Hold off on that celebration! Budget forecast shows improvement but pace of recovery still unclear

There’s no need to start dancing in the street or bursting into a chorus of “Happy Days Are Here Again.”

On the other hand, the state’s economy isn’t tanking anymore; in fact, it’s showing a slight bit of improvement.

Based on the economic forecast (PDF) delivered today by the Minnesota Department of Management and Budget, what should the headline be?

“State Budget Outlook Improves,” said Tom Stinson, the state’s economist.

The numbers: In the current biennium, the $1.2 billion deficit forecast last fall has now shrunk a bit to $994 million.

Tom Stinson
MinnPost photo by Craig Lassig
Tom Stinson

That’s still a huge number, but Stinson, not known for wild-eyed optimism, said the good news is that any improvement is an encouraging positive sign, compared with the grim realities of last summer, when all sorts of numbers were written in red ink.

“The real issue is how fast the recovery will proceed,” Stinson said, adding quickly that there are both local and international issues that still could turn charts of the improving economy from a shallow U shape, to a W, complete with another bad dip.

Still, Stinson said that Global Insight, the outfit that supplies Minnesota with many of its big-picture economic numbers, says there’s a better chance (25 percent) that there will be a faster-than-expected turnaround than a chance (15 percent) that there will be another decline.

The slightly improved forecast still creates daunting budget problems for the governor and the Legislature as they grapple with getting the current budget in balance. And the following biennium deficit, 2012-13, is still a mind-numbing $5.789 billion, not counting inflation.

Tom Hanson, finance department commissioner, suggested that the number is not as overwhelming as it looks IF the legislature makes permanent the one-time unallotments that Gov. Tim Pawlenty made last spring. That’s an unlikely scenario, though, for that would mean the elimination of such programs as the General Medical Assistance Care program and also mean doing some more fancy footwork with K-12 funding.

“While revenues are slightly better than expected,” Hanson said, “this forecast doesn’t significantly change the budget challenges faced by the state.”

But the good news: Things aren’t worse.

Doug Grow writes about public affairs, state politics and other topics. He can be reached at dgrow [at] minnpost [dot] com.

Comments (2)

  1. Submitted by Richard Maher on 03/02/2010 - 06:13 pm.

    I am a City Council member in a rural Mn community.
    Since our governor continues his attempt to make a name as a “no tax increase governor” we are either forced to raise local taxes, or cut programs that effect all our local residents. The news that “maybe” our State is coming back to life is great news. WE just hope that our small rural communities can hang on until a new governor will accept the fact that if rural American is to survive we need help.

  2. Submitted by joe totall on 03/03/2010 - 07:53 am.

    So Tim is deep into his second term as govenor and we are looking at an ongoing, $3 billion a year in revenue shortfall. It also appears that the best he can do for the state’s budget next year is to juggle school funding and or take from the poorest of us all to put yet another annual band aid on his terrible attemtpt to correct, as in his words “we have a spending problem not a revenue problem” budget crisis.
    I am all for Tim trying to make the state run more efficiently but can anyone say that the real hard work of doing this has been done by his office. Sure he has cut state spending, but at the expense of county and city budgets. Unfortunatly we can’t quantify that “savings” but if it is anything like his math on the GAMC savings I am sure we are all paying more.

    As a co worker once said to me “my job is to do no harm”. Do you think Tim can honestly say that when he leaves office.

Leave a Reply