Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.

Donate

Freshman GOP Sen. John Howe took on big issues and, occasionally, his party

Sen. John Howe attempted to alter the funding source for the Vikings stadium during the debate on the bill.

RED WING, Minn. — It seems like everybody here likes — or at least respects — John Howe.

The charismatic freshman state senator can’t walk down the street without greeting a constituent, cracking a joke with a friend or stopping to pick up a windblown recycling container. Howe, the city’s former mayor, swept into office with the Republicans’ 2010 electoral wave.

But there’s a difference between Howe and many of the new hard-line Republicans who now make up a vocal minority of the Senate GOP caucus: Although he’s stuck to his principles, he’s also been willing to compromise, a rare practice for some Capitol politicians.

“Compromise shouldn’t be a dirty word,” Howe said when MinnPost visited him in his district recently. “It’s not about compromising your principles. It’s about standing with your principles and yet achieving a result that you can get done.”

Howe has partnered with DFLers – and pretty much anyone else — in an attempt to help shape several key pieces of legislation passed over the last two years. If not for the realities of political maneuvering, his efforts may have stuck — on the Vikings stadium bill, on Voter ID and on statewide tax policy.

Despite some backlash from other Republicans over his controversial positions, it appears Howe is headed for a second term and more political dustups.

“I … think [voters] appreciate the fact that he’s willing to step out of the typical comfort zone for politicians and look for solutions working across party lines,” Ben Golnik, a political strategist who helped the Republicans take the Senate in 2010, said in an interview. “I think [Howe] made a name for himself here in his first two years, and I think he’s well positioned to get re-elected.”

Supporters cite Howe’s sincerity

Whether he’s pacing around his old City Hall office, meeting with friends and advisers for coffee or giving a tour of his home, Howe’s message of fiscal conservatism shows up in both his personal and public lives.

Howe very happyMinnPost photo by James NordSen. John Howe, right, greets Viking lobbyists.

Howe, a property owner who built up a series of Sears franchises before working for Wells Fargo, is loath to take out a loan in his business life. Likewise, at the Capitol, he opposed using statewide tax dollars to fund the Vikings stadium.

Supporters say they value his sincerity.

Steve Stubbe, a retired airline pilot, became an ally when he met Howe early in the 2010 campaign.

“He’s a regular guy, and I know that he’s a sincere guy,” Stubbe said after he and a group of friends met with Howe for coffee recently.

Stubbe’s enthusiasm shows as he describes driving Howe to campaign events and helping him meet voters door to door. He, like others, praises Howe for being willing to fight against the status quo for a common-sense solution, even if that means siding with a Democrat.

In fact, Howe said he’s working with Gov. Mark Dayton and at least one DFL senator to create a nonpartisan working group to address issues like education as they arise next session. Howe sees the group as a way to cut through the gridlock at the Capitol.

“He’s got guts. He has chutzpah … he does. He doesn’t mind getting in your face and asking the hard questions,” Stubbe said. “Polarization was a big deal in door-knocking, and we heard that loud and clear.”

Howe in 2011 proposed to broaden the sales tax base, prompting criticism from Republicans who mistakenly thought he wanted to increase taxes.=

“Certainly there was [backlash] last year” during the 2011 session, he said. “The party actually made phone calls against me in my district.”

Howe, however, believes the broader sales tax would bring in enough new revenue to eventually abolish Minnesota’s income tax. He also believes such a move would cut down on budget highs and lows from biennium to biennium.    

But that didn’t deter Howe from taking other controversial positions. This session, he proposed amendments to both the proposed Photo ID constitutional amendment and the $1 billionVikings stadium plan that would have drastically altered the look of each bill.

He also — predictably — bucked Senate tradition.

“When you’re first elected, especially in the Senate, you’re supposed to sit there for a few years and not rock the boat for anybody, but [Howe] jumped right in and he didn’t go through his probationary period,” said Lyle Mehrkens, a former lawmaker from the district who persuaded Howe to run for office. “We really don’t have time for those probationary periods anymore.”

And Senate Republicans told him to be quiet, Howe recalled. One leader in former Majority Leader Amy Koch’s team told him, “Howe, quit fighting the party.”

In traditional form, he said he replied: “I’m not fighting the party. I’m trying to save the party.”

A maverick on several big issues

Howe’s maverick take on the legislative experience was perhaps most apparent in this session’s Photo ID debate.

During a Senate floor session, Howe successfully broadened the language of the Republican-backed constitutional amendment that would require a “government-issued photographic identification” to vote. He added wording that would allow for “equivalent” identification measures, a move that many Democrats supported because it would allow future Legislatures to adapt the law for technological improvements.

“Let the argument win on its merits,” the senator tells pretty much anyone who’ll listen.

The measure passed 63-3.

Sen. Howe and Sen. NewmanMinnPost photo by James NordSen. Scott Newman speaking with Howe during the Senate Voter ID debate

But the wording didn’t survive. Howe was never named to the conference committee that eventually ironed out the differences between the House and Senate bills. So, he wasn’t there when the language was removed, and he remained relatively quiet on the Senate floor when the body re-passed the amendment along near party lines. In the process, he also got labeled as a Photo ID opponent.

“Just because I have another way of getting it done?” he asked out loud, relaying the story months later.

The $1 billion Vikings stadium bill, which passed earlier this month, is another big piece of mammoth legislation Howe attempted to shape.

He proposed an amendment — in committee and on the Senate floor — that would have funded the state’s share of the stadium with user fees. The final version, which he proposed on the Senate floor, would have imposed a nearly 10 percent fee on tickets, concessions, merchandise, naming rights and suite sales.

It passed on a 34-33 vote, but the amendment didn’t last long, either. Howe said the governor’s deputy chief of staff for legislative affairs, Michelle Kelm-Helgen, persuaded four lawmakers to switch their votes and support the original deal, which funds the stadium through expanded charitable gambling.

Howe’s persistence at rewriting the stadium deal also threw off some Vikings fans. Cory Merrifield, who runs SavetheVikes.org, was concerned when Howe repeatedly attempted to amend the bill.

Merrifield said he remembered thinking, “Is he pulling a [Sen.] Sean Nienow and trying to kill this thing?”

“I guess I want to assume the best … but cooler heads prevailed,” Merrifield said, noting that GOP Sen. Julie Rosen, the bill’s chief author, said the fees would be a deal-killer.

Still, Merrifield said he respects someone who is fighting for what he believes is right.

And despite the hours of work and high-profile disappointments, Howe doesn’t appear bitter about his failed attempts to shape the products of his first legislative biennium.

“If you have a thoughtful approach and you do your homework and you’re prepared, you can influence the outcome,” he said. “[Just] maybe not to the extent that you want.”

And despite scuffles in the party and some high-profile legislative overreaches, insiders like Golnik predict a victory for Howe.

Golnik pointed to Howe’s April endorsing convention, where activists unanimously backed him. The Republican strategist said much of the controversy surrounding Howe is too “inside baseball” for the average voter.

“I’m pretty confident I’ll get re-elected,” Howe said. “I think most people here know that I’m really dedicated, and that doesn’t mean I’m not going to work hard at doing it, because if it’s worth doing, you’ve got to put an effort into it.”

“I’m a firm believer: If it doesn’t kill you, it makes you stronger,” he said. “I think I was a voice of reason out there, and I think there’s a lot of support for trying to get things done and work together.”

Comments (7)

  1. Submitted by Robert Gauthier on 06/04/2012 - 10:21 am.

    Good story

    It looks like Sen. Howe’s biggest risk to reelection is his own party.

  2. Submitted by John Edwards on 06/04/2012 - 11:16 am.

    Double standard

    Can anyone locate any stories by reporters or other liberals in MinnPost, the Star-Tribune or the Pioneer Press about the need to reach across the aisle and compromise prior to the popular election of Republican majorities to both legislative chambers in 2010? I can’t.

    • Submitted by Logan Foreman on 06/04/2012 - 09:32 pm.

      Compromise with Pawlenty –

      He could not spell the word. Also had difficulties differentiating fees and taxes.

  3. Submitted by Dennis Tester on 06/04/2012 - 12:56 pm.

    Howe’s naive

    regarding the sales tax. Most conservatives would agree that taxing a man’s consumption is fairer and more productive than taxing his labor but you can’t increase the sales tax without simultaneously scrapping the income tax. That wouldn’t be possible unless you had a republican governor and republican control of both houses because the democrats would love the increased revenue but would drag their feet about ever eliminating the income tax, leaving us with both. It’s disappointing that he doesn’t realize that.

  4. Submitted by Connie Sullivan on 06/04/2012 - 02:13 pm.

    He’s sincere, and probably a nice guy. But to call his moves in the legislature “compromises” is more wishful thinking than anything else. He remains a No New Taxes Republican. He remains a promoter of voter ID. Only the typical rigid GOPer would be frightened of a man who disobeys the rule that freshmen are to be seen and not heard, and who comes up with slight modifications of bills that remain the same but have a tiny change.

  5. Submitted by rick mcnamara on 06/05/2012 - 11:13 am.

    john howe

    nord gets an f for reporting skill and an a for puff piece spin. mr howe won 2 of 12 red wing precincts in 2010 against his rookie dfl opponent.

  6. Submitted by Dean Adams on 07/08/2012 - 08:48 am.

    As A Writer You Know You’ve Failed When

    Your poorly written puff piece on a pompous blowhard is used by said pompous blowhard as a campaign infomercial. I saw this as an insert in the Republican Eagle newspaper here in Red Wing and assumed that because it was so horribly written and lacked really any journalistic integrity that Howe must have penned it himself–in between bouts of patting his own back. Imagine my surprise to learn that James Nord is apparently an actual person and not just a Howe pen name.

    Best part of the copy inserted into the local paper is Howe putting his whole name at the top of it–JOHN STERLING HOWE. Reminds me of the pompous rich guy on Gilligan’s Island THURSTON HOWELL III.

    Best line: “Whether he’s pacing around his old City Hall office, meeting with friends and advisers for coffee or giving a tour of his home …”

    Howe should fire his PR staff and just hire James Nord. Or maybe he already did.

Leave a Reply