Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


Dayton budget would boost spending and increase high-income taxes

MinnPost photo by James Nord
Gov. Dayton challenged his critics to specify exactly where they would make further cuts.

Gov. Mark Dayton outlined his “Budget for a Better Minnesota” plan [PDF] Tuesday, recommending substantial tax changes, including the promised higher income taxes on top income-earners, property tax relief and lower — but broader — sales tax.

Dayton proposed spending $37.9 billion in the next biennium, an increase of 7.6 percent over the current biennium. He also called for $3.6 billion in tax increases, $1.4 billion in property tax relief and $1 billion in new spending, plus $225 million in spending cuts.

Included in the budget “package” [PDF] — which also fills in a projected $1.1 billion budget deficit — are:

  • An income tax hike on the top 2 percent of Minnesotans — couples with taxable income of $250,000 or more — totaling $1.1 billion. (Individuals with taxable income of more than $150,000 also would be affected.)
  • A broadening of the sales tax base to include clothing costing more than $100 and online goods and services, with a reduction of the rate from 6.875 percent to 5.5 percent, resulting in $2.1 billion in new revenue.
  • Property tax relief of up to $500 per family, totaling a $1.4 billion reduction.
  • A 94-cent tax increase for tobacco, totaling $370 million.
  • A $300 million increase in K-12 education funding, $240 million in new money for higher education and $120 million for Local Government Aid and County Program Aid.

“Some will say we spend too much in this budget, and some will say we don’t spend enough,” Dayton said. “To those who claim this spending is too high, I challenge you to say exactly where more cuts should be made. And to those who say we need to spend more, I challenge you to say exactly where the money should come from.”

Expenditure growth in Governor’s proposal over current biennium

chart of expenditures in 2014–15 budget
Source: Minnesota Management & Budget
*Debt service and all other areas (capital projects) growth distorted by use use of tobacco/appropriation bonds in FY 2012-13 budget solution

The governor said his budget plan will end the “fiscal games, accounting gimmicks, payment delays and other financial manipulations” of the last decade.

Dayton’s proposal marks the starting point for legislative negotiations over the state’s two-year budget. Legislative committees are scheduled to begin picking through the specifics of the proposal on Wednesday. Last week, lawmakers started considering tax changes that they expected would be included in Dayton’s larger package.

Although the governor enjoys friendly majorities in the House and Senate for the first time in two decades, political and geographic considerations all but ensure a messy path toward a finished budget deal.

Republicans are poised to oppose DFL-backed tax increases, and the governor himself has rejected some plans — such as a proposed gas tax hike to fund Minnesota’s ailing roads and bridges.

Revenue growth in Governor’s proposal over current biennium

Revenue growth over current biennium
Source: Minnesota Management & Budget

Some of the key seats DFLers picked up in November to regain control of the Legislature are occupied by suburbanites who may be reluctant to support some of Dayton’s tax proposals.

Lawmakers may also face difficulty selling the expanded sales tax to businesses and Minnesotans who are accustomed to the exemptions on clothes and services. Expanding state taxes to online purchases may face an easier path because it has business community support and has been framed as a fairness issue for local businesses.

On top of the medley of tax increases and spending cuts, herding 201 lawmakers toward a final product will pose logistical challenges. The DFL lawmakers in charge of legislative policy areas — from Health and Human Services to the powerful Senate Finance Committee — have significantly more experience than the governor in state budgeting, a departure from the relatively fresh class of GOP lawmakers that took over last session.

Legislative priorities – highlighted in some of the first bills of the session — range from paying back the school shift to property tax relief. Dayton’s proposal doesn’t include funding to pay back the shift.

DFL lawmakers complained during the governor’s first budget negotiations — which came in the midst of the painful 2011 government shutdown — that Dayton ignored the minority caucuses when he struck a controversial deal with Republicans to solve the state’s then-$5 billion shortfall and end the government shutdown.

It’s unclear how the governor and the newly graduated DFL leaders will grow into their fresh negotiating roles — though Dayton, House Speaker Paul Thissen and Senate Majority Leader Tom Bakk have said they got to know each other well during the 2010 gubernatorial campaign, which they’ve stressed will come in handy.

House and Senate Democrats and Republicans are offering their early reactions to the governor’s Tuesday afternoon.

Bakk has said Dayton enjoys an advantage in the budgeting process because he has direct access to the state agencies. Lawmakers mostly spent the first two weeks of session reviewing the November budget forecast and getting acquainted with their committees’ budget sectors while Dayton put the finishing touches on his proposal.

Despite the governor’s exhaustive budget planning, drastic fluctuations in the national economy could mean the package lawmakers ultimately pass closer to May will look a lot different than the one unveiled today.

State finance officials said the November economic forecast, which helped shape the governor’s budget proposal, was one of the shakiest projections they had ever seen.

“In my tenure here, I cannot remember a forecast with so much uncertainty built in,” Bakk told reporters after it was released in early December.

Uncertainty over the fiscal cliff crisis and other federal budget negotiations led state officials in December to conclude that the next economic forecast – set for release on Feb. 28 – would be key in budget decisions.

But with the national uncertainty delayed rather than solved, the February forecast might not provide the clarity that lawmakers are counting on.

Current projections indicate the state will have roughly $35.8 billion to spend over the next two years, but the forecast shows $36.9 billion in revenue needed to maintain current funding levels.

“The future really is at stake,” Dayton said in explaining why he wants to boost spending to $37.9 billion.

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (6)

  1. Submitted by Jeremy Powers on 01/22/2013 - 04:13 pm.

    Finally! A plan! No just a magic trick

    About damn time our leaders looked at our broken system and decided to really modify it instead of a band aid and a placebo. The last decade has been a train wreck for this once great state. Our job creation during Pawlenty was awful and during the past two years, when the rest of the country is beginning to come back up to speed, we’ve been stalling.

    • Submitted by Bob Petersen on 01/23/2013 - 08:11 am.

      Always on TPaw

      You forget that Pawlenty had a DFL legislature always against him and wanting to spend more and more. Pawlenty actually kept that spending own to about twice the rate of inflation, not the more than double-digit increases the DFL always hollered for. Also, if the spending line wasn’t kept down, our budget right now would be much bigger and the $1.1B upcoming deficit would be several billion more if the DFL had their way.

  2. Submitted by Todd Hintz on 01/22/2013 - 04:18 pm.


    I’m looking forward to seeing Dayton’s budget play out. All the items seem sensible and reasonable, unlike the gimmicks we’ve endured from previous administrations. No more borrowing from Peter to pay Pauline or shifting taxes from one source to another and then disingenuously claiming taxes weren’t raised.

    The additional expenditures are particularly welcome as they’ll help put people back to work. The Minnesota unemployment rate is already getting down there at 5.5%, but the new projects the spending will create will help get even more people back to work. And working people buy products and pay taxes.

  3. Submitted by Neal Krasnoff on 01/22/2013 - 05:03 pm.


    If Dayton can remember back that far, he signed a bill redistributing taxpayer money to a billionaire sports team owner to built a stadium.

    The state obviously has too much money since they are spending it on luxury items. They don’t need any more of ours.

  4. Submitted by Bob Petersen on 01/23/2013 - 08:16 am.

    Why do we have to spend more than what we have?

    Dayton has shown what he is looking for. No surprise. But to keep taking and taking from everyone and to add on what the federal government and our president wants to do, we are never going to get out of the hole. California, Illinois, and New York are having budget crises and are looking to bankruptcy because they have done what Dayton and the DFL want to do. We are headed down that same path if we keep spending more of everyone’s money. Hopefully, with the cautious tone the DFL leadership has shown so far, they will listen and not allow Minnesota to be ruined.

  5. Submitted by Robert Moffitt on 01/23/2013 - 09:34 am.

    Re: tobacco taxes

    Since both the Dayton budget and a bill authored by Rep. Lenczewski, the House Tax Committee Chair, includes an increase on tobacco taxes, you can be pretty certain this will be the year taxes on tobacco go up.

    It’s about time. They have not risen since 2005, and we tax cigatettes at a much lower rate than Wisconsin, Iowa or South Dakota does.

    My organization (the American Lung Association in Minnesota) is among 30+ organizations supporting a tobacco tax increase, because we know tobacco use will drop is the price goes up.

Leave a Reply