Charter School Hall of Fame?” Seriously? Nonetheless, it’s good to see that “…hand-wringing over whether charters are legitimate members of the public school community…” is expected to be absent.

    It’s my understanding that experimentation and collaboration, not competition, was the rationale for charter schools early on, so the degree to which that collaborative model with “regular” public schools is finally taking place in fact as well as in rhetoric seems a good thing to me. Leaving aside the often-ridiculous right wing academies of various kinds, the more permeable the membrane between the two, especially between the “odds-beating” charters and their more “regular” counterparts, the more children, and in the long run the larger society, seem likely to benefit.

  2. Submitted by Randy Marsh on 06/19/2012 - 10:04 am.

    Puppies and bunnies

    Wow, what an interesting perspective on the charter school movement, although I start to question your credibility when two paragraphs in you have these folks attending a Twins game, which last I checked was being played in Pittsburgh. Oh well, hopefully you know more about education than sports. Instead of waxing poetic, I wish you would share just one (more would be great) innovations or teaching/learning models created by charter schools that have benefited public schools, which I believe was the intent. After 20 years, shouldn’t we have some examples? It’s also wonderful to see those esteemed leaders honored with hall of fame inductions, but perhaps we should also learn from the much longer list of charter school leaders destined for the hall of shame. I’m not saying there isn’t a place for charters, but the numbers have grown beyond all reasonable limits that should have been in place, especially when they are created in areas that do have high achieving public schools, which does little more than simply doubling the costs. Need evidence, look up St. Croix Preparatory Academy sometime.

  3. Anonymous Submitted by Anonymous on 06/19/2012 - 11:48 am.

    Charter school hall of shame

    Hall of Fame? How about a Hall of Shame?

    Or how about the report from the Minnesota DOE in 2010 that Charter schools are SEVEN TIMES MORE LIKELY TO BE FAILING than regular public schools? Michael Moore said in 2003 that we live in fictitious times. Nothing could better exemplify that than the tsunami of self-congratulations and expansion of charter schools in an era when they have been proven to provide, on average, worse educations than regular public schools. No amount of money from rich corporatists can change the fact that Charter schools have been a disastrous failure built on mountains of propaganda and lies.

  4. Submitted by Joe Musich on 06/19/2012 - 05:36 pm.

    still no entrance to the targer

    Wow ! No mention of where the dollars came from to rent the Target. I tell you if this were a public school event or a union event the first question out of the box would be ……and what about the oz fees. Give me a handle on the expenses for this event. Where is the money coming for people to travel and stay lodge here ? With actual weak relative success of charters is the investment in this party worth it ?

Leave a Reply