Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


Mr. Dilettante: When will DFL candidates strike?

We’re now 3 weeks away from primary day in Minnesota and we still have no idea who will be the DFL standard-bearer against Tom Emmer in the general election. Up to now, the three candidates in question have been hesitant to pull out the knives against each other, preferring to establish their bona fides with the DFL electorate through ostentatious attacks on Emmer.

While that might be good for style points, eventually the candidates will need to start turning their attacks on one another.So, who’s likely to strike first? And who’s likely to be the person attacked?

The conventional wisdom is that Mark Dayton is leading right now. He would seem to be the person to attack. Both the endorsed candidate (Margaret Anderson Kelliher) and the unwanted candidate (Matt Entenza) will need to make a decision. Entenza, who has shown every willingness to throw an elbow in his career, certainly has the money to flood the airwaves with anti-Dayton ads in the next 3 weeks. The challenge Entenza faces is simple — he has very little goodwill within the party and if he attacks Dayton too vociferously, the attacks will then be available for the Emmer campaign if Entenza falls short, which still seems likely.

Dayton, who has even more money than Entenza, would likely feel compelled to return fire against Entenza. While it would be the proper response, it would stall whatever momentum he currently has.

Meanwhile, Kelliher sits with her endorsement and little else. She’s not likely to be attacked by the other two candidates and because her campaign has so little money, she can’t really afford to play on television beyond the gauzy introductory ads she’s run thus far. Meanwhile, her campaign has problems of its own, including the highly embarrassing failure to get the endorsement of NOW, which went to Entenza instead. She really has to do something to get the attention of the voters beyond the DFL foot soldiers who support the endorsed candidate above all else. The problem is this — historically there have not been enough DFL foot soldiers to elect an endorsed candidate. Paradoxically, it might be in her best interest to do nothing.

So what’s going to happen? Here’s my guess:

  • Look for Entenza to run ads that obliquely attack Dayton, while simultaneously turning his underlings loose with whatever oppo his campaign has managed to get on Brave Sir Mark.
  • Dayton’s team will try to stay above the fray, but Dayton’s thin skin will cause him to respond to Entenza, most likely in an overwhelming way that will not only defeat Entenza, but that could also end Entenza’s political career entirely.
  • Kelliher will largely sit things out and hope that the DFL field organization can get enough voters to the polls in August to eke out a victory over her wounded rivals. If Kelliher wants to study an election scenario that supports this approach, she ought to look at the 1992 Illinois Senate primary.

In the end, my guess is that Dayton will emerge from the wreckage with a thin victory over Kelliher. The question will be this: can the DFL regroup? Either way, it will be fun for those of us on the starboard side. Getcha popcorn.

This post was written by Mark Heuring and originally published on Mr. Dilletante’s Neighborhood.

Comments (3)

  1. Submitted by Diane Clare on 07/21/2010 - 09:45 am.

    More important than anything that any candidate might say about their opponents is, what is their own stand, what is their own agenda, what do they think they can do that makes them the candidate worthy of their constituents vote.

  2. Submitted by Richard Schulze on 07/21/2010 - 02:07 pm.

    It’s Dayton’s to lose. Although I disagree with much of what Dayton proposes, at least he has committed to some specific proposals.

    Kelliher on the other hand, should know the budget forwards and backwards. Yet she has chosen to address the budget by responding to Dayton’s proposals and not offering anything but generalities on her own behalf. I’m very disappointed in her performance thus far.

    I think Hiram Foster sums up Kelliher’s dilemma quite nicely. “It really is time for Margaret to decide whether it’s ice cream princess or governor she’s running for”. (HT to Hiram)

  3. Submitted by Sue Halligan on 07/23/2010 - 01:43 pm.

    I’m not sure when Matt Heuring posted this blog. But MinnPost’s editors should have caught the OOPS! re Margaret Kelliher’s “non-endorsement” by NOW. Your own Joe Kimball reported on June 20 that she, as well as Entenza, has been endorsed by Minnesota’s NOW.

Leave a Reply