Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


Why the Legislature will miss Ryan Winkler

Copyright Minnesota House of Representatives/Photo by Andrew VonBank
Rep. Ryan Winkler will continue to spend about half his time in Minnesota as general counsel for Biothera, a Minnesota-based biotech company.

People come and go from the Minnesota Legislature. Ambition for higher office, election losses, disappointment with the process, personal issues — all lead to change. The institution keeps stumbling along. 

Some legislators, though, are missed more than others. Ryan Winkler will be one of those whose absence will be noticed.

Winkler, a DFLer from Golden Valley first elected in 2006, announced last week that he will be resigning his seat at the conclusion of a special session, brought a combination of passion and biting wit to the Minnesota House.

He’s leaving because his spouse, Jenny, has accepted a position as a senior vice president and general counsel for Rezidor Hotel Group, a Belgium-based hotel management company. The professional advancement for her, the chance for the family to be closer to her family in Sweden, and the opportunity for their two children to taste life in Europe all made this seem a logical move. Winkler will continue to spend about half his time in Minnesota as general counsel for Biothera, a Minnesota-based biotech company.

“We’re very fortunate,” the 39-year-old Winkler said of the move. “This was one of those positive decisions.” 

Peggy Flanagan, executive director of Children’s Defense Fund Minnesota and a former member of the Minneapolis Board of Education, has already announced she’s running for Winkler’s seat. Others are expected to also make a bid for a seat that appears to be solidly DFL.

So Winkler’s seat will not mean much when it comes to the party alignment of the House. But his absence will be noticed. 

Rep. Pat Garofalo, R-Farmington, often engaged in funny, pointed exchanges with Winkler, so much so that outsiders might have considered their debates in the House downright nasty. “Anyone who takes Ryan’s barbs personally doesn’t understand that that’s politics,” Garofalo said. “Like Michael Corleone said in The Godfather, ‘It’s not personal, it’s business.”’

On the last night of the regular session, for example, Winkler took great delight in challenging House Majority Leader Joyce Peppin about a $12 million item in the state government finance bill. 

Republicans were refusing to come out and say that the $12 million was for the new Senate office building, which the GOP had claimed to be outraged about during the 2014 election campaign. Winkler congratulated Peppin for having recently graduated from law school. Then, over and over, Winkler — a lawyer himself — asked her to define “property.” Peppin refused. Winkler kept jabbing. DFLers sat back, enjoying the show.

Finally, Peppin snapped. “It’s about 10 o’clock. We have two bills to do. We can play these little games later.”

Winkler countered: “You’re free falling to the concrete and headed to a special session. We have no reason to filibuster your failures.”

Rep. Ryan Winkler and Rep. Pat Garofalo tangling on Twitter.
Copyright Minnesota House of Representatives/Photo by Paul Battaglia
Rep. Ryan Winkler and Rep. Pat Garofalo tangling on Twitter.

Garofalo said Ryan’s style reminded him of the agitator in hockey. “He’s the equivalent of a fist-fighting instigator who can knock you on your ass but who also has the talent to score goals,” he said. “There aren’t many players like that in hockey, and even fewer legislators like that in the House.” 

In fact, Winkler said he may have learned his debating style as a hockey player for a so-so Bemidji High School team a couple of decades ago. “We weren’t all that good, so when you’re playing a team that’s stronger than you, you learn that if you’re going to have a chance you’d better go for the body.”

But Winkler said those blows aren’t personal — and most in the legislature understand that. Last week, after the clock struck midnight and the session ended, Winkler went to the retiring room, which is off limits to all but House members. There, he schmoozed and shook hands with members of the GOP caucus, including Peppin.

There are reasons — theatrical and philosophical — for his style, Winkler said. “Sometimes, especially near the end of the session, the hours are endless,” he said. “There’s this desire to stir things up little and have some fun, create some action. But, more importantly, there’s power in telling the truth and not being afraid to tell the truth. The truth is a powerful thing if you’re willing to use it.”

Of course, “truth” in the political arena is in the eye of the beholder. Winkler represents the passionate progressive spectrum of the DFL. No one pushed more relentlessly for an increase in the minimum wage than Winkler, for instance, despite the fact that it meant he often was in the face of Senate DFL leadership, which was not eager for substantial increases. 

The increase passed during the 2014 session, and last August, the minimum wage jumped from $6.15 to $8. By Aug. 1, 2016, it will be $9.50. With the law change, about 300,000 minimum wage workers in Minnesota got a raise.

But the most important aspect of the legislation, according to Winkler, is the fact that in ensuing years, there will be annual increases tied to the cost of living — a point Winkler absolutely refused to budge on during the debate. Assuming changes aren’t made — and many business groups, GOP legislators and even some frightened DFLers are pushing for some alterations — the minimum wage will not be stagnant as it has been in the past. 

“I’m somebody who believes that people who work deserve dignity, they deserve the right to support their families,” Winkler said. “I know, that seems like a radical idea, given the way society has evolved and been manipulated in the last few decades.” 

When it served purposes he believed in, Winkler would even team with the other side of the aisle, even against a DFL administration. In 2013, Winkler and Garofalo joined together to write an op-ed piece for the Star Tribune, criticizing Gov. Mark Dayton’s Department of Education for stances it was taking regarding scholarships for children from low-income families. (The department wanted tight caps on scholarship amounts.) 

“It was like the Hatfields and the McCoys joining forces,” said Garofalo of working with Winkler on that piece, “but he wasn’t afraid to ruffle a few feathers to advocate for the best interests of kids.”

That issue — scholarships versus Dayton’s desire to offer universal pre-K — goes on. As will the Legislature. But without Winkler, there’ll be a little less passion. And a lot less laughter.

Comments (3)

  1. Submitted by Eric Larson on 05/26/2015 - 06:11 pm.

    Few if any are going to miss Rep Winkler.

    “Winkler kept jabbing. DFLers sat back, enjoying the show”. For years good government types, middle of the roadsters, dreamers, and more than a few left of center journalists have bemoaned the way the legislature closes out their sessions. Too rushed, too unplanned, late night jam downs etc. So here we are with billions of taxpayer money at stake, thousands of people’s daily lives, jobs and well being in the balance. And Rep. Winkler plays games, with the DFL legislators ‘enjoying the show’. If the author ever wrote a story about how screwed up the MN/HOUSE/SENATE are, then he’s got some ‘splaining to do. On the last night of the session, Rep. Winkler was wasting everybody’s time in juvenile behaviour. He will not be fondly remembered. 1) Accused a sitting member of the US Supreme Court of being an ‘Uncle Tom’. A VILE and definitely an Un-Minnesota thing to say. He then said he didn’t realize how offensive his comments were. Right- He is the holder of an undergraduate degree in History from HARVARD. He holds a law degree from the U of M. He holds an partisan political seat in a partisan political elective body. His mea culpa was not believable. To all of us who hold degrees in history and law, we are embarrassed. Both Harvard and the U of M should denounce him. By calling it quits after the session ended, there is a silver lining. 2) No end of session goodbye speech. No applause of his peers. 3) Going away parties will be limited. All his colleagues will be back home in their districts. 4) DFL party delegates up the chain can breath a relief and say ‘uffda’. They won’t squirm at some future endorsing convention when his name gets added to the ballot. 5) His time in Minnesota politics didn’t reach footnote status. Now it’s time for his mark to fadeaway. C’mon Minnpost, put this up on the comments section.

    • Submitted by Scott Stocking on 05/26/2015 - 10:05 pm.

      Thank you

      Mr. Larson for speaking on behalf of all history majors and lawyers. Also, thank you for for pointing out that Rep. Winkler’s shenanigans at the end of the session are a much, much worse waste of time at the end of the session than a fawning speech about this august body to the golf claps of his peers. Oh, and congratulations, your comment made it past the moderators.

  2. Submitted by Bill Gleason on 05/27/2015 - 02:17 pm.

    Winkler can be annoying to the right,

    just as Franson can be annoying to the left.

    It goes with the territory. Mr Pat Garofalo or Tom Rukavina had it about right. They seemed to be partisan but could be reasonable when push came to shove.

    The thing that amuses me about Winkler and the right is that they seem particularly intent on framing him as a racist for his unfortunate mistake of referring to Justice Thomas as Uncle Tom. Even though he has apologized multiple times and moved on. “But, but, but … Winkler is a racist!”

    This rally hasn’t had much traction among the electorate because it is obviously a false claim, witness his stand on actual legislation. One of the local right wing bloggers/broadcasters seems especially intent on this line of thinking and has even written a blog post about the media protecting Winkler.

    The Problem With Ryan Winkler…

    “But as I – and quite a few other people – noted when Winkler announced his retirement, Winkler was only the symptom. The disease? The Minnesota Media’s double-standard.”

    So, as usual, we have the right whimpering about the double-standard of the media. And the left laughing about another attempt by the right to turn a molehill into a mountain.

Leave a Reply