A sentinel for Fort Snelling

March 1958: The author's mother, LaVonne Watson, and her sister Elizabeth's eighth birthday party with neighborhood children.
Photo courtesy of Catherine Watson
March 1958: The author’s mother, LaVonne Watson, and her sister Elizabeth’s eighth birthday party with neighborhood children.

Fort Snelling never saw a military battle, but for the past 35 years, much of it has nonetheless been fighting for its life. Its enemies have been time, neglect and a federal deed that kept the historic buildings of its Upper Post in limbo.
But if plans announced this summer come true, the tide of its long battle may finally be turning.

It’s been a mighty complicated tide. With the rest of my family, I’ve been caught in its current for 60 years — ever since my father took a job with the Veterans Administration after World War II.

Soon after, we moved into what had been military housing at Fort Snelling, which had been demilitarized and was then in VA hands. In one way or another, the place has been on my mind ever since.

Nobody lives there now — my parents moved away in 1973, when the Veterans Administration pulled out and the Upper Post began its long decline.

But those of us who grew up at the fort continue to be its landless constituency: We keep an eye on the Upper Post, and three of us — my sister, one of our childhood friends and I — went there for an unusual outdoor press conference on July 28.

About 1955: Author, her father Richard Watson and brother Steven prepare for the first day of school.
Photo courtesy of Catherine Watson
About 1955: Author, her father Richard Watson and brother Steven prepare for the first day of school.

The agencies represented that day could be an index to the fort’s history: the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the National Park Service, the Mdewakanton Dakota Nation, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, the Minnesota Preservation Alliance, the Veterans Administration, the Minnesota Historical Society and, crucially, Hennepin County. 

“These buildings can be saved!’’ said Hennepin County Commissioner Peter McLaughlin, for whom saving the fort has become a personal cause, and everyone applauded. I applauded too, even though I was there as a reporter. On any other subject I could stay objective. Not on this one.

Living history in a fort 
When you live inside an actual fort, historical reality gets in your blood, and you become, without knowing it, a history buff and a historic preservationist. It happened to everyone in my family, including the adults, and all of our friends. It’s more than nostalgia, and it’s something you don’t outgrow.   
My family lived in Fort Snelling for more than a quarter century, part of a strange little VA community known as Tower Town, after the fort’s most significant landmark — the gray stone Round Tower, circa 1820, which stood in what we called The Point, overlooking the valley where the Mississippi and Minnesota Rivers meet.

Today, Minnesotans know The Point as Historic Fort Snelling, the pitch-perfect living-history restoration run by the Minnesota Historical Society. 

The much-larger Upper Post — where we lived — is that mysterious string of abandoned brick buildings that runs along the bluff above the Minnesota River between the Mendota Bridge and the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport.
At any given time, only about 500 people lived in the VA’s Tower Town, and about 200 of them were kids. Buffered from the rest of the Twin Cities by the airport, the woods and the rivers, it was a child’s paradise, where we wandered, explored and acted out adventures in a kind of time-warp safety that seems impossible now — and which, of course, we took for granted.   

Life in the fort gave us something else we took for granted: history. It was all around us, all the time. I don’t even remember having to study it in school, though we must have. I think it just came in through our pores.

We lived in historic houses; we looked out our bedroom windows at historic views; we even played in historic places. One kid’s mom had the keys to the Round Tower, and it wasn’t hard to get in. 
Despite its age, Tower Town in the 1950s and 1960s had all the perks of a plush Army base, with none of the negatives. Government workers mowed the lawns and maintained all the buildings — not just our houses, but also tennis courts, an ice rink, the Cavalry Drill Hall, the polo grounds, an Olympic-sized swimming pool, a golf course, and the immense Victorian barracks buildings, then used as federal offices. 

My family lived in several places over the years there, but we stayed the longest at 157-A Taylor Ave., built in 1905, one of the handsome yellow-brick homes on Officers’ Row. 

The Row is among 28 remaining buildings that were constructed between the Civil War and World War I on 141 acres of land that belongs to everyone in the state — and, in a way, to no one.

The state owns it; the DNR administers it; it lies within the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area, and it’s an unincorporated part of Hennepin County.

“It’s a little goofy governmental black hole,’’ Chuck Liddy, an architect with Miller Dunwiddie Architecture, who has studied the Upper Post for a decade, said in a phone interview in early August.

Without maintenance, the buildings moldered. By 2006, conditions had gotten so bad that the National Trust for Historic Preservation put the Upper Post on its “Eleven Most Endangered’’ list. By then it had already been on Minnesota’s “most endangered’’ list three times. 

Liddy traces the neglect to the way the Upper Post came into state hands. When the VA left, he said, the area’s title was transferred to the state under a federal program called “Lands to Parks.’’ 

The deed specified that the Upper Post could be used only for recreational purposes, like the baseball fields that the Minneapolis parks department built on the old polo grounds under a lease from the DNR.  

Now, negotiations are under way to change the terms of the deed and give the Upper Post “Lands to Monuments’’ status, Liddy said. That will allow the historic buildings to finally be restored.

July 1973: The last day in the house at 157-A Taylor Ave.
Photo courtesy of Catherine Watson
July 1973: The last day in the house at 157-A Taylor Ave.

“We’re open to any kind of use out there, as long as it’s compatible,’’ said Larry Peterson, of the DNR’s division of parks and recreation.    
For the past two years, Hennepin County has been working with the DNR, using state and county grants, to stabilize and mothball the buildings so they can survive until developers are finally allowed in.

The work — replacing or patching roofs, enclosing what is left of original porches, re-boarding the windows — has been done by county inmates through the Sentencing to Service program. The effort is win-win: The offenders learn new skills for their future lives, and the fort buildings get prepared for future reuse. 

Complications ahead
It has taken a decade to get this far — the DNR’S first complete study of the Upper Post was done in 1998 — and the way forward is still land-mined with complications.

Nearly a dozen government entities claim pieces of original fort land that lie outside the DNR’s acreage. It may take years to clear title to them all — may even take an act of Congress, as McLaughlin suggested at the news conference last summer, when he and the others announced a commission to tackle the problem.  

If it succeeds, what happens next will depend on “market forces,’’ said Royce Yeater, director of the National Trust for Historic Preservation’s Midwest office, based in Chicago. That means outside developers — private money — could come in, lease the property and begin what preservationists call “adaptive re-use.’’

It won’t be cheap. Liddy estimates basic rehab costs at $80 million, “just to make them useful,’’ and the tab could be much higher.  

Any new construction and changes to the old would have to follow newly written historic-preservation guidelines, he and others said. The guidelines outline appropriate architectural styles, the allowable location and density of new development, the right kinds of plants and trees, and appropriate uses. 

The north half of the fort’s golf course, for example, “gets restored as a parade ground,’’ Liddy said — because that’s what it was in 1939, the Upper Post’s military heyday. 

After the July 28 news conference, the DNR unlocked a few of the buildings, including our old house on Taylor, and I got to tiptoe in with some of the other attendees, following flashlight beams through the dark, boarded-up interiors.

Paint had peeled everywhere, plaster had crumbled from ceilings, vandals had pulled the front banister out of our house; in another the leaky roof had led to water damage so severe that the kitchen floor had collapsed into the cellar.

But structurally, they were sound. The thick brick walls are solid, and the houses are salvageable. I’ve seen buildings far worse off that turned into rehabbed swans.

I’ve always hoped the same thing would happen here — but it’s not because I lived there or because I’d love to live there again.

You can’t keep old buildings standing just because a handful of people are nostalgic about their childhoods — unless maybe they include a U.S. president or two, which Tower Town never did.

A better reason is so the past can be of use in the present — as housing or offices or schools — something that’s been done successfully at other demilitarized forts around the country, including Fort Sheridan in Illinois, Diamond Cove in Maine and Vancouver Barracks in Washington state.
No, the real reason I want the Upper Post to keep standing is so that far into the future, buildings like Officers’ Row and the Long Barracks and the Headquarters can do for other kids what they did for my friends and me:

Make them see that history is real — and that it matters. Because history isn’t old buildings. It’s people. It’s us. History is what we leave behind. We write it with every breath.

Old buildings are our memorials, our milestones along the way. They remind us of where we’ve been and how we got here, like giant family scrapbooks made of brick and wood. Saving them means saving part of ourselves. I think that’s important — and I learned it at the Upper Post.

Catherine Watson is an award-winning writer, photographer and teacher.

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (4)

  1. Submitted by Steve Borsch on 11/28/2008 - 10:09 am.


    On every trip to Europe, I’m always deeply appreciative of the care taken to preserve, protect and cherish the physical structures that preserve their history.

    Historical structures also give depth-n-texture to otherwise functional structures in most modern towns and cities. Just being in buildings that go back generations gives a unique perspective to all of our lives.

    Thought you’d enjoy some photos I took in the summer of 2005 at the Upper Post. Though it shows the decay and crumbling structures (and may make you wistful and sad…sorry about that) it gave me an on-the-ground appreciation of what could be if we restore this area before it’s at the point of no return.

    URL: http://steveborsch.com/FS_2005/

  2. Submitted by Todd Hintz on 11/28/2008 - 08:33 pm.

    Preserving buildings is something we can all benefit from as a society. They serve as a touchstone for people to learn why we’re here, how Minnesota came to be what it is today. We didn’t sprout full grown out of the prairie six months ago and the fort is one way to teach our children about their past.

    It’s going to take a little luck and a lot of hard work to preserve the Upper Post, but I’m confident that we can get it done. If anyone reading this wants more information or would like to pitch in and help, drop by UpperPost.org and look around or drop me a note.

  3. Submitted by Paul Linnee on 11/30/2008 - 12:54 pm.

    Two connecting angles here….

    #1. I served 20 years in the Army Reserve, and for about half that time, my unit was housed in Building 103 on the Upper Post, at the far end of Taylor Avenue, right next to the fence off the airport runway. During that time I had losts of time to explore the depths of Bldg. 103, well into its bowels, and it was fascinating. I have also been troubled by the disrepair into which the buildings have fallen.

    #2. I also worked for the Richfield Public Safety Department (by the way, I seem to recall that children living at the Upper Post actually resided in the Richfield school district and attended Richfield schools — is that right Ms. Watson??) and I recall a movemebr in the late 1970’s under which the MN/DNR was seeking proposals from nearby fire departments for a contract to provide fire protection to the Upper Post, all as a part of a development plan, which obviously went nowhere.

    Finally, I seem to recall a tragic fire of an historical icon out in that area 20 – 30 years ago to which there was a very delayed response from (of all things) the St. Paul F.D. Who now is responsible for fire protection on the Upper Post?

  4. Submitted by Fred Stanley on 09/15/2013 - 07:50 am.

    Fort Snelling Upper Post

    I also lived on the Upper Post during the same period as yourself. (from my birth in 1950 until
    early 1969) I didn’t know you as you seem to be somewhat older, but I did know your brother
    Steven (also older) and your sister Liz, with whom I went to Richfield High School. My family lived first in Bldg. 63 over by the fire station, moving over near you to Bldg. 151 in 1957. It was a wonderful place to have a childhood-almost utopian from a child’s point of view. However it gradually changed, first with the building of the freeways, and then the airport with it’s subsequent expansions. I’ve always felt sad that I have no childhood home to return to and I cannot decide how I feel about the remaining buildings; there are too many ghosts for me to accept anything else.

Leave a Reply