Nonprofit, independent journalism. Supported by readers.


Steelworkers suffer big defeat in Mesabi Nugget vote

Last Friday, the United Steelworkers conceded defeat in the unionization vote at the Mesabi Nugget plant near Aurora.

Last Friday, the United Steelworkers conceded defeat in the unionization vote at the Mesabi Nugget plant near Aurora. The Mesabi Daily News had the story.

According to Mesabi Nugget the vote was 57-21. The vote took place over two days, included a complete unionization drive by the Steelworkers and was overseen by federal labor officials.

In an Iron Range region known as a labor bastion, the first question has to be how did this happen? And what does this mean?

Mesabi Nugget is among the newest iron ore processing facilities on the Range, using a modern process to create iron nuggets that are purer than taconite pellets. It opened after the early 2000s mining slowdown and before the big recession of 2008-2009.

Article continues after advertisement

Thus, the people working there were very happy to get those jobs. And why not? The pay has started at about $50,000 a year with a $75,000 a year average, plus incentive programs based on production. That’s really good pay on the Range, especially if you’ve strung together jobs at foundries, manufacturing companies or the like over the years. For a younger worker here, this is as good as it can get.

The union’s dominant argument seemed to center on safety. Union representation would mean a consistent eye on safety so that the rush to meet quotas for incentives didn’t threaten lives. But the workers simply opted for the good pay and a work environment they apparently like. That could change. But it didn’t sway the vote last week.

It’s hard to avoid the political ramifications. Private industry labor unions were the backbone of the region’s DFL political coalition from WWII to recently. With workforce reductions the mines are still the dominant employers, but in much smaller numbers than the ’70s. A modern mining job is better than ever, but less plentiful. As those jobs have become more technical, mines have become more precise in how they hire (you have to take a personality test, for instance). Those two factors taken together makes unionism harder to take hold.

Further, younger workers on the Iron Range have no personal memory of the kinds of working conditions that made unions as important as they once were. I know a lot of the folks just hired at the mines these days. I went to school with them. They’ve struggled through sluggish construction trades and attempts at self-employment for a decade; now these mines are paying good money. What’s a union?

This means that the DFL’s strongest ally — labor — is still alive, but weaker. All but one of the mines are still solidly union, but any union steward would tell you its harder to get people excited and active in the union these days because the pay is good. Several Range mine unions willingly voted away the eight-hour day because younger workers prefer longer shifts with more days off.

So, while the DFL has a socioeconomic and cultural advantage on the Range today it will have to dramatically retool its long-term strategy to hold its historic margins here.

Finally, the vote at Mesabi Nugget is one thing. But when looking ahead at future union votes on the Range — particularly at Essar Steel when it opens and any of the potential nonferrous mineral mines on the east Range — we have a real question. Can labor regroup and become relevant to newer workers, both young Rangers and those who come in from outside the area? That’s a daunting challenge.

The labor movement was absolutely critical to the growth and success of the middle class across America, particularly on the Iron Range. As labor has waned, so too have the fortunes of your average Range worker (remember, they don’t work at the mines). But the times are changing and it’s important for labor and free marketers alike to deal with the future in real terms.

This non-union vote at Mesabi Nugget could be marked as a major milestone on a shift that in ten years takes the 75 percent DFL Mesabi Range and makes it more like the DFL-leaning swing districts found on the Cuyuna Range north of Brainerd or in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. There are ways to avoid this fate but all involve something different happening than is currently happening.

Article continues after advertisement

This post was written by Aaron J. Brown and originally published on Minnesota Brown. Follow Aaron on Twitter: @minnesotabrown.

If you blog and would like your work considered for Minnesota Blog Cabin, please submit our registration form.