Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


Current negotiations have huge importance beyond Iran’s relationship to the West

Over the past two weeks, the unorthodox letter to Iranian officials authored by Sen. Tom Cotton has received high media coverage. This is understandable, considering that this letter marked a serious departure from political decorum and, arguably, the law. What most articles miss though, is the big picture. By zeroing in on this singular instance, we neglect to recognize that negotiations with Iran are of far greater consequence than political games, and even more important than the possibility of a changing relationship between the global West and the Iranian government.

These negotiations have to do with the eventual elimination of nuclear weapons — a truly existential threat that we have become frighteningly complacent toward. The fact that the word “diplomacy” has taken on such a negative connotation of inaction is troublesome. A steady process may lend itself to progressive change if given the chance. We have an opportunity to work toward a world where such an outdated and extreme measure that compromises rather than ensures global security no longer looms in the background.

Negotiations with Iran, without the threat of premature sanctions or other extraneous commentary from the proverbial peanut gallery, could mark an important step forward in the fight for the elimination of nuclear weapons. Let’s let diplomacy work and avoid unnecessary conflict.

MinnPost welcomes original letters from readers on current topics of general interest. Interested in joining the conversation? Submit your letter to the editor.

The choice of letters for publication is at the discretion of MinnPost editors; they will not be able to respond to individual inquiries about letters.

Comments (3)

  1. Submitted by Paul Brandon on 03/23/2015 - 03:54 pm.

    Shouldn’t we be negotiating

    with ALL of the nuclear powers in the Middle East?

  2. Submitted by Dennis Tester on 03/24/2015 - 01:33 pm.

    Iranian nukes means nuclear proliferation

    The middle east is now engaged in a religious war. If Shia-controlled Iran gets a nuke, all the Sunni countries in the region (Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Jordan, Qatar) will want one too. And they’ll want one now.

    Ironically, the Sunni nations are now aligned with Israel in their demand that Iran not be allowed to have a nuclear weapon and are scared to death that John Kerry and Obama will allow it to happen for the sake of getting a meaningless political deal.

  3. Submitted by rolf westgard on 03/29/2015 - 07:24 pm.

    Pipe dreams

    “Negotiations with Iran…..could mark an important step forward in the fight for the elimination of nuclear weapons.”
    Since Iran doesn’t have any nuclear weapons, it is hard to see how negotiations with them would eliminate nuclear weapons.
    On the other hand, Israel is bristling with them. Why aren’t we negotiating with Israel on a plan to eliminate their nukes?

Leave a Reply