Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


Census numbers released: Minnesota retains all eight congressional districts

Barely — just barely — Minnesota is a winner in the 2010 Census results released Tuesday. But barely is good enough in this contest with enormous political stakes. The state gets to keep its eight seats in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Minnesota won the last available seat with just 8,739 people to spare, said Kimball Brace of Election Data Services Inc. in Manassas, Virginia. Had the state counted that many fewer people — or, had the next two states in line, North Carolina and Missouri, counted about 15,000 more residents, Minnesota would have lost the seat, he said.

“You got that seat just by the hair of your chinny-chin-chin, just by counting 8,739 people,” Brace said. “Whatever Minnesota may have spent on making sure everybody participated in the census, you are reaping the benefits of that today. This was money well spent.”

The state’s official population count in April this year was 5,314,879, the U.S. Census Bureau announced on Tuesday, up 7.8 percent from 10 years ago. The state’s growth rate was below the national average of 9.7 percent.

Minnesota’s growth ranks the state high enough in the congressional reapportionment process to hold the same number of congressional seats it has claimed since 1960.

So, if you completed your form last April, pat yourself on the back. (If you didn’t, well…!)

Some 74 percent of the 134 million households contacted nationwide for the 2010 Census did complete the 10-question form. Scant reason not to do so — it was one of the shortest forms in the nation’s history, with just 10 questions.

Nationally, the population count was 308,745,538.

Nose count: state and nation

This is the first announcement of results from this census, the 23rd nose count the nation has conducted. It gives us the results for the nation as a whole and for each of the 50 states. Further results — such as the population counts at the county and local levels and also breakdowns along ethnic lines — are scheduled to come out next year.

Overall, the census reveals the continuation of a trend that has gone on for decades, Robert Groves, the director of the U.S. Census Bureau said at a press conference connected via webinar and telephone with reporters nationwide.

The South and the West grew at the expense of the Northeast and the Midwest.

Among Midwestern states, Minnesota’s growth was second only — by a hair —to South Dakota, which grew by 7.9 percent. Except for Michigan, no other Midwestern state actually lost population, but some grew far slower than the nation as a whole. Illinois, for example, grew by just 3.3 percent

Nationwide, the fastest growing state was Nevada with a booming 35.1 percent growth over the decade.

Eight states lost one House seat each: Iowa, Illinois, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. New York and Ohio each lost two seats.

States that lost congressional seats will likely have to match incumbents against each other unless there are retirements in side-by-side districts.

Texas, the biggest winner, picked up four seats. Florida gained two. Those gaining one were Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, South Carolina, Utah and Washington.

You get the picture. Beginning in 2013, Congress will tilt further toward states that are more Southern or Western — and, typically, more Republican.

The process of deciding the seats is more complicated than a straightforward population count. Each state is assigned one seat. Then, a complex apportionment formula allocates the remaining 385 congressional seats one at a time among the 50 states until all 435 seats are assigned. (You can learn more about apportionment here.)

The number of seats in the House has grown with the country. Initially the Constitution set the number of representatives at 65 from 1787 until the first Census of 1790, when it was increased to 105 members. In 1913, it was increased to the current 435 members. 

More than a seat

The stakes go well beyond a seat in the House chamber. Some $400 billion in federal funding is distributed each year to states and communities based on the census counts.

Further, the makeup of the Electoral College is based partly on the number of seats each state has in the U.S. House.

So a state’s sway over the selection of the nation’s president and vice president also is at stake. And we only have to look back at the 2000 election — when George W. Bush garnered 271 electoral votes, one more than the majority needed to win the presidency — to know that a single vote can make a difference.

Get ready for fireworks

To say that Minnesota doesn’t lose a congressional seat is not to say that the state escapes the politically charged work of redrawing the lines defining its congressional districts.

This first look at the census data sets in motion a process aimed at giving each citizen the same proportional representation in the U.S. House. After the 2000 Census, each Congress member represented about 647,000 people. 

Thanks to population growth, there will be 710,767 House members per representative in 2013.  

Even though most states retain the same number of House seats, no state is frozen in a 2000 population frame. People have moved around, of course. Some had more babies than others. Some chased jobs across district lines. In some pockets of the elderly, more died than elsewhere.

What’s true nationwide is true in Minnesota, too.

The Census Bureau won’t release district breakdowns until early next year. But most likely, the suburban and exurban districts currently held by Republicans John Kline and Michelle Bachman have gained residents and will have to give up some territory. And the districts held by Democrats Betty McCullom, Keith Ellison and Collin Peterson likely have lost residents or at least not gained as fast as the suburban areas.   

So the state still faces redistricting next year, and that is certain to be politically contentious — especially in a state where the Legislature and the governor are from opposite parties. Pundits from every political persuasion expect the state’s new district boundaries eventually will be drawn under court supervision.

What happens next

Commerce Secretary Gary Locke delivered the results of the census to President Obama this morning.

The next formal steps begin in January when Obama is to report the counts released today to the U.S. House which, in turn, is to inform each state governor of the number of representatives to which that state is entitled.

After that the Legislature has a go at drawing the lines in a plan which the governor can sign or veto.

In the likely case of a standoff, it goes to the court.

For an interactive census data map, go here. (Note: If you’re looking at the Census Bureau’s interactive maps, you may see two different population numbers for Minnesota. The state’s “apportionment population” cited in this story — 5,314,879 — includes some residents living outside the country such as military personnel. But planners often use a different number, the “resident population” on April 1, 2010. For Minnesota, that number is 5,303,925.)

Comments (7)

  1. Submitted by Tim Walker on 12/21/2010 - 11:55 am.

    Good news (on Minnesota not losing a House seat), and a thorough report. Thanks.

    Sharon wrote: “Beginning in 2013, Congress will tilt further toward states that are more Southern or Western – and, typically, more Republican.”

    Yes, but growth in these states came about through a combination of above-average birth rates AND an influx of northerners.

    It’s likely that migrating northerners would make these states “bluer” — but higher births would make these states “redder” (on the theory that the apple does not fall far from the tree). Which reason for growth was more prevalent, or was it a 50-50 split?

    So really, it remains to be seen what this southern and western growth means for these states and the nation as a whole. Perhaps the answers will be had in the more detailed analyses that will be forthcoming from the Census Bureau.

  2. Submitted by John Branstad on 12/21/2010 - 12:10 pm.

    “No Midwestern state actually lost population”

    The fine folks in Michigan might disagree with your contention, even though there are fewer of them now than in 2000…

  3. Submitted by Jeremy Powers on 12/21/2010 - 02:06 pm.

    I find it ironic that Rep. Michele Bachmann managed to keep her seat (or a seat) while improperly railing against the census effort.

    Then again, she is living irony, being appointed to the Intelligence Committee.

  4. Submitted by Sharon Schmickle on 12/21/2010 - 02:17 pm.

    Good catch, John. Initially, I had focused on our 5-state Upper Midwestern region. When I decided to shift the focus to the broader Midwest, I should have noted that Michigan lost population during the decade. Story will be changed.
    Thanks for your interest in the story.

  5. Submitted by Roger Buoen on 12/21/2010 - 02:20 pm.

    Thanks, John. You’re right, and the story has been corrected.

  6. Submitted by Robert Ryan on 12/21/2010 - 03:42 pm.

    One thing about Texas and Florida that will influence triditional politics is that the increase is in part a result of the birthrate among the Hispanic population. Their politics might not be quite the same as the aging white population of those states.

    Minnesota might want to figure out away to increase growth if they want to hold onto those 8 seats 10 years from now.

  7. Submitted by Steve McKay on 12/21/2010 - 09:40 pm.

    It is nice that we held on to our 8th seat. It does mean that we will allmost certainly go down to 7 seats for 2022.

    On a national basis, the new numbers help the republicans in a close election. If the 2004 election was rerun Bush would have received 6 more electorial votes. If you go back to the 2000 election (the last election under the 1990 census) and rerun it with 2012 numbers Bush would have received 12 more electorial votes. In a replay of 2000, the republican would receive 283 ECV and the democrat 255.

    In a close election, the republican would have to carry Florida and the democrat Pennsylvania. The republican would most likely still need to carry Ohio. What is different is that the rep. could lose OH and still win by picking up either Iowa (6 ECV) or Wisconsin (10 ECV). However, Colorado (9), Nevada (6) and New Hampshire (4) are possible pickups for a dem.

    Ohio looks like it is still the key swing state. A democrat needs OH unless he would run the table and win CO, NV and NH while holding IA and WI. If the rep. lost OH he would need to win 24 of the remaining 35 ECVs. That would mean both CO and WI and either IA or NV. If he lost CO or WI he would need to win all four of the other states.

    The end result in a close election is still OHIO!

Leave a Reply