St. Paul soccer stadium study: don’t even think about driving to a game

MinnPost photo by Marcus Ekblom
The traffic study estimates that 6,200 fans will arrive on light rail, 700 on the new A Line bus rapid transit line and upwards of 9,000 on shuttles from remote parking.

If you are planning ahead for a trip to a Minnesota United game once the Major League Soccer team christens a planned stadium in St. Paul’s Midway area in 2018, don’t drive.

Like, really, don’t drive.

A just-released environmental assessment and traffic study predicts drivers who try to drive to and park near the proposed 20,000-seat soccer stadium will not only be unsuccessful — they will also add to game-day congestion, what with all that cruising for a space. Only about 750 on-site and nearby parking stalls are anticipated when the stadium opens in 2018.

At an estimated average of 2.7 fans per car, that’s only 2,100 fans who can arrive by car, or a bit more than 10 percent of the attendees.

The rest likely will need to use transit or a yet-to-be-developed park-and-ride system that will shuttle fans from off-site parking — perhaps at the state fair grounds or downtown St. Paul. The traffic study estimates that 6,200 fans will arrive on light rail, 700 on the new A Line bus rapid transit line and upwards of 9,000 on shuttles from remote parking. That means that nearly 80 percent of the new team’s fans are expected to arrive by those modes.

The final 10 percent are expected to walk (3 to 5 percent), bike (2 percent) take regular Metro Transit bus routes (1.5 percent) catch charter buses from outside the area (1 to 3 percent) or ride private shuttles (2 to 3 percent).

The environmental study (technically an Alternative Urban Areawide Review or AUAR) covers both the stadium site and the adjacent RK Midway shopping center. The assessment reviews the impacts of the short-term construction and operation of the stadium as well as the longer-term impacts of the full redevelopment of the shopping center. The long-term assessment uses 2035 as reference point, and not only includes commercial, retail and residential development at RK Midway but the projected expansion of the stadium from 20,000 to 25,500 fans.

The study did not report any roadblocks to either the stadium plan or the build-out of the redevelopment expected to occur over two decades.

“While there is a lot of detail in the report, the main take-away is that there is nothing in this analysis that says we can’t move forward with a soccer stadium as envisioned,” said St. Paul planning and economic development director Jonathan Sage-Martinson. In a statement released Monday morning, Sage-Martinson said there will be adequate parking and that traffic can be managed with existing infrastructure.

The city will host a public briefing and open house on the study Tuesday at 7 p.m. at Concordia University’s Buenger Education Center. City officials could approve plans and make clarifying changes to area zoning by August, with construction beginning after that. The hoped-for opening of the stadium is Spring 2018.

Of course, that timeline depends on the resolution of a standoff between Gov. Mark Dayton and Republicans who control the Minnesota House over the governor’s veto of a tax bill that contained a property tax break sought by the city and the team owners.

Minnesota United FC soccer stadium Opening Day site plan
Minnesota United FC soccer stadium Opening Day site plan

No roadblocks (environmentally at least)

The environmental impacts of both the stadium and the redevelopment of RK Midway are considered minimal, mostly because the site currently holds a strip mall surrounded by parking and a mostly abandoned vacant lot that, until 2001, held Metro Transit’s bus storage and maintenance facility.

More than 98 percent of the nearly 35 acre site is currently covered by buildings or pavement, the study reports. Once the plan is completed, more than 10 percent will be green space. There is no surface water on the site and no wetlands. The water table is 25-to-30 feet below the surface, and no endangered species are present.

In addition to traffic, the impact on neighbors was primarily noise from stadium announcements and fans. The study suggests controlling the volume of stadium announcements and taking steps to direct that noise internally. The report also states that no music concerts will be held at the outdoor stadium.

Light rail congestion

The study anticipates that so many fans will ride light rail, bus rapid transit or shuttles to park and ride lots that planners will need to provide larger places for them to wait to board.

The study estimates that more than 2,050 fans at any time will be lining up to board westbound LRT trains and 1,700 for eastbound trains. According to federal standards, to accommodate that number of would-be riders there will need to be 16,500 square feet of queuing space (for riders heading to Minneapolis) and 13,750 square feet (for those heading toward downtown St. Paul).

There appears to be enough room on the Snelling Avenue sidewalks to hold those trying to board BRT buses. But stadium planners will need to provide a larger queuing area for those trying to board park-and-ride shuttles: 25,000 square feet for the estimated 3,050 passengers who will be trying to board those buses.

The review does express concerns that the present location of shuttle bus loading — south of the stadium on St. Anthony — would put buses in conflict with what will be the most-congested post-game intersection in the area, at Snelling and Interstate 94. “Shuttle service along St. Anthony may need to be reconsidered because of this bottleneck.”

LRT trains
MinnPost photo by Bill Kelley
The study estimates that more than 2,050 fans at any time will be lining up to board westbound LRT trains and 1,700 for eastbound trains.

The intention is to clear all fans from the site within an hour of the end of a game, but the study encourages the team and city to plan events to encourage fans to arrive early and stay in the area later. It estimates that while 95 percent of fans will try to leave the stadium area within an hour after games, it projects that only 85 percent will arrive less than an hour before a weekday game and that 75 percent will arrive within an hour of a weekend game.

“The team should consider activities/concerts/etc. before and after match events to spread out arrival and departure times,” the study recommends.

The review also notes that weekend afternoon games — a common MLS start time — would bump up against the busiest traffic times for the neighboring shopping sites. It recommends that what it calls “capacity events” be held on weekend evenings.

Still a lot of cars

The study anticipates that many of the fans who ride light rail or bus rapid transit will use cars for part of their trip, parking elsewhere along the routes and using transit for the final leg. That’s why it suggests that soccer games not coincide with Vikings or Gopher football games, which would rely on some of the same parking ramps, or during the state fair.

A lack of on-site parking has been cited as a problem by some stadium critics. Either fans will be inconvenienced or neighbors will be forced to compete for on-street parking near their homes. But stadium backers, led by St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman, have maintained that the transit systems near the stadium site will take up much of the load.

The study might underestimate the availability of parking nearby, though. While there are privately owned ramps near Snelling and University avenues, the study released Monday does not count any of that parking inventory. Private parking owners might be willing to rent spaces to fans, but they might not. The study identified 2,500 off-site parking spaces within one mile of the stadium.

And the city does not count on-street parking because it doesn’t want to encourage car-driving fans to park in the heavily single-family neighborhoods around the site.

The study worries that fans will still drive to the stadium in hopes of finding parking. To head off such optimism, the report states that “communication must be stated that if you do not have a reserved parking space for the event, then please take transit or shuttle buses….” It suggests that the close-in parking spaces should be sold with tickets.

Future problems?

Stadium backers have predicted that as the RK Midway site develops with apartments, commercial office towers and retail outlets, many buildings will include structured parking. But the study warns that traffic on the adjacent streets will make it difficult to exit that part of the site, potentially leading to wait times as long as two hours.  “Additional parking should be found away from the site and have good access to the other interchanges of I-94, not Snelling Avenue,” it states.

The study projects that current streets and intersections can accommodate vehicular traffic, but it also acknowledges that there will be congestions and backups as cars filter to arterials and I-94. The Snelling and University intersection is already one of the state’s most crowded — and complicated.

As the RK Midway site is completely redeveloped, traffic is expected to worsen unless changes are made to the streets. It recommends updating the traffic studies regularly as the area redevelops.

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (12)

  1. Submitted by Allan Wilson on 06/07/2016 - 11:30 am.

    Nein Parking!

    Well, this is a rather authoritarian article! Don’t even THINK about parking at the new, three
    billionaire financed soccer stadium. Methinks most people will give this idea a middle finger up.

    PS Good luck at the public hearing tonight. You may need it.

  2. Submitted by David Markle on 06/07/2016 - 11:39 am.


    It will be interesting to see whether lack of parking produces light rail congestion or simply inhibits attendance. As one letter-writer to the Pioneer Press asked, how many people take transit to attend church?

    Many Blue Line trains are packed with riders to and from Twins games, but the Blue Line offers a reasonably fast trip from distant parking areas. The slow Green Line trains were full of attendees to Vikings games at the University stadium, but with those taking the short ride from and back to downtown Minneapolis, not St. Paul.

    If those optimistic predictions for transit use to soccer games prove true, they will only underscore my own dismay and predictions concerning the short-sighted limitations placed on Green Line capacity by alignment on the street–rather than along I-94–and lack of tunneling in downtown areas.

    But if they merely prove overly optimistic, that may be due to the Green Line’s inconvenient slow transit speed, caused by those same short-sighted limitations that prevent the expensive LRT trains from running as trains should.

  3. Submitted by Pat Berg on 06/07/2016 - 11:46 am.

    How about 94?

    How backed up is 94 going to get every time there’s a game? No one seems to be talking about that.

    • Submitted by Steve Titterud on 06/07/2016 - 01:31 pm.

      It should be no more clogged than

      …the University area when there’s a football game, or downtown will be when the Vikings palace opens. Thankfully, Twins attendance is suppressed by low quality baseball, otherwise it would be worse.

      The inconvenience of traffic caused by sports fan is nothing new, and fans trying to get to the soccer games will soon figure out they probably don’t want to drive very close.

  4. Submitted by Matthew Steele on 06/07/2016 - 02:01 pm.

    Too much parking

    Look at that temporary site plan. The stadium will nearly completely be surrounded by “temporary” surface parking. That’s a little scary for the neighborhood, more scary than the thought of people parking on residential streets. What happens if the surrounding development doesn’t take place? This will be surrounded by a sea of ugly surface parking, despite being promised as the centerpiece of good urban infill?

    Also, if I-94 traffic lanes were properly priced (a price based on ensuring adequate speed, also known as congestion pricing) there wouldn’t be traffic during rush hour or during game rushes.

    In general, I’m glad the city and the developer realize the automobile is a horribly subsidized, space-inefficient, and ineffective way to move droves of people to events such as this in the middle of a well-connected, urban neighborhood. I just hope they are able to avoid building all this “temporary” surface parking.

  5. Submitted by Tom Goldstein on 06/07/2016 - 05:12 pm.

    Sadly, the AUAR is a joke. Although the document is presented as a highly technical study, it is nothing more than guesswork based on untested assumptions such as “event manager experience” rather than fan surveys, experiences with the current soccer facility in Blaine, or even the demographics of existing MU fans

    Instead, the “study” simply estimates the capacity for LRT, BRT, and shuttles, then concludes people will use these other modes of transit because they exist. What’s missing is the “why?”, as in why would someone drive up to the State Fairgrounds, wait 20-30 minutes for a shuttle to the stadium, wait another 20-30 minutes (or even up to an hour, according to the study) to take a shuttle back to the State Fairgrounds–when they could park right within the neighborhoods adjacent to the stadium?

    Will the city ban event parking in the neighborhoods? If so, will that hurt attendance because people won’t want to deal with the hassle of waiting for shuttles and the time it takes to fight traffic to a remote site?

    And who’s going to pay for all those shuttle buses and extra LRT cars?

    The lack of genuine analysis in the AUAR raises far more questions than it answers. What it confirms is that a stadium will likely be built and “we’ll just figure out the traffic issues later.” Sounds like a plan.

    • Submitted by Matthew Steele on 06/08/2016 - 09:08 am.

      What’s the big deal

      If people park in the adjacent residential neighborhoods? Residents are not entitled to street parking more than anyone else.

      Hey, at least Midway won’t get infested with more big boxes like a Home Depot…

    • Submitted by Allan Wilson on 06/08/2016 - 03:43 pm.


      This is supposed to take the place of an Environmental Impact Study, which may “wander” into forbidden fruit, such as the expansion of Ayd Mill Road…

  6. Submitted by Harold Turnquist on 06/08/2016 - 09:11 am.

    Predetermined Conclusions

    Unfortunately many consultants used to study projects and/or their impact are simply hired guns whose job is to validate a predetermined conclusion. Given the problems this AUAR does identify it can be safely assumed that the reality will be far worse. The City has consistently downplayed the impact of the stadium on the neighborhood and on people working or passing through the area. The problems are not going away and if this White Elephant is built it will severely impact the quality of life for Midway residents.

  7. Submitted by Allan Wilson on 06/08/2016 - 04:05 pm.

    Saint Paul: Development Approval Process

    The discussion on this board raises troubling questions which have plagued St. Paul for years: why are plans which routinely throw (reasonable) parking requirements to the winds rubber stamped?

    The Midway Center conterversy is but the latest in a string of fiascos dating back at least 30 years: a new development is planned and LITTLE OR NO provisions for parking are included. Lincoln Commons, Grand Avenue east of Lexington, 7th Street east of St. Clair, the new housing developments on University, I could go on and on.

    The reason “City Fathers”, and the lumpen Mayor Coleman is the worst, choose the Development at Any Price option is to cover a TREMENDOUS failure of theirs: the complete and utter collapse of downtown St. Paul as a viable. growing, energetic center for office employment. Downtown St. Paul as a business center is half of what it used to be 25 years ago, and it was not setting any records then. What is needed there is extensive remodeling and new construction, starting on removing the insane, suburban style “malling” of the former 7th Street. Saint Paul can live again, but first some people and things need to move on.

  8. Submitted by Don Mac Gregor on 06/08/2016 - 07:12 pm.


    Pub-to-pitch bus service.
    In Chicago, the Fire, the MLS team sponsors a bus service that picks up fans from designated bars, and takes them to and from Toyota Park for a $15.00 fee. (It may be higher.I haven’t ridden it in a while.)
    Granted, this would require support from Minnesota United, and perhaps some other corporate sponsor. (Heineken co-sponsors Chicago’s buses.) Bit I think it;s an option to explore, plus you get…over-served supporters off the roads.

  9. Submitted by Kevin Watterson on 06/08/2016 - 07:38 pm.

    Will enough people go thru this hassle to make the team and stadium viable in the long-term? Or, are there enough people who are 1) soccer fans, 2) inclined to attend games, 3) willing to go thru these transportation hassles?

Leave a Reply