The Holiday Present Quandary: iPods and iPhones for your Wii little children?

Customers wait in line to purchase the Wii game console
REUTERS/Brendan McDermid
Customers waited in line last month to purchase the Wii game console outside the Nintendo store in midtown Manhattan.

 

Hannah Roberts was only 6 when the words lifted from her lips: “I want an iPod.”

Her parents, iPod owners who had given their daughter a hand-me-down Dell laptop when she was 4, were not surprised. They weren’t opposed to the request either.

Hannah’s mom surveyed used iPods on Craigslist, reporting that the lowest price was around $50. Then Hannah set to saving, stashing spare change and bills in a nightstand drawer. Her seventh birthday netted $30 from Great-grandma Ruth and $5 from Great-aunt Betty. Cleaning the bathroom earned the final $5, and then, with help from Mom and Dad, Hannah purchased a used iPod nano.

Her mom locks the volume to limit hearing damage and actively monitors the music. She’s rejected Justin Timberlake’s “SexyBack” and the Black Eyed Peas’ “My Humps.” But for a 7-year-old, Hannah sports a fairly eclectic iTune collection, ranging from the Beach Boys to the Cheetah Girls.

Purchasing an iPod has taught Hannah responsibility, says Rebecca Roberts, a St. Paul mom. “She takes good care of her iPod, and she’s very mindful of not leaving it in the car.”

Plus there’s the financial lesson: “I think Hannah understands that if you save up, even a dollar here and two dollars there, it eventually adds up to a nicer, larger-ticket item. She doesn’t need to spend her money as soon as she gets it, which she used to do.”

High-tech toys for holiday season?
Roberts’ ability to turn a worrisome request into a positive result bears considering this holiday season. The dense field of rapidly evolving, high-tech and high-priced toys has made holiday shopping harder than ever. Parents must determine what is a reasonable gadget at a reasonable price for a reasonable age.

Negotiating these decisions requires thorough research, careful deliberation and a measure of good luck: that the Nintendo’s popular game console Wii doesn’t break, that a cooler version doesn’t come out in February, or that your son’s best friend doesn’t get one after you’ve ruled it out.

There are hidden costs behind every price tag. Extra games, additional cables, increased memory and extended warranties can quickly add $100 or $200 to the cost of an electronic.

There are misleading claims, too. A promise that a digital photo frame holds 150 pictures, for instance, depends on the size of the pictures.

Not to mention service plans. The iPhone costs $399, but the minimal monthly service fee is $60, raising the actual cost of one year’s use to more than $1,000. And the one-year warranty included in the iPhone purchase doesn’t cover an owner who drops or breaks the mobile device.

This doesn’t deter some parents, says Joseph Schwartz, a sales representative at the AT&T Store at the Mall of America, where the iPhone is a hot attraction.

Half a dozen parents bought iPhones for their children’s Christmas gifts before Halloween, Schwartz says. Now it’s really busy. One out of five customers is 15 or younger, a demographic that finds the iPhone irresistible, he saysd. “If you have the iPhone, people are going to stop and ask you about it, so young people like the attention it attracts.”

Understanding the iPhone’s functions is not a prerequisite to coveting it, Schwartz adds. “Youngsters don’t grasp the features if offers,” he says, “but they’re very willing to learn.”

Teens and preteens resort to a wide range of arguments to persuade their parents they deserve an iPhone, showing a preference for playing the academic card. “If a mom is saying no and a teen is arguing, it’s probably, ‘Well, I could use the Internet on here if our Internet breaks down. I could download research and type a school paper on here,’ ” he says.

Price points can complicate decisions
Lower-priced electronics also can confuse discerning parents. Jan Storms, a Shoreview mom, recently bought a digital photo frame, and now she’s struggling to compare it with digital frames at other stores. Does a lower price, she wonders, mean lower quality? Meanwhile, the most critical measuring stick appears absent: None of the frames she’s examined state their memory capacity.

“I don’t want to pay $79 for emptiness!” Storms said.

In other cases, vast storage is unnecessary. Dave Bins, an IBM network analyst from Eagan, is shopping for a reasonably sized iPod for his 13-year-old son Michael. “I’m looking at the 4-gigabyte nanos because they’re a little cheaper, and he really doesn’t need something that’s going to hold 2 zillion songs instead of 1 zillion.”

The iPod will be Michael’s second. Last summer, he jumped into the Atlantic Ocean with a month-old iPod and a Crazr phone in his pockets, ruining both. “It was a very expensive little dip in the ocean,” Bins says.

He’s relieved that Michael doesn’t want an iPhone, which his 13-year-old friend has.

Most people consider 13 too young to own such a product, but what about an older teen? Jack Basten, 17, a Mounds View High School junior from North Oaks, has far more cell-phone experience and considers himself a responsible iPhone owner. His mom bought him an iPhone the second day it was available, linking the $499 purchase to his upcoming birthday.

The teen’s response to the iPhone indicates he’s not the ideal owner. “I like being able to play music, and going on the Internet from pretty much anywhere is a nice thing. If I had a bet with my friends or something, I can just type it into my phone,” he says. “I was depressed by its lack of games, but I suppose it’s a professional type of phone.”

Basten has never lost his iPhone, though he has dropped it on the carpet multiple times and once on the road, which left a scratch.

“I feel a little spoiled ’cause my parents just gave it to me, and I didn’t put any work into it,” he says. “But I try not to show it off, so I’m using it for its purposes; I’m not trying to use it to be cooler.”

Christina Capecchi writes about culture and the social impact of technology. Capecchi can be reached at ccapecchi [at] minnpost [dot] com.

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (2)

  1. Submitted by catharine ries on 12/06/2007 - 07:43 pm.

    This is an absolutely great article, for starters. A great anecdote about
    the young ipod owner. It’s very well written by obviously a
    well-accomplished reporter.
    I would like to comment, however, on your website. I feel you are driving
    away prospective comments by requiring us to register first. Personally, I
    feel a little weird giving out my first and last name as well as my email
    and hometown. (Besides, geographic information is available via Google
    Analytics.) I feel this is an excessive amount of information to mandate for
    one comment, and more comments could improve your paper.
    I realize you are a new paper and still getting the hang of everything. I am
    leaving this information to help; normally I would never give so much
    information for a comment.
    Thank you for reading this, and again, you have an amazing reporter on your
    hands.

  2. Submitted by Joel Kramer on 12/06/2007 - 07:47 pm.

    I’m glad you enjoyed Christina’s article, and thanks for sharing your thoughts about our comment policy. We know that requiring registration and real names for comments reduces the number of comments, but we believe it raises their quality. MinnPost.com has now been publishing for nearly a month, and more than 250 comments have been posted. These comments have generally been quite thoughtful, civil, relevant and informative. At websites that allow people to comment without real names, you’re likely to read many comments that, to put it politely, don’t meet those standards, even if the website screens comments before publishing them. So we think the policy is accomplishing the purpose — which is to make MinnPost.com a safe place to go to share perspectives and knowledge about our stories. By the way, we don’t publish your email address; we require the address so we can contact commenters if necessary.

Leave a Reply