Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.

Donate

How Twin Cities suburbs are trying to address the need for more Section 8 housing

Chaska houses
The more affluent suburbs of the Twin Cities, such as Chaska, have the highest payment standards for Section 8 vouchers.

Shannon first started using a Section 8 housing voucher after brain surgery that forced her to quit her job at a call center in Fort Collins, Colorado, 15 years ago.

The single mother of a 5-year-old daughter, Shannon saw the voucher — which provides rental assistance for low-income families seeking housing in the private market — as a golden ticket to a clean home with working appliances, which she had struggled to afford on her small monthly disability check and money from occasional temporary jobs. 

“I thought I would finally be able to move to a place that would be a decent place, not like typical low-income housing,” she said. “My daughter was young, and I thought, ‘To have a yard this would be so great.’”

But since becoming eligible for the program, Shannon, who now lives in Excelsior, has struggled to find apartments in both Fort Collins and the Twin Cities metro that fulfill her income requirements and desires for cleanliness and space. (She requested we not use her last name out of fear that speaking publicly will diminish her chances of securing a new place to live.)


Now Shannon has new hope; she’s on a waitlist to lease a new one-bedroom apartment in a complex now under construction in Eden Prairie — a site that has on-site laundry, underground parking and is closer to family than her current home. The problem: Dozens of other Section 8 voucher-holders are also on the waitlist for the same apartment.

That type of competition has become common across the Twin Cities metro area, a sign of the high demand for affordable housing that goes beyond just Minneapolis and St. Paul at a time when the region’s building boom has largely targeted residents who can pay market rates.

Now, housing advocates and officials across the metro are boosting efforts to raise awareness of the need for Section 8 housing, including attempts to recruit more landlords who will accept the vouchers. “When occupancy rates are as high as they are right now, owners don’t feel as obligated to rent to somebody that has some type of rental subsidy,” said St. Louis Park housing supervisor Michele Schnitker, so the city has had to find ways to partner with landlords. “We’ve been successful in that.”

Payments vary

Across the country, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) determines the number of vouchers and the size of rental subsidies available in different communities, calculations based on median rents and wages. (Once someone qualifies for a voucher he or she can only redeem the certificate within the geographic bounds of the housing authority that issued it to them.)

The more affluent suburbs of the Twin Cities, such as Chanhassen, Chaska, Eden Prairie and Edina, have the highest payment standards for Section 8 vouchers, ranging from $1,005 for a one-bedroom unit to $2,740 for a six-bedroom apartment, according to HousingLink, a Minneapolis-based nonprofit that tracks housing vacancies and wait-list openings. Bloomington is on the other end of the payment spectrum, with a payment standard of $890 for a one-bedroom to $2,120 for a six-bedroom apartment. 

That criteria helps level the playing field for different housing authorities in terms of recruiting property owners. “It’s not like landlords are more willing in the suburbs or landlords are more willing in the city,” said Josh Dye, a spokesman for HousingLink. “You’ll find willingness and unwillingness in both … the payment standard eliminates the willingness conversation.”

Not keeping up

Yet the payment system is not keeping up with the region’s quickly evolving housing market, said Eric Hauge, executive director of HOME Line, a nonprofit that offers legal advice and advocacy for tenants. On an annual basis, each area’s housing authority recalibrates payment standards based on market trends from the year prior, which means the criteria do not reflect new rent hikes.


In general, the worth of vouchers in both the suburbs and core cities are not keeping up with rising rents,” Hauge said. “The voucher payment standards are supposed to keep up with the rent, but there’s been a delay. … As rents go up on a much faster basis, the people are getting priced out with their vouchers.”

Part of the problem is the persistently low vacancy rate across the Twin Cities. According to the Metropolitan Council’s Housing and Redevelopment Authority Director Terri Smith, the current vacancy rate is 3 percent metrowide — and 1 percent for Minneapolis and some suburbs. For perspective, the national average rental vacancy rate is about 7 percent, per 2018 HUD data

Complicating matters for low-income renters are the varying types of supply by area. In general, the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul have more high-rise rental apartments for low-income tenants, as well as greater diversity of housing types, making for concentrated areas of homes available to low-income tenants that aren’t as prevalent in the suburbs. 

At the same time, the number of residents living in poverty has increased faster in the suburbs than in Minneapolis-St. Paul. Suburban communities such as Brooklyn Park, North St. Paul and Oakdale now have large disparities between the number of cost-burdened households who live there and the availability of affordable housing. (Housing experts consider a household to be cost burdened if members of the household spend more than about one-third of their monthly income on housing.)

For low-income renters in the suburbs, the competition for housing is exacerbated by the loss of what’s often referred to as NOAH (for naturally occurring affordable housing), as more and more outside investors remodel old apartment complexes to attract higher-income tenants. The trend to convert such units has prompted a slew of new initiatives by cities to try to preserve as much NOAH housing as possible in future years.

An increased cost for labor, construction and land has also changed the market and created new challenges for what Dye calls, “mom and pop” landlords, who are generally more willing to accept Section 8 holders or make exceptions to their screening requirements, helping renters who may have poor credit, for example. 

“A lot of new construction in the private market and in even affordable housing is not for people in poverty — it’s not for people with extremely low incomes. It’s hard to get those [housing for people at the lowest end of the market] financed,” Dye said. “We’ve always had a shortage in this lower end, and it just kind of continues to get worse.”

The extent of the problem became apparent in June, when the region’s three biggest public housing agencies — Smith’s Metro HRA and the authorities for St. Paul and Minneapolis — opened their waitlists for Section 8 vouchers simultaneously. The hope was that the coordinated effort would increase the chance for eligible households of getting access to the program, and roughly 45,000 households applied for just 7,500 spots on the lists. The housing authorities’ computer-run lottery system will select who will get vouchers from the lists over the next several years.


“The need for rental assistance is clearly so much greater than the number of vouchers that any of us three [housing authorities] have,” said Louise Seeba, who helps lead the St. Paul Public Housing Agency. “Clearly the need is there for much, much more, and we’re doing everything that we can to be as efficient with our vouchers and have them placed.”

A push to recruit more landlords

In recent years, outside developers have found St. Louis Park an ideal location for building new housing that gives people a city-like experience without some of the same city-like expenses, according to Schnitker, the city’s housing supervisor.

But that upscaling has taken a toll on options for low-income renters. To address the problem, the city’s housing authority has a staff person who serves as a point of contact for maintaining relationships with landlords who could be eligible for running subsidized housing, hoping they eventually accept Section 8 vouchers. 

“We’re at a bit of an advantage because we have a housing authority that administers the voucher program,” unlike suburbs that have Section 8 administered by regional authorities, such as Metro HRA, Schnitker said. “Because of that we’re able to cultivate a really good relationship with our landlords.”

That push to recruit new landlords isn’t confined to St. Louis Park. Smith, of Metro HRA, said that in her 25-year career, she has never seen such a concerted effort among housing authorities and nonprofits to expand the pool of those accepting vouchers and help them manage Section 8 properties. 

Yet some advocates want cities to go beyond outreach. In 2017, the Minneapolis City Council approved an ordinance that requires property owners to accept Section 8. Property owners challenged the notion in court, arguing that state laws preempt the change and maintain their rights to picking tenants, though the Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled in the city’s favor last month

Nonprofits are also trying to help connect more low-income renters and property owners. Jaime Stampley, housing services director at Lutheran Social Services of Minnesota, said the organization maintains a database of property owners who have expressed any type of willingness to take vouchers. They also keep track of documents for renters and serve as a liaison to landlords. “If you miss that one peice of mail, you could miss the chance of a lifetime,” she said of people who sign up for the Section 8 waitlist.

For Shannon, who wants to use her voucher in Eden Prairie so that she can be closer to a sister who often takes her to medical appointments, the search for better housing remains ongoing. She learned of an ideal housing opportunity while reading a story in her local newspaper months ago. Immediately after reading the news story, she filled out paperwork and paid the application fee for a spot in the new Eden Prairie building, which hasn’t opened yet, hoping she would get on top of the waiting list. Her promptness initially seemed to have paid off she passed the initial screening for the unit but she said she is still waiting on the final word from the property owner, as the two parties negotiate timelines for moving in and payments.

“I feel like I’m just constantly having to struggle. I’m constantly having to fight,” she said of her search. “I just get so tired sometimes. I don’t want to deal with the battle.”

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (6)

  1. Submitted by lisa miller on 07/25/2019 - 02:12 pm.

    It used to be section 8 was for disabled and/or seniors. It has become a subsidy for companies that don’t pay enough or for families in need of more supports in terms of education/training. The elephant in the room is that there are many who don’t qualify and who then question why should their taxes go to subsidize others who chose to have children–not saying I agree, but that is the argument. At what point do we hold large businesses like Walmart accountable for a fair wage and benefits. Add to it, do we then rebuild support services in all areas even though there is a small need for them? How do we provide some choice in section 8 housing, but recognize the financial limitations and space issues. Another big question is why isn’t there more equitable funding of schools so all neighborhoods have quality education. These are just some of the tougher questions news articles tend to dance around.

  2. Submitted by Andrew Kearney on 07/25/2019 - 02:49 pm.

    Good article but what about the underlying cost of housing? Not enough attention has been given to the regulatory burden of developing and modifying housing. The new state building code alone must be responsible for a chunk of the cost of new housing. Is it any wonder that housing starts and sales are declining because more families can not afford to get into market priced housing? This puts pressure on programs like section 8.

    The building code was, I think, adopted by regulation and not by legislation. By that I mean a short piece of legislation authorized the executive branch to adopt a building code and they did so. This has been a trend wherein both parties attend to the issues that their base and the special interests with lots of cash promote and basic government issues such as how much are we going to charge to build a new house are left by the wayside. No wonder half the country (on both political sides) is up in arms against governments’ lack of interest in the basics in people’s lives in which the cost of housing is a BIG DEAL.

  3. Submitted by Betsy Larey on 07/25/2019 - 08:09 pm.

    A couple of things stand out. First, the woman in question wants to live in one of the most expensive suburbs in the Twin Cites. She doesn’t want to live in typical low income housing and wants a yard. I empathize with her medical condition, but when you are asking for government assistance i’m not sure if people should be able to be that picky.
    In addition, the Twin Cites is one of the most regulated cities in the country, hence the cost to build is so high. Think water, sewer, permits etc. If people want to build low income housing, then they need to start lobblying the state to dial back these outrageous costs.

  4. Submitted by Oskar Peterson on 07/26/2019 - 08:11 am.

    Another problem with Section 8 in the suburbs is public transportation. Many suburbs have very limited if any public transportation.

    • Submitted by Gerald Abrahamson on 07/26/2019 - 10:41 am.

      Transportation has been an issue for many decades, as a car is required if one chooses to live in the suburbs. However, that has changed as the availability of Uber and Lyft became generally available. This would particularly apply to those who are not able or willing to drive (retirees included). This also means services such as Metro Mobility can reasonably be used across the metro area. With the advent of self-driving cars, the demand for housing will shift to being area-wide (not just in certain neighborhoods), as the requirement to get to/from places becomes universal (anyone can get to/from anywhere else in the area from any reasonable housing location in the area).

      • Submitted by Oskar Peterson on 07/29/2019 - 07:55 am.

        Uber and Lyft are not really realistic transportation options for anyone on Section 8 – that need regular transportation to work/school.

        Metro Mobility serves a small percentage of Section 8 housing families.

        Self driving cars are likely to be purchased by those that can afford housing.

        There has to be regular, reliable bus/light rail service in the suburbs otherwise Section 8 housing in the suburbs will isolate those on Section 8. From my first ring suburb, it takes 3 bus transfers and over 2 hours to get to the U of M. That’s not very practical for anyone going to school or work.

Leave a Reply