Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


Catholic bishops urge budget deal that helps poor and vulnerable

Minnesota’s Catholic bishops are out with another statement today urging lawmakers to settle the budget dispute and enact policies that “prioritize the needs of the poor and vulnerable, as well as promote human dignity and the common good.”

They’d also like to see some conservative social issues included in a budget agreement.

In the statement, Archbishop John C. Nienstedt of the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis, said:

“We do not endorse any particular plan. Rather, we propose an ethical and moral framework based on Catholic social teaching in the hope of moving the discussion in the right direction.”

The bishops said they worry that spending cuts suggested to balance the budget “will fall disproportionately on the backs of the poor and vulnerable — particularly children, the elderly, and disabled.”

The statement said legislators should protect the state’s General Assistance program and the Minnesota Family Investment Program.

“Ensuring the welfare of all Minnesotans is a core function of government,” said Jason Adkins, executive director of the Minnesota Catholic Conference, the public policy voice of the Catholic Church in Minnesota. “Although controlling spending and putting the state on sound fiscal footing are important goals, those with limited means should not be shouldering that responsibility, especially as politicians continue to load budgets with tax loopholes, subsidies, and spending projects that serve narrow special interests.”

And the bishops said that, in addition to protecting programs that serve as safety nets for the poor and vulnerable, a budget solution should also include:

  • An end to taxpayer funding of abortions for women receiving state medical assistance
  • Bans on human cloning and State funding for cloning research
  • A tuition tax credit for parents of children attending non-public schools
  • Opportunity scholarships for students in underperforming public schools to attend private school.

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (5)

  1. Submitted by David Greene on 07/12/2011 - 06:14 pm.

    “They’d also like to see some conservative social issues included in a budget agreement.”

    As a faithful Catholic, let me say one thing:


  2. Submitted by Neal Rovick on 07/13/2011 - 09:31 am.

    “Muddying the message”?

    What did Jesus talk about?

    Feeding the hungry, or tax breaks?

    Healing the sick, or banning stem-cell research?

    Clothing the naked, or vouchers?

    Comfort the grieving, or abortion?

    What is fundamental and what is overlaid?

    Jesus came to make clear what was apparently unclear to the Jews. He spoke directly about some things and did not mention others. Somehow now, the things he never talked about have become the most important. If the Jews did not get it right after 2000 years, thereby requiring the coming of Jesus, what makes you so sure Christians are getting it right after another 2000 years?

  3. Submitted by Steve Wilson on 07/13/2011 - 09:37 am.

    … and also with you, David 🙂

    Once again the “leaders” of our faith get it partly right. They just can’t resist the urge to lob a grenade (or four) into the pile.

  4. Submitted by Bernice Vetsch on 07/13/2011 - 03:07 pm.

    How unfortunate that the bishops want to tie funding meant to ease human suffering to the passage of right-wing sectarian legislation.

    And therefore, of course, to encourage voting for the right-wing religious fundamentalists who would pass that legislation.

  5. Submitted by Jean Schiebel on 07/13/2011 - 06:21 pm.

    The Bishops can’t have it both ways..if they want social Conservatives elected they are also going to get Legislators who will protect the Corporations and the wealthy over the vulnerable.
    I have never read such hypocritical junk in my life.

Leave a Reply