Solar storms pose increasing threat to modern world

coronal mass ejection
An image taken from the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory Extreme Ultraviolet Imaging Telescope that shows a widely spreading coronal mass ejection as it blasts more than a billion tons of matter out into space at millions of kilometers per hour.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Whether it is a red “rayed arc,” a green “omega band or a pulsating “final phase” aurora, the Northern Lights that occasionally dance across Minnesota’s night skies are always breathtaking. And as the Sun begins its ascension toward the next “solar maximum,” expected to arrive between 2010 and 2012, there will be more storms and, as a result, more aurora high in the atmosphere.

But the charged particles from the Sun can do more than create pretty lights when they interact with the Earth’s magnetic fields, and “space weather” scientists fear an extreme solar storm could do enormous damage to our technology.

For the scientists gathered recently for the 2009 Space Weather Enterprise Forum in Washington, D.C., the talk of the Earth being hit by catastrophic solar storms — both past and predicted — was almost casual, the currency of the work they do.

There was the legendary “Carrington Event,” a series of magnetic storms from the sun that hit the Earth in August and September of 1859, disrupting telegraph lines across the United States and triggering aurora so bright they turned the night skies into day as far south as the Caribbean. The storm went on for days.

They spoke of a solar storm in May of 1921 that stunned scientists with its power and one in March of 1989 that blacked out the entire power grid in Quebec, Canada, in just 92 seconds. In 2003, the “Halloween storm” caused a massive blackout in the Northeast United States and $10 billion worth of damage to electrical systems.

There are lessons to be learned from these past events, the researchers emphasized, and the danger posed by solar storms is increasing. This growing threat comes not from changes in the Sun, but from the increasing dependence of human societies on technology and electricity. A storm on the scale of the Carrington Event could damage the U.S. electrical grid to such an extent that vast regions of the country could be without power for weeks, perhaps months. Without electricity, drinkable water would soon be in short supply, as would fuel, food, communications and just about everything else society depends on to function. 

Lives at risk
“The consequences would be almost incalculable,” said Daniel Baker, director of the University of Colorado’s laboratory for atmospheric and space physics. An extreme solar storm hitting our modern, high-tech world would severely disrupt oil and gas supplies, emergency and government services, the banking and finance industry, and transportation. The cost of the damage could reach into the trillions of dollars, he said.

New electrical systems are designed to be efficient, which is different from being robust and hardened against the effects of a solar storm. “There is an efficiency-vulnerability tradeoff,” said George Mason University social scientist Todd LaPorte, who studies critical infrastructures. “Sometimes efficiency isn’t your friend.

“Large storms can literally place millions of lives at risk,” he said, and our growing dependence on technology is increasing that risk. “We should be preparing for a storm four to 10 times the intensity of the 1989 event [that blacked out Quebec]. There is a false sense of security.”

The reason the danger posed by space weather is not drawing more concern from the federal government, electric utilities or the public was summed up by David Crain of the space systems division of ITT, an engineering and technology company.

“The problem with space weather is nobody directly dies of space weather, and that is a detriment in getting funding and increasing public education,” he said.

Unlike hurricanes or floods, the damage caused by solar storms is to underlying systems and not obvious in terms of visible devastation.

Heeding warnings
Preparing for extreme solar storms also involves spending millions, even billions, of dollars, and it is difficult to get the government to spend significant money to prepare for an event that is merely predicted, the speakers agreed.

“We have a hard time thinking about anticipation,” said LaPorte. “We tend to react to events, not anticipate them. We’re not good at heeding warnings.”

“We have developed a new awareness of the extremes of severe geomagnetic storms,” said John Kappenman, founder of Storm Analysis Consultants and an expert on the vulnerability of the power grid to solar storms.

Proposed designs for the grid may actually escalate the risk, he said. “There is an unrecognized, system-wide risk to the grid [from solar storms],” he said. “There is no design code to minimize this threat.”

The scientists were assured by officials from the Obama administration’s Office of Science and Technology Policy that the threats of space weather are a concern. But because solar storms do not result in immediate, visible damage, the participants at the forum said public education is critical to developing and implementing a plan to mitigate the damage from a future extreme solar storm.

“But if you do too much of that, what you end up with in the public is disaster fatigue,” Crain said.

This story is provided by the Inside Science News Service, which is supported by the American Institute of Physics, a not-for-profit publisher of scientific journals. Jim Dawson is a news editor at Inside Science News Service and can be reached at

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (1)

  1. Submitted by Glenn Mesaros on 05/28/2009 - 03:10 pm.

    Good Bye Global Warming.

    Long-term studies of the historical record have shown that when the minima in sunspot activity extend beyond the average 11 years, significant declines in temperatures on Earth are experienced. Regular records of sunspot activity go back to the 17th century.

    The current solar cycle, numbered 23, began in 1996, and was expected to reach minimum and transition to solar cycle 24 in January 2007.

    It did not. Instead, a prolonged period of excessively low solar activity has continued through this moment. In the year 2008 there were no sunspots observed on 266 of the year’s 366 days (73%). “To find a year with more blank suns, you have to go all the way back to 1913,” NASA reported in a press release on the subject. Since the beginning of the current year, sunspot counts have dropped even lower. As of April 9, there were no sunspots on 89 of the year’s 99 days (90%).

    Hello Global Cooling.

    French President Nicolas Sarkozy’s appears ready to appoint renowned geophysicist and former socialist party leader Dr. Claude Allegre – France’s most outspoken global warming skeptic — as the new super-ministry of industry and innovation.

    If Allegre, who has mocked former Vice President Al Gore’s Nobel Prize as “a political gimmick,” is chosen for the appointment, it would send political earthquakes through Europe and the rest of the world. Allegre is a former believer in man-made global warming who reversed his views in recent years to become one of the most vocal dissenters of man-made global warming fears. Climate Depot first reported on Allegre’s possible appointment to a government post on April 16, 2009.

    Allegre, a former French Socialist Party leader and a member of both the French and U.S. Academies of Science, was one of the first scientists to sound global warming fears 20 years ago, but he now says the cause of climate change is “unknown.” Allegre has authored more than 100 scientific articles, written 11 books, and received numerous scientific awards including the Goldschmidt Medal from the Geochemical Society of the United States.

    Allegre’s possible appointment has ‘drawn strong protests’ from environmentalists, the Financial Times reported on May 27, 2009.

    “Putting him in charge of scientific research would be tantamount to ‘giving the finger to scientists’, said Nicolas Hulot, France’s best-known environmental activist,” told the Financial Times.

Leave a Reply