The Dayton administration, led by Transportation Commissioner Charlie Zelle, has been making a similar case for its $11 billion, ten-year transportation plan.

Raising the gas tax in Minnesota has never been an easy sell. Just ask Len Levine, state transportation commissioner under DFL Gov. Rudy Perpich. 

In 1988, thanks in no small part to Levine, the Legislature passed the largest transportation-funding package in its history — $390 million over three years, or roughly $800 million in today’s dollars.  The gas tax increased from 17 cents to 20 cents a gallon. 

But that happened only after 17 months of legislative lobbying, public-relations stunts, and retail politics, much of it executed by Levine.  

To demonstrate how bad the roads were in Mankato, for example, Levine got wired with an EKG monitor and went for a ride in an ambulance. “The roads were so bumpy, you couldn’t read the EKG at the end of ride, so imagine if I were a real patient,” Levine said.

“I went to areas of the state where there were accidents, tragic fatal accidents,” he said. “I talked to chamber groups, I went to schools in every congressional district and talked about the infrastructure and how those about-to-be drivers would benefit. It had an impact.”

The Dayton administration, led by Transportation Commissioner Charlie Zelle, has been making a similar case for its $11 billion, 10-year plan that includes a gas tax increase at the wholesale level as well as fee and sales tax increases. Dayton’s plan would add 22 cents at the wholesale level to the current gas tax of 28.5 cents a gallon.  

Even adjusted for inflation, it’s a bigger hike than Levine helped pass in 1988, and consumers have made their opposition known. A March Star Tribune poll found 52 percent of adults opposed raising the gas tax to pay for transportation needs, while only 45 percent supported it. 

“It’s very difficult to get an increase in transportation funding,” said Levine. “It turns people off because they don’t know what they get for it.”

Convincing the Legislature is more difficult, Levine said. Although DFLers controlled the Minnesota House in 1988, to get enough votes for passage Levine and his deputies hosted one-on-one lunches with lawmakers. “I made the argument that the road doesn’t know if it’s Democrat or Republican,” he said.

Len Levine
Len Levine

The Minnesota House would not approve another gas tax hike until 20 years later, after the collapse of the I-35W bridge in Minneapolis.

With less than a week until the end of the legislative session, Republican Speaker of the House Kurt Daudt maintains that the gas tax is a nonstarter. Senate Majority Leader Tom Bakk has suggested that the Legislature need not consider either a tax bill or transportation bill this session.

That puzzles Levine. “There seemed to be consensus that there needs to be improvement,” he said. “I would be hopeful that they will come up with some kind of compromise.” 

But, he said, a substantial funding package may be unobtainable. “A slight tax increase — it might work,” he said.   

Even a road warrior like Levine acknowledges that the gas tax remains a toxic topic. 

Join the Conversation

8 Comments

  1. No trust.

    Levine must understand the public doesn’t trust the government to use the money for the essential and mandated purposes?

    1. Exactly Why the Gas Tax

      The gas tax is constitutionally dedicated to roadway projects and only roadway projects, it will not be squandered or moved to a different fund. It is the only stable funding source we have for any transportation, and needs to be increased and indexed to inflation to keep up with rising costs.

  2. Roads & Bridges, Roads & Bridges, Roads & Bridges

    The three most important objectives of the 2015 Legislature are: Roads & Bridges, Roads & Bridges, Roads & Bridges! It is time for the DFL Senate & GOP House to get this job done!

  3. Run on it!

    Please have the DFL types make the gas tax and election issue. Run for election saying you want to raise the gas tax.

    We have been told for years that we need to raise taxes on the rich and not the middle class or the poor. However, the first thing the DFL try to do this session is raise taxes on the poor and middle class!

    1. Great idea Gotzman

      Let’s index how much a person has to pay of the gas tax based on their income.

  4. I’m not….

    a big fan of any new taxes. But as a higher income earner it’s nice to see a tax that hits lower wage earners the same as it hits me.

    1. Maybe we can convince them to raise the gas tax even higher and reduce our income tax rates… Or at least align the MN tax with the Feds to reduce the marriage penalty.

Leave a comment