Religious coalition joins fight against Minnesota’s voting amendment

A coalition of faith groups on Thursday joined the main campaign opposing the voter amendment and promised to engage 50,000 religious voters before November in the uphill fight against the ballot question.

The statewide network of faith leaders and congregations, known as Prophetic Voices, includes Jewish, Muslim and Christian members. The religious coalition said it’s incumbent on people of faith to oppose the voting ballot question because it could disenfranchise at-risk voters, such as the poor, elderly, students and the disabled.

“We are working together to build a movement of people of faith in Minnesota who are committed to working for racial and economic justice, but our most urgent work in the coming months is to work together to educate and organize … religious voters in Minnesota to vote no on the voter restriction amendment,” said Doran Schrantz, executive director of ISAIAH, which is part of the effort.

“Other people will not say it as clear and concise as I will,” said the Rev. Jerry McAfee, president of the Minnesota State Baptist Convention. “It is my opinion that voter suppression and voter restriction is shrouded in racism.”

The groups expect to employ typical campaign tactics — phone banks, door-knocking and direct mailings — but will also host forums following religious services. Schrantz said direct contact between religious leaders and their congregants offer a unique opportunity to sway voters because they’re in a comfortable place.

Schrantz didn’t offer up a specific budget or spending target for the initiative but said member groups would offer in-kind services and existing resources would be repurposed. The coalition is partnering with the established Our Vote Our Future campaign, which is the main force opposing the amendment.

“This is too important to not address,” she said.

It’s unclear for now how the marriage amendment, which is heavily backed by Catholic organizations, will interplay with these religious groups’ efforts, but Schrantz said she doesn’t foresee a huge interaction.

“Churches and congregations and different denominations are in different places around the question of both amendments,” she said. “Churches and congregations are making their own decisions about how the interplay does or does not work in their congregations … what we’re working on is the voter restriction amendment … the organizations represented here have that in common.”

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (4)

  1. Submitted by Dennis Tester on 09/14/2012 - 08:53 am.

    It seems to me

    that if these people are overtly telling their congregations how to vote, that’s a violation of the law and they should have their tax exemption pulled because they’re no longer a religious organization but a political one. Not that we ever thought McAfee, et al was otherwise.

    • Submitted by Logan Foreman on 09/14/2012 - 09:18 am.

      Tester – please

      Continue your analysis as it relates to the archbishop and the marriage amendment. His “employees” are told that they are not even entitled to freedom of speech on that topic.

  2. Submitted by Paul Brandon on 09/14/2012 - 09:42 am.

    No, Dennis–

    It’s a violation of the IRS regulations if a religious leader speaking from the pulpit tells her congregation WHO to vote for. There is no restriction on discussing issues.
    This is a ballot, not an amendment.

  3. Submitted by chuck carlin on 09/14/2012 - 10:33 am.

    Religious instruction

    Perhaps the “instructional aspect” coming from the pulpit should also be applied to the actions of the Cathollic Archdiocese in regard to the other proposed amendment.

Leave a Reply