Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


Michele Bachmann still against the stimulus bill, says haste makes waste

No surprise: Minnesota’s 6th District Republican Rep. Michele Bachmann continues her strong opposition to the stimulus bill, approved by the House and waiting Senate action.

In a statement before the House vote, she said:

“The level of disrespect we show the taxpayers today by asking Members to vote on a 1073-page bill with only 16-hours overnight to read and digest it is far exceeded by the level of disrespect we show the taxpayer by the substance of this package. As the Los Angeles Times stated in an editorial today, this bill ‘serves as a case study for the time-worn notion that haste makes waste.’

“The bill is supposed to have a single purpose: to stimulate the economy. Congress’ one and only criterion for any project or program should have been its ability to help grow the economy and help create jobs. But, whether by design or as a byproduct of the political wrangling to get the bill to the floor, this bill is more about political priorities than economic ones.

“Targeted investment in transportation and infrastructure construction is proven to grow the economy and create jobs. The U.S. Department of Transportation estimates that every $1 billion in federal highway investment, combined with required state matching funds, supports 34,779 American jobs. That’s why Republicans had moved to reprioritize spending in the House bill and triple investments in transportation construction — a motion the majority flatly rejected.

“Yet, this bill spends a scant 5.9% on transportation infrastructure — only just over half of that on actual highway construction. There’s more than twice as much for 33 brand new federal programs ($95 billion) and nearly twice as much in expansions of 73 programs that are typically part of the regular appropriations process ($92 billion) than for total infrastructure spending ($47 billion).

“Tax relief is similarly stimulative. The Republican alternative that was rejected by the majority would have created twice the jobs at half the cost. It would have done so by putting money back into the pockets of those who would use it to create jobs and to keep money cycling through the economy.

“But, 27% of what the majority calls ‘tax relief’ in this bill – and what the majority calls tax relief represents less than one-third of the total package – is actually federal spending disguised as tax relief. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that with their centerpiece tax provision an additional 5 million households would be added to the already 15 million that receive more money back from the IRS than they pay each year in income and payroll taxes combined.

“Accenting the misaligned priorities in this bill, only 0.28% of the total package — $2.2 billion – goes toward tax relief for small businesses. There’s almost as much money for tax credits for purchasing plug-in electric cars, which aren’t even on the market today. Again, our one and only criterion for determining inclusion in this bill should have been ‘economic stimulus.’

“With this bill today, Congress isn’t helping America to dig itself out of the recessionary hole, we’re merely digging it deeper. I cannot support this new direction for the American economy. I stand today on the side of the American taxpayer and will vote to oppose this bill.”

Comments (2)

  1. Submitted by Karl Bremer on 02/13/2009 - 04:04 pm.

    If anyone should know about disrespecting taxpayers, it’s Michele Bachmann. Our esteemed congresswoman has but one committee assignment in Congress–Financial Services–yet she couldn’t be bothered to show up this week when the committee dragged eight bank CEOs before them to grill them about where the hundreds of billions of dollars in TARP money has gone.

    Nor could Bachmann be bothered to show up for her Financial Services Committee hearing earlier this month when they dragged SEC officials before them to investigate the Bernie Madoff $50-billion Ponzi scheme scandal.

    Instead, Bachmann finds the time to go on Thug Radio with a cretin who last summer urged St. Paul Police to use machine guns and ax handles on RNC protesters. Sadly, this is what we’ve come to expect from a representative who has yet to hold a single public meeting in the district she purports to represent.

    And for this we pay her $174,000 a year–plus thousands of dollars in federal farm subsidies.

    Speaking of pay raises, I wonder when fiscal hawk Bachmann is going to join her Democratic colleagues Tim Walz and Colin Peterson as a cosponsor of legislation to reject her most recent $4,700 pay raise?

  2. Submitted by Paul Brandon on 02/14/2009 - 09:47 pm.

    When elephants fly?

Leave a Reply