Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood greeted with two kinds of ‘Minnesota chill’

U.S. Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood didn’t exactly step into a warm environment when he arrived in Minnesota today.

First off, of course, was the nasty weather, which caused LaHood to arrive about 30 minutes late at the Economic Club of Minnesota meeting, where he was the guest speaker,

“Sorry we’re late, we had a little transportation problem called the weather,” LaHood told the audience of 200, which included a lot of people in suits representing large law firms, banks, construction firms and a large dose of local politicians.

There was a little laughter.

Mostly, though, LaHood’s speech was greeted with a Minnesota chill. And during a question-and-answer session following the speech, there were at least a couple of questions that bordered on hostile regarding the Obama administration’s efforts to stimulate the economy.

LaHood, a Republican and a former Illinois congressman, seemed untroubled by the tone of the questions. Instead, he told program hosts that he would be more than happy to keep answering questions.

Right off, LaHood supported one of the administration’s programs that Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty has belittled the most, the “cash for clunkers” program.

Sec. Ray LaHood
Sec. Ray LaHood

Calling the $3 billion program “a bright spot,” he said that the effort had put “$72 million into the pockets of 400 Minnesota auto dealers.

“A win, win, win,” he said of the program. “It drove up sales, it was a lifeline to the automotive industry, all dealers have been paid and it took gas guzzlers off the road.”

There was no applause.

Nor was there applause when the secretary said that passing a health care reform package was the No. 1 priority in creating an economic recovery.

“We have the best health care system in the world,” LaHood said, “but the problem is, all don’t have access to that care. … The stars are aligned. Health care reform is coming to America.”

Silence.

He tied health care to transportation (a rebuilding and rethinking of the transportation system), and a “transformed energy policy” as the building blocks to brighter days.

Most in the audience seemed to sigh.

The biggest applause went to a man in the audience, who angrily suggested that economic recovery would come quicker if the Obama administration would “free the private sector from regulations” and if the administration would stop taxing the wealthiest.

“Your salary is being paid with borrowed money,” the man said, angrily.

The angry fellow received enthusiastic applause.

But LaHood was not shy about responding sharply.

“A tax cut won’t solve our problems,” the secretary said. “One of the things he [Obama] campaigned on was infrastructure. Every time you see an orange cone along the highway, that means somebody’s working. That means our infrastructure, which was ignored for 10 years, is being rebuilt. It [the federal stimulus money] is working.”

Another member of the audience, a woman, who clearly was a devotee of the previous administration, asked when the Obama administration was going to stop blaming President Bush for the country’s problems.  LaHood didn’t flinch.

“There’s no more transformation man than President Obama,” he said. “He’s looking forward.”

Not everyone in this club that bills itself as nonpartisan was so cool to LaHood or the administration.

For example, Mary Hamann-Roland, the mayor of Apple Valley, sang the praises of the administration regarding the Cedar Corridor project. The effort will link Lakeville to the Mall of America via express buses, which will then connect with the light rail system.

The mayor invited LaHood to come back to Minnesota when the project is completed in 2011.

“We’ll try to get the president to come if I’m too busy,” said LaHood to much laughter.

He also got a warm response when he said that the Transportation Department will work with Congress to prohibit texting while driving.

And finally, the audience approved when LaHood urged all to block out the “noise” and “trash talk” generated by 24-7 media coverage and talk radio.

“Let’s be positive, optimistic,” he said. “That’s what Americans want.”

There was applause for that line.

Then he headed to St. Paul to tour the Union Depot with 4th District Rep. Betty McCollum. Already $15 million of federal money has been poured into designing and planning to turn the historic building into a modern facility where high speed trains, light rail, Amtrak and buses all will connect.

Such an idea, the secretary said during his speech, no longer is just a pipe dream. Rather, he said, the plans surrounding the Depot represent “the new outlook on transportation.”

The audience had not seemed convinced.

Comments (8)

  1. Submitted by dan buechler on 10/15/2009 - 03:44 pm.

    Really interesting article especially in view of the what should have been/could have been bipartisan tone considering LaHoods background affiliations. Driving Home today there was an interesting science speaker who talked about the time he took 5 minutes to answer a complex question and some members in the general audience started heckling him saying get to the point. Well the point is most things in nature/science/life can’t be reduced down to a concise soundbite and be damned if you elaborate. Not to be a nitpicker here but you seemed to have written about applause twice on the same angry man. But anyways keep writing, keep running go Doug go!

  2. Submitted by Ron Gotzman on 10/15/2009 - 04:29 pm.

    Don’t you hate it when those hostile and uneducated “tea-baggers” infiltrate the Economic Club of Minnesota!

  3. Submitted by Michael Hunt on 10/15/2009 - 04:32 pm.

    “this club that bills itself as nonpartisan”. Seriously??? Then I guess this summer’s Republican covention was also nonpartisan.

  4. Submitted by Dave Thul on 10/15/2009 - 06:27 pm.

    ‘Nor was there applause when the secretary said that passing a health care reform package was the No. 1 priority in creating an economic recovery.’

    Even if you believe the President’s claims about what healthcare reform will achieve, how can it be a priority in creating an economic recovery when it wont take effect for 3 more years (if it passes).

    Or is that an admission that the economy isn’t expected to recover until 2013?

  5. Submitted by marley johannson on 10/15/2009 - 09:06 pm.

    Where were these idiots when we wasted $1.4 trillion on the Iraq war and 4,200 lives. They are a joke. But since they cannot read, I doubt they will see these comments

  6. Submitted by Thomas Swift on 10/15/2009 - 09:47 pm.

    Well said, Dave.

  7. Submitted by John Roach on 10/15/2009 - 11:43 pm.

    The agenda and target membership of the “Economic Club of Minnesota” is made quite evident by the public statements they make on their website.

    From the sponsorship of the Center for the American Experiment to their puffery about the wonderfulness of unrestricted free trade, their complaining about the horrible burden of taxes, and their dog whistle phrasing about the travails of public education, it’s pretty evident that this particular club is for right wingers only.

    It is no surprise that a message of optimism and the advantages of working together would receive a hostile reception with this crowd—at least until the GOP has regained power, anyway.

  8. Submitted by Hénock Gugsa on 10/16/2009 - 02:10 am.

    “What up”, GOP? I thought you were the party of ideas and optimism? Where has all the gloom and doom come from?

    Well, not to worry. When you’re back in power, we’ll once again reclaim the high ground of extraordinary infallibility in all things.

    But still, I think you like hearing me say, “What up?!” Dontcha?

Leave a Reply