Dark stars: Light pollution fills metro sky

The star forming region LH 95 in the nearby Large Magellanic Cloud galaxy.
Hubble Heritage Team, NASA
The star forming region LH 95 in the nearby Large Magellanic Cloud galaxy.

A star is moving from west to east — between Gemini and the Beehive Cluster — and becoming increasingly intense.

“It’s getting brighter…there it goes, there it goes…Here we go. Alright! Look at that!”

About a dozen die-hard amateur astronomers have gathered at Onan Observatory in Baylor Regional Park, 25 miles southwest of the Twin Cities, to observe an iridium flare, which occurs when the sun reflects off a passing satellite in the night sky.

“That’s fireworks. Way better than the Fourth of July. Celestial fireworks!”

Then Steve Emert, vice president of the Minnesota Astronomical Society, sees a pinkish glow in the sky — a dome of light going up about 20 degrees above the horizon.

“Only trouble is…that’s east,” Emert said. “That’s definitely not the sunset.”

It’s light pollution, and a key reason why these celestial addicts have traveled well outside the Twin Cities for their star party. It’s now almost impossible to clearly see stars in the night sky from within the Twin Cities and nearby suburbs.

Using satellite imagery and a digital density population map, scientists estimate that 99 percent of the U.S. population (and two-thirds of the world’s population) live under light-polluted skies. About 70 percent of the U.S. population can no longer see the Milky Way because of light pollution.

Light-colored glow
Most light pollution comes from outdoor lighting. The scattered light creates a light-colored glow that illuminates the sky, making it difficult to see the stars.

Ron Schmit, who teaches  astronomy education at the Science Museum of Minnesota in St. Paul and works at  the Onan Observatory, said that if the night sky is clear outside the Twin Cities, about 2,000 stars can be seen from the  observatory.

“If you go downtown [Minneapolis/St. Paul], you can only see about 20 stars…maybe a hundred if you’re lucky,” he said.

As a result, more astronomers like Elliot McKinley are now taking their telescopes out of town.

McKinley said that 20 years ago Onan would have been considered a dark sky site. Not anymore.

Onan, like other observatories around Minnesota, is threatened by the light of growing suburban development. “People keep moving out, subdivisions keep building up, municipalities keep throwing up wasted light” McKinley said.

Light pollution “keeps pushing us further and further out,” he said. “To do serious work and to really enjoy the sky … you have to go maybe another hour out of town.” 

McKinley, like other serious astronomers, will make trips to remote, pristine dark sky areas around the country — mainly out west. Tucson, Ariz., is considered a top destination, partly for its proximity to Kitt Peak National Observatory. Tucson is also headquarters of the International Dark Sky Association, one of the world’s largest resource centers on light pollution.

Arizona has been a leader in fighting light pollution. Fifty years ago, the Flagstaff City Council banned advertising search lights to protect the night sky for astronomers.

Lighting up space
Michael Kauper, a Minneapolis advocate for light pollution policy who has taught astronomy to children for more than 30 years, said the United States annually sends what amounts to $4 billion to $5 billion of light into space by way of street lighting. “Nobody sees it except the astronauts.”

Robert Gehrz, professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Minnesota, said any kind of bulb left uncovered will emit in all directions — “up as well as down.” But street lights — especially high-powered security lights — create the most waste of light and energy because they light so much of the air above.

Gehrz and others concerned about light pollution want city planners to adopt policies that would require directing the wasted light away from the sky and pinpointing it where it would do the most good.

The switchover to full cutoff lighting (fixtures that prevent upward light and minimize glare) is gaining attention at the Minnesota Legislature. House Rep. Phyllis Kahn, DFL-Minneapolis, has been working on a bill that would introduce a model lighting ordinance.

Kahn said smaller Minnesota cities have developed new lighting ordinances, but metros areas are lagging behind. New lights around the Metrodome and Guthrie theater are especially bad, she said, as are the lights at the University of Minnesota’s Science Education building. 

“One of the problems we have with this issue is that very few people understand it,” Kahn said.

Kahn and other advocates try to frame light pollution as an energy conservation issue, but many conservationists just nod their heads. That’s because light pollution comes across as abstract.

“They don’t think it’s like a river being polluted,” Kahn said.

Still, several metro area cities are adopting new lighting standards. Maplewood, Plymouth and Golden Valley now require developers to submit lighting plans.

But there’s little uniformity in the regulations. 

Maplewood, for example, focuses on curbing light glare, which primarily addresses aesthetic and nuisance problems. Plymouth, meanwhile, focuses on light wattage, which addresses the amount of energy used.

But if there’s a Minnesota city that’s lighting the way, it’s Mankato.

Mankato’s ordinance was amended in 1997, and addresses brightness, photometrics (where the light is being cast), the illumaire design (the area where the light shines), and the enclosure where the light is being cast.

“Lighting really takes up the lion’s code,” said city planning assistant Jon Noerenberg.

Public safety issue
In Minneapolis, lighting and public safety are closely connected.  “Our priority is safety for people walking on the sidewalks and using the street,” said John Wertjes, director of traffic control and safety for the city.

But more lighting doesn’t always necessarily translate to safety, said Robert Otterstatter, president and CEO of the Community Development Crime Prevention Institute in Washington, D.C.

“We tend to think that lighting at night equals safety,” Otterstatter said. “There are no conclusive studies to how that crime goes down in lighting. Criminals want to be able to see what they’re doing.”

While cities debate the pros and cons of new lighting rules, stargazers worry that fewer and fewer stars can be seen the metro-area skies. The Minnesota Astronomical Society is looking to for a new stargazing site even further out than Onan.

On the night of my visit, not long after seeing the iridium flare, I drove  away from the observatory in near total darkness.

Within a few minutes I was on the edge of a small neighboring, where a local convenience store shined like a flare. It could be seen for miles, light shining in all four directions.

Suddenly, I could no longer see the stars.

Julie Wilbert is a freelance writer in St. Paul and just bought her first telescope.

Comments (4)

  1. Submitted by Drew Geraets on 07/18/2008 - 08:44 pm.

    Very nice story Julie. How’d you come up with the idea? Also, not sure how old it is, but NASA has a cool satellite shot of the world’s light pollution.

  2. Submitted by John N. Finn on 07/18/2008 - 08:39 pm.

    The above “sane” comment comes from, I assume, a follower of a certain St. Paul columnist and radio commentator who delights in belittling those concerned with environmental matters. The columnist frequently singles out this particular politician due to his desire to fit in with the noise polluters (Harley bikers) that hold a long standing grudge with her for past legislative transgressions.

    I’m no astronomer, but nevertheless think my town’s environment could be improved if outdoor lighting could be more thoughtfully and considerately designed.

  3. Submitted by Ron Gotzman on 07/18/2008 - 02:01 pm.

    Please run for office on this “light pollution” platform or try and find a sane politician to run with this agenda.

  4. Submitted by Joe Musich on 07/20/2008 - 10:21 pm.

    Well here it is again. For years the old rubarb of more light safer environment gets brought into the discussion regarding light pollution. This time at least there is a counterpoint. Thank you. Now really make my “night” by drawing connections to the energy industry and the growth of outdoor lighting by both the public and private sector. Kind of like bring them electrical power and they will come. Do we really need lights on 24/7 at the Mall of Am parking lots ? There is a reason at least in my mind as to why this conservation of energy is having such a difficult time getting a hearing in public. Someone is going to lose money and power. No pun intended. It’s time to see the stars. They in fact are the canary in the coal mine.

Leave a Reply