Why are key details in documents from the bailout secret?

The U.S. Treasury Department has decided against publicly releasing key details of the contract it awarded Bank of New York Mellon to keep the books for the government’s purchase of toxic securities. In a publicly released copy of the contract, the Treasury blacked out how much it will pay the bank for its role in the government’s $700 billion taxpayer-funded bailout.

The Washington Post first briefly noticed the redactions. Meanwhile, Bailoutsleuth, a site created by Mavericks owner Mark Cuban, has been tracking the redactions and flagging more examples.

The government’s justification for blacking out the monthly fees set in the publicly bid contract aren’t clear.

“It looks like a reflexive, ‘we don’t want to tell you,'” said Steven Aftergood, director of the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists. “I just don’t see the rationale.”

Aftergood explained that the Freedom of Information Act allows the government to redact information for reasons including privacy and proprietary concerns, neither of which apparently applies in this case, he said.

Privacy exemption
A privacy exemption would allow the government to black out the names and salaries of specific Bank of New York Mellon employees, but not the bank’s fee. And a proprietary exemption applies while the contract is being competitively bid, a process that ended last week with the selection of the bank, the world’s largest custodian of assets.

“If it were challenged, I believe they would eventually be compelled to reveal the information,” Aftergood said.

A Treasury spokesperson did not return our phone calls. But Treasury officials have previously told the Post that they will reveal the terms once other contracts related to the bailout have been negotiated.

The government released the redacted contract one day after a Treasury Department official touted the bailout plan’s transparency.

“Consistent with Congress’ intent, we are committed to transparency and oversight in all aspects of the program,” said Neel Kashkari, the Treasury’s Interim Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability.

That same day, the Treasury compelled Bank of New York Mellon to take a $2 billion infusion of cash in exchange for preferred stock.

Government officials have called Bank of New York Mellon the “prime contractor” of the Treasury’s purchase program. Specifically, the bank will run the auctions used by the government to purchase distressed assets, then hold, track and value those securities. It also will keep track of executive compensation limits.

The bank beat out other big banks JPMorgan Chase and Northern Trust for the contract. In total, 70 firms vied for the deal.

Ben Protess reports for ProPublica, an independent and non-profit newsroom.

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (2)

  1. Submitted by Loretta Holscher on 10/23/2008 - 06:15 pm.

    This is a copy of a letter recently sent to Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi in regard to her share of the “bail out”.

    Congresswoman Pelosi,

    I have been a Democrat all my life, twice a delegate to the Democratic National Convention. I was recently sent an e-mail that I found very disturbing.

    Facts:

    Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi’s home district includes San Francisco.

    Star-Kist Tuna’s headquarters are in San Francisco, Pelosi’s home district.

    Star-Kist is owned by Del Monte Foods and is a major contributor to Pelosi.

    Star-Kist is the major employer in American Samoa employing 75% of the Samoan workforce.

    Paul Pelosi, Nancy’s husband, owns $17 million dollars of Star-Kist stock.

    In January, 2007 when the minimum wage was increased from $5.15 to $7.25, Pelosi had American Samoa exempted from the increase so Del Monte would not have to pay the higher wage. This would make Del Monte products less expensive than their competition’s.

    Last week when the huge bailout bill was passed, Pelosi added an earmark to the final bill adding $33 million dollars for an ‘economic development credit in American Samoa’.

    Pelosi has called the Bush Administration ‘corrupt’.

    She should know.

    The Star-Kist matter was big news at the beginning of 2007, and the $33 million earmark was news last week. Here are the links referring to this matter.

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2007/jan/12/20070112-120720-2734r/
    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/10/03/MNR813AHDN.DTL

    Your actions are less than honorable and exude the greed that Americans are fed up with. I will urge a movement to unseat you from states away. You can run, but you can’t hide.

    Loretta Holscher
    A Disappointed American Citizen in Minnesota

  2. Submitted by Tom Poe on 10/23/2008 - 08:22 pm.

    Paulson is definitely going through an identity crisis. One more reason to conclude we did, in fact, execute an entitlement to the Party of Corporate Welfare. America does not tolerate corporate welfare. Disgorgement is the operative word, here.

Leave a Reply