Skip to Content

Support MinnPost

Pitches to extend sales tax to online purchases and clothing aired

Sen. Ann Rest
Sen. Ann Rest

Democrats are beginning to flesh out the tax proposals they listed as a priority heading into this legislative session.

A key Senate committee heard plans Wednesday to tax clothing and extend the sales tax to certain Internet transactions. DFL Sen. Ann Rest, who is heading up tax change efforts in the Senate, brought a few preliminary proposals forward that could eventually be included in a larger tax package.

The online sales plan has surfaced several times in recent years and has the support of retailers and Minnesota’s business community. Rest said the plan would raise about $4.5 million in its first year.

“The Amazon bill,” as it’s often called, is also an issue at the federal level, Rest said. “We’re not trying to cast aspersions on a company I’ve spent many a dollar on.”

The Minnesota Retailers Association, the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and the League of Minnesota Cities all testified in support of the legislation. Amazon lists two registered lobbyists with the Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board, but no representative testified on the bill.

“I’m not whining. I’m not complaining. It’s just fact,” said Roberta Bonoff, CEO of Creative Kidstuff, a Minnetonka company, in supporting the extension. “No matter how you make a sale, you should pay taxes.”

Gov. Mark Dayton has supported the “Amazon bill” in the past. Lawmakers and “bricks-and-mortar” businesses alike said the measure is important in leveling the playing field for Minnesota companies.

Rest also put forward two measures that would extend the state sales tax to clothing.

One would levy a tax on an article of clothing on the cost above $200. The other would repeal the clothing sales tax exemption and offer tax credits based on income. Both proposals are currently revenue neutral.

Retailers who spoke in support of taxing Internet purchases came back to oppose expanding the sales tax to clothing. Maureen Bausch, a VP with Mall of America, told the committee that many tourists come to Minnesota and spend money because of the sales tax exemption.

“If we add this tax on apparel, it will absolutely affect our tourism,” she said.

“We hear a lot of ideas, a lot of proposals, lay them over and eventually we put together an omnibus bill,” Rest said after the hearing.

Senate Taxes Committee Chairman Rod Skoe said he’s not a fan of expanding the sales tax.

Rest said she wanted to keep the proposals revenue neutral – Democrats agree that there will be tax hikes this session – so that discussion didn’t get bogged down in debating how much new funding lawmakers should attempt to raise. The Democrat from New Hope said she’s waiting for Dayton’s budget, which will be released Tuesday.

“Once we have the governor’s bills, the whole thing will explode in terms of what we’re going to be looking at,” Rest said. “It’s clear we’re going to have some revenue raises. What is the governor’s vision for dealing with the structural deficit … and then secondly his vision for this 21st century economy?”

Republicans on the committee offered some support for the online tax bill but pushed back against expanding sales taxes. GOP Sen. Julianne Ortman, formerly the Senate Taxes Committee chairwoman, said Minnesotans should watch out for skyrocketing tax bills while the Legislature is under DFL leadership.

“It seems like the DFL has proposed every new tax conceivable for Minnesotans,” she said after the hearing. “It seems to be indiscriminate from my point of view.”

Get MinnPost's top stories in your inbox

Related Tags:

Comments (4)

Internet sales tax

The fact that the sales tax is not applied to many internet transactions has always been one of my pet peeves. It always seemed to me that such a policy has it exactly wrong. It discriminates against local corporate citizens, companies that are present and invested in our community, that provide wonderful places for us to shop and work. Such policies benefit companies that make it a point not to be present in our community, who never in any way make the contribution to our local well being made by every single company who does business here.

Sales Tax

My problem is what determines what tax rate to charge.

Last I checked there were 30,000 +/- sales taxes in the USA.

We waste way too much time just keeping track and calculating the dozen or so different Minnesota Sales taxes.

For a Washington County mail order, we have to get out a map and plot the address to determine the sales tax.

Until there is a national interstate sales tax rate or a usable, affordable rate calculator, its a big problem for the Ma and Pa store.

Even the State of Minnesota can't do it for Minnesota.
Warning: The Sales Tax Rate Calculator only includes rates and boundaries for Minnesota and local general sales and use taxes. It does not include the special local taxes administered by the Department (Minneapolis lodging, entertainment or downtown liquor and restaurant taxes, the St. Cloud liquor and food tax, or the Rochester and St. Paul lodging taxes). If any of the special local taxes administered by the Department apply to a sale, you will need to add the special local tax rate(s) to the general sales and use tax rate identified by the rate calculator to determine the total tax rate to charge on the sale. For information on these special local taxes and tax rates, please see Fact Sheet 164S, Special Local Taxes.

Anti-Business Sales Tax

Sorry, a MN internet sales tax will not "level the playing field". It's only going to harm the many smaller online businesses who are making a living selling on eBay, Amazon, Etsy, and on their own websites. eBay and Amazon customers will simply choose a different seller who doesn't have to charge MN sales tax, and MN small business will suffer.

Internet Sales Tax

The article tells us little on what exactly MN has planned to require out-of-state Sales Tax collection. The 'Amazon Tax' is widely known as expanding nexus rules to include 'click-thru' Nexus. Bad law as in many States like NC and CT have seen a loss of revenue rather than an increase, and was overturned in a court challenge in IL.

The 1992 Quill decision prohibits any State Law attempting to force online to collect Tax unless the company has a physical presence within the State. Only Congress can address this issue.

Few think outside their own back yard. As an online retailer located in S.C., we want our Sales Tax too. I'm sure that online sellers in MN would enjoy complying with our 150+ tax districts (none defined by zip code) as well as the tax exemptions/additions on various class of goods. It is unreasonable to expect a NY seller to be required to know what items are taxed in Minneapolis, but not in St. Paul, even when those locations share the same zip code.