The big question for economic recovery: Which stresses are merely cyclical and which indicate a cold, new reality?

Recession in Minnesota: Part 1 of three articles

Biomass, in the form of corn refuse (foreground), and wind turbines are providing jobs as well as energy in Morris.

MinnPost photo by Sharon Schmickle
Biomass, in the form of corn refuse (foreground), and wind turbines are providing jobs as well as energy in Morris.
Recession in Minnesota

By kicking a massive budget imbalance two years into the future, Minnesota is betting big time on recovery from this recession — hoping that a rebound will save the state from fiscal disaster. But odds are high that some trends troubling the state are not merely cyclical.

To shed light on the odds, MinnPost will examine Minnesota’s economy over the rest of this year, assessing damage region by region and looking ahead to prospects for recovery. We begin with this overview and this question: Is the recession changing Minnesota’s economy?

Actually, that’s a trick question. The best answer would be another question: Which Minnesota economy?

Minnesota has at least six distinct regions, which the recession has battered at different times and in different ways.

Twin Cities’ financial flu
The more a region’s economy resembles that of the Twin Cities, the earlier and harder it was hit, said Kyle Uphoff, who manages regional analysis for the state Department of Employment and Economic Development.

St. Cloud, for example, took a swift, sharp wallop. Construction there had boomed in recent years along with population.

Kyle Uphoff

DEED
Kyle Uphoff

On the other side of the picture, the housing bubble that set off this recession missed much of the state outside major metro areas. Logically, so did the bubble’s burst.

“If you move beyond the central region — say to northwestern and southwestern Minnesota — those two parts of the state didn’t exhibit high growth before the recession and they have not exhibited heavy losses either,” Uphoff said.

You can see the stark differences in this map of 2008 foreclosure rates prepared by the nonprofit HousingLink. Counties with the highest rates are clustered in and near the Twin Cities.

2008MNForeclosureRates700.jpg

Click on chart to enlarge

With a few exceptions in chronically poor counties, the same pattern ran through mortgage delinquency rates mapped by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Two to 5 percent of the households in counties in and around the Twin Cities were more than 90 days behind in their mortgage payments at the end of 2008, while property owners elsewhere in Minnesota were more current — especially in the state’s southern and western reaches.

By another measure, the distressed financial sector also was concentrated in the Twin Cities, where about 8 percent of the jobs were in financial activities compared with 6.7 percent for the state as a whole (including the Twin Cities, which means the concentration was even lower in Greater Minnesota).

No free pass
This is not to say the other regions got a free pass from the financial crisis. As credit dried up for mortgages, so did new construction everywhere. Jobs for carpenters, plumbers, electricians and many others were swept away in the fallout, said David Nelson of the University of Minnesota Extension Service in Mankato.

“I went to a trap range near Le Center to shoot sporting clays with a shotgun, and I was surprised to see a plumber I know running the trap,” Nelson said.

“How you doing?” Nelson asked.

“Pretty good.”

“How long you been working here?”

“Three weeks.”

“What brings you here?”

“Got laid off.”

It’s the litany of hard times. And right now, it’s repeated throughout Minnesota. The critical — yet unanswered — question for Minnesota is how many of the layoffs are permanent.

“I know some contractors have unhung their shingles,” Nelson said. “They were sole proprietors, and they have closed their doors.”

And paychecks related to construction, especially new home construction, will not return to the pre-recession levels anytime soon, said experts in every region. Whether they built houses in Worthington, Waseca or Wadena, some of those workers will need to find new skills or new uses for old skills.

The impact of that cold reality goes beyond the workers who wielded the hammers and hung the drywall. A myriad of small businesses throughout the state supplied construction contractors. Up north, they cut the timber that went into the boards that went into the houses. Further south, they delivered everything from cement for basements to asphalt for roofs.

Now, a good share of the state’s uncertainty hinges on thousands of those workers who are looking for new ways to earn a paycheck.

Points of vulnerability
Manufacturing held its own initially, but eventually it too slowed down almost everywhere in the state, said Tobias Madden, a regional economist for the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.

Window makers and everyone else supplying building construction were especially hard hit. So were makers of big-ticket toys like boats and snowmobiles.

In this sense, some pockets of Greater Minnesota are suffering even more than the Twin Cities.

Tobias Madden

Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
Tobias Madden

“It is typical to have one or two industries in a town,” Madden said. “So generalities about overall manufacturing don’t show town-by-town what is happening.”

(In the next installment of this series, see MinnPost’s report on one Minnesota town that is fighting to survive the loss of its largest employer.)

A wave of auto-industry fallout
Also vulnerable are the thousands of Minnesota workers who depend on the American auto industry — from taconite miners on the Iron Range to mechanics at small-town car dealerships.

The loss of dealerships is not going to be a ripple here and there, but “a wave riding through our economy,” predicted Kurt Thompson, a loan officer for the Southwest Initiative Foundation. The 25 or more jobs a dealer typically creates can make or break a small town’s fortunes.

And the state has yet to reckon with the proportions of the loss.

“We just don’t know yet,” Thompson said. “We don’t have enough information.”

Taconite’s double whammy
Meanwhile, taconite mines suffered a double whammy as the car makers’ slump came on top of cutbacks in steel orders from China, India and other places. Abrupt shutdowns on the Iron Range have sent unemployment numbers soaring into the double digits.

Even within regions, the vulnerabilities differ county by county, often depending on demographics.

Along lakeshores near Brainerd, for example, employment numbers don’t accurately reflect changes in household incomes because so many retirees live there.

One critical question for the state’s fiscal future is whether those retirees, so vital to the economies of towns like Brainerd and Bemidji, will be forced to cut spending too, whether their 401(k) accounts effectively will be “201(k)s” for some time to come.

Farmers hold a wild card
The last recession that cut this deep came in the 1980s. It permanently changed Minnesota’s economy because farm land values collapsed driving many families off their farms. Small towns withered as former farmers took jobs in regional centers like Willmar and Mankato and shopped there too.

This recession is completely different.

“We don’t have any evidence to tell a story of a collapse of rural real estate this time,” said Steven Taff, an extension economist at the University of Minnesota whose specialties include agricultural policy and local public finance.

Thanks to record high corn prices, crop farmers surged forward last year while the rest of the state hit the ditch. Livestock farmers struggled more because they had to pay the same high prices to feed their cows and pigs. And now, low milk prices are knocking some dairy farmers out of business.

But the farmers’ overall plight is nothing like the farm crisis of the 1980s.

What’s good for farmers is good for their regions and for the state because they generally spread their earnings to local banks, stores and implement dealers.

Many small towns have retooled
Meanwhile, many small towns have stabilized. While their main streets are depleted, they are cashing in on village-scale charm and transforming their neighborhoods into bedroom communities for people who work in regional centers.

“People are not leaving in droves,” said Ryan Pesch who serves 11 west central counties for the University of Minnesota Extension Service. “A lot of small towns have been retooling for a number of years to make themselves more attractive as places to live.”

Agriculture no longer drives Minnesota’s economy and it hasn’t for decades. But as a sector, it is at least as important as housing and manufacturing.

“If you look at all of the things farmers buy and all of the people with jobs related to their yields, you see that a lot of folks in this state make a living and keep shoes on the kids by growing, shipping and processing food,” Taff said.

Now, with new crops rising in Minnesota’s fields, agriculture is a wild card in the state’s recovery. And economists have no sure way to predict how the card will be played. From food choices in China to storms riding the jet stream, the fate of these crops is subject to a myriad of variables that are shaped by events outside Minnesota’s borders.

Looking ahead
While the powers that be at the State Capital clearly hope that a rebounding economy will save the state from fiscal disaster a couple of years hence, this is nowhere near a safe bet, say experts who have watched the global economic downturn force lingering, if not permanent, damage on some sectors of Minnesota’s economy.

“Gov. Pawlenty and the Legislature have this belief that what goes around comes around, so you hunker down, you make an adjustment, shift here, take one-time money there and by the time we get to 2012, the economy will be humming again,” said Jack Geller, former president of the Center for Rural Policy and Development in St. Peter and now at the University of Minnesota Crookston.

Jack Geller

U of M Crookston
Jack Geller

But odds are high that some trends troubling the state are not merely cyclical.

“What happens if what goes around doesn’t come back around?” Geller asked. “I hope they are right, but I don’t believe it. There may, in effect, be a new reality out there. A lot of things in the Minnesota economy have fundamentally changed.”

Many Minnesota companies will rebound with the national economy, and some jobs related to housing will come back because that market has sunk so low, predicted Madden at the Minneapolis Federal Reserve. Still, the recession-driven job churn will force legions of workers to switch careers. Wrenching though that may be for individuals, Madden points out that change is an economic constant.

“In a vibrant economy, there are always industries and companies that are destroyed and replaced,” Madden said. “Our economy pretty much lets the winners win and the losers lose.”

Exhibit A is Minnesota’s medical-device industry. It provides some of the state’s best jobs today, jobs that didn’t exist a generation ago.

The trick now is sorting through temporary recession-related change to identify the long-term impacts and follow the jobs accordingly.

“We always see permanent shifts happening, but it’s hard to say which ones are happening now,” Madden said.

One promising horizon is in renewable energy and related green jobs, said Uphoff at DEED. (See MinnPost’s audio/slide-show report below on new green jobs in Morris and Starbuck.)

The state has yet to put firm numbers, though, on how many permanent jobs will come as more companies capture the wind, gasify biomass and deploy other new technologies to create and save energy.

Some of Minnesota’s wind turbine manufacturers laid off workers this summer as their customers adjusted to tight financing and other recession-related problems. But new projects keep springing up statewide.

“There are a lot of groups looking at this from different angles,” Uphoff said. Very broadly, the biggest hope for Greater Minnesota is to look at its strengths and build on them.”

Next: MinnPost takes a road trip through Greater Minnesota’s economy.

Sharon Schmickle writes about science, national and foreign affairs, Greater Minnesota and other subjects. She can be reached at sschmickle [at] minnpost [dot] com.

Comments (7)

  1. Submitted by Glenn Mesaros on 07/07/2009 - 08:38 am.

    As for the unemployment, there are fewer jobs in the U.S. economy now than there were nine years ago; 3 million jobs have been lost, net, while Obama has been President. The number of official unemployed, 14.7 million, is the highest in U.S. history, with another 9 million forced to work part-time and 6 million too discouraged to look for work. The average length of time without a job for the 14.7 million officially unemployed, 24.5 weeks, is the highest ever. The official unemployment rate among adult men is 10%, and real male unemployment is 18%.

    But Obama, his “stimulus” already a whopping failure, refused to say anything about infrastructure public works or Federal/state creation of jobs now; to him, unemployment is just a “long-term” problem.

    That Obama’s cap and trade policy, to monetize carbon dioxide, is the “next big bubble,” is documented by journalist Matt Taibbi in Rolling Stone.

    Numerous states are shutting down from California to North Carolina. By October, there will not be much left of the United States of America.

  2. Submitted by dan buechler on 07/07/2009 - 10:39 am.

    Good start I was missing Steve Perry’s blog.

  3. Submitted by Richard Schulze on 07/07/2009 - 11:24 am.

    What matters most for economic growth is the change in the stimulus payout, and the biggest increases in the stimulus payout are occurring right now. The payout was near $10 billion in the first quarter; it is expected to rise to $80 billion in the current quarter, remain effectively unchanged through this time next year, and then fade quickly after that. The impact on the economy is not immediate, as measured by real GDP, employment and unemployment. The extra take-home pay that workers saw after payroll taxes fell, for example, won’t be spent for several months. If the 2001 and 2008 rebate checks are a guide, it will take through the end of this year for workers to spend about two-thirds of their extra cash.

    It is important to note that estimating the economic impacts of the fiscal stimulus is not an accounting exercise but rather an econometric one. It is not feasible to identify and count each job that results from the stimulus; economic impacts are estimated using a macro econometric model, a statistical representation of the U.S. economy based on historical relationships. The economic impact of the stimulus is determined by simulating such a model with fiscal stimulus and then without it. The results presented here are based on the Moody’s Economy.com model, which is used regularly for forecasting, scenario building and policy analysis. The Obama administration has derived its estimates of the stimulus’ impact using a similar approach.

    To date, most of the benefits from the stimulus plan have gone to state and local governments to pay for Medicaid and educational programs and expanded unemployment insurance benefits. This stimulus is defensive—it helps forestall draconian cuts in government services or tax increases that would have otherwise occurred. In the nomenclature of the debate surrounding the merits of the stimulus, this preserves jobs. A bigger economic kick from stimulus should be seen this summer, when the stimulus goes on the offensive and begins to create jobs, via personal tax cuts and infrastructure spending.

    A good gauge of whether the stimulus is working as expected will be whether infrastructure outlays increase significantly over the next several months. If they don’t, the benefits will likely be delayed until next spring as winter will forestall many projects. There is also a growing concern that state and local government officials may push projects into next year so they ramp up just as political campaigning starts for the 2010 election. Better home sales will also be a positive signal.

    Policymakers should thus be quietly preparing another round of fiscal stimulus for early 2010. Effective additional stimulus might include more help to state and local governments, whose budget problems will probably be even worse next year; an expanded housing tax credit to address the foreclosure crisis; and a payroll tax holiday. Delaying increases in marginal personal tax rates, now legislated to occur at the start of 2011, would likely also make sense. Higher-income households may begin to rein in spending in 2010 as they prepare for the higher tax rates.

    It is premature for policymakers to publicly consider all this now; the current stimulus should be given a chance, and the nation’s long-term fiscal challenges are daunting. But if the Great Recession has taught us anything, it is to prepare for the worst.

  4. Submitted by Glenn Mesaros on 07/07/2009 - 03:23 pm.

    So, what is needed is a global system of cooperation, among credit systems, in which we recognize what the world needs, in terms of physical levels of production, physical improvements in conditions of life. It must be sovereign, it must be done by sovereign nation-states. But there must be also a system of international credit-sharing, in support of long-term projects, and we’re talking about essentially a 50-year perspective. Which means, you have to design, which can be done very quickly, a 50-year agreement on a credit organization among nation-states, in which we can integrate the aims and objectives of recovery of these nations.

    Now, that would mean putting the system through bankruptcy. This would mean that most of the debt, which is currently outstanding, is financial speculative debt. Nations are being bled to death, by a system of speculative debt. Under bankruptcy reorganization, according to U.S. law, most of this debt that is found to be worthless, will be simply cancelled. And the amount of debt will be restricted to a stable banking system, under credit system rules. It’s the only possible way. As long as we try to demand, that the world economy be collapsed in order to pay a cancerously growing debt, there is no chance of recovery. Under the present rules, of the present system, and under the rules of globalization, there’s no chance for the survival of civilization in any part of this planet, today! So we will have to do this, make this reform, because there’s no other chance: Unless you want to collapse the civilization and want to go from 6.7 billion people on this planet, to less than 2 fairly quickly, you’re going to do that kind of reform. And that’s what I’ve been presenting and that’s what I’ve been arguing for. I know time is on my side. But time is also against us: Because, if this process continues, the rate of death in this planet, from diseases and other effects, is going to wipe out a lot of the world’s population. Whole nations will simply disappear from the map.

    http://www.larouchepac.com/node/10895

  5. Submitted by Thomas Swift on 07/07/2009 - 03:50 pm.

    For anyone interested in the graphs that accompany the article that Richard Schulze cut and pasted, I suggest reading the original at:

    http://www.economy.com/dismal/article_free.asp?cid=116000&src=msnbc

    *rolls eyes*

  6. Submitted by Richard Schulze on 07/07/2009 - 06:08 pm.

    Thomas, Second paragraph, third sentence.
    Which clearly states where that article originated and additional information could be found.

    If there was to have been some sort of “Tom Foolery” that sentence would have been omitted.

    It was interesting that you did not pick up on The #1 post which originates from a Larouche website.

    Nevertheless, the Zandi article was a nice counter point to Glenn’s article.

    Your comments sounds nothing less than selective criticism Thomas.

  7. Submitted by david granneman on 07/07/2009 - 08:07 pm.

    WHEN WILL THE RECOVERY START ?
    lets take a look at the business climate in the united states. let’s pretend you are an investor looking to start or expand a large or small business. you see president obama is going drastically raise corporate business taxes. he is also going to raise income taxes on people earning more than $250,000. this would include many small business owners. as an investor you see that at any time president obama can disregard business and bankruptcy laws and take over your company. he then can confiscate your investment and give it to people with little or no investment in the company – leaving you with little or nothing. as a company ceo you see that president obama can fire you and then put a cap on the salaries of the remaining executives and workers. you see that president obama can tell you what products you market and sell. you see coming punishing environmental rules and regulations. you then realise the worst is yet to come. the highest user of energy is business and manufacturing. the purpose of cap and trade is to rapidly increase the cost of energy. rapidly rising energy costs will began to put american business at a greater and greater disadvantage to countries with cheap and abundant energy. you see president obama is planning to require more and more of our energy to be wind or solar. these sources of energy are very expensive and unreliable. this will mean we will need to depend more and more on foreign sources of energy. president obama is stopping the developemnet of our own natural resorces.
    now lets look at our competition – china.
    china is slashing corporate business taxes. china is giving lipservice to climate change but not taking any actions to limit greenhouse gases. china is building a new coal fired power plants every two weeks. china is inversting heavily in developing their own natural resources. in addition they are working with cuba to develope oil fields in our own gulf of mexico. china is also working with argentina to develope their newly discoverd offshore oil fields. china has contracted to buy oil from iraq. china is working to ensure they have a cheap and abundant supply of oil to allow them to grow and prosper.
    AS AN INVERSTOR WHERE WOULD YOU BUILD A NEW FACTORY AND HIRE NEW EMPLOYEES – WHICH COUNTRY DO YOU THINK WILL HAVE A RECOVERY.

Leave a Reply