Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


A divided Minnesota gets its wish: more divided state government

MinnPost photo by Briana Bierschbach
Gov. Mark Dayton: “I’m seriously concerned about the economic future of this state and nation.”

DFL Gov. Mark Dayton hoped voters would deliver him a Democratic-controlled Legislature on Election Night. Instead, they gave him the opposite, in a stunning Republican wave that swept outstate districts and exposed a deepening divide between urban and rural Minnesotans.

Dayton noted that Republicans only regained control of the state Senate by a single seat — pending two recounts. “We are a closely divided electorate,” he said.

House Republicans, standing outside their St. Paul office building Wednesday afternoon, offered a different take on the election: that Minnesotans spoke loud and clear in wanting a change from Dayton and Democratic policies on things like the economy and healthcare. “We not only maintained our majority, we grew our majority,” Republican House Speaker Kurt Daudt said, flanked by new Republicans legislators in his now 76-member caucus.

Whatever Minnesota voters intended on election night, what they ended up with is more divided government. Dayton is serving out his final two years in the governor’s office with a 76-57 Republican-controlled House (pending a February special election) and 34-33 GOP-led Senate (pending two senate recounts). And if Wednesday morning’s dueling press conferences are any indication, it’s going to be another two years of dead-end meetings, open letters and lots of gridlock.

Peace and harmony? Not so much

One of the more immediate issues is a possible special session to deal with the rising costs of premiums under the state’s health insurance exchange. But on Wednesday, Dayton and Daudt disagreed about whether tax cuts, bonding and transportation spending should be taken up as part of a special session, too. Dayton threw cold water on a broader agenda for the session, saying he was concerned about the state and nation’s economic future under a Trump administration. “I’m not going to agree to a tax bill that’s based on last spring’s forecast,” Dayton said. “I’m seriously concerned about the economic future of this state and nation.”

But Daudt said the governor was going back on his word to fix problems with a bipartisan tax bill, which he vetoed at the end of last session over a drafting error that would’ve cost the state $100 over the next three years. “Gov. Dayton is going to be held accountable to the words and the promises and the commitments he made to Minnesotans,” he said. 

House Speaker Kurt Daudt
MinnPost photo by Briana Bierschbach
House Speaker Kurt Daudt

Facing a Republican-controlled Legislature is not a totally unfamiliar position for the governor, of course: Republicans held both the House and the Senate during his first two years in office. In 2011, budget negotiations with Republicans ended in a historic, 20-day government shutdown. He raised the specter of another government shutdown next year, though he said he’d like to work with Republicans to find common ground.

“There are stark differences between those two groups of Minnesotans and the people who have been elected to represent them, including myself,” Dayton said. “It’s going to be unrealistic for Minnesotans to send a group of people that closely divided and have very deep differences and expect it’s all going to be peace and harmony. It’s not.”

Neither Dayton nor Daudt suggested their agendas will change much over the next two years. For the governor, that means continuing to push his universal pre-school proposal, which Republican legislators have repeatedly rebuffed. He also wants to pass major clean water initiatives in his final two years in office, but Republicans and farmers have pushed back, specifically on his proposal to create natural buffer zones to protect lakes and streams from agricultural runoff across the state. 

As long as there’s a surplus, Daudt said they will continue to push for a tax-cut bill, a proposal that failed last year under Dayton’s veto pen. Daudt also suggested he wants to see the state’s health insurance exchange MNsure eliminated and the system set back to the “way things were before.”

What about the Senate? 

The big unknown factor is what direction the new Senate Republican majority will take. They were mostly silent on Wednesday, after the caucus’ leader, David Hann, lost his Eden Prairie Senate seat in an upset. The Senate minority caucus is meeting Thursday morning to elect a new leader to take them into the majority.

Celebrate MinnPost’s 9th
Anniversary at the Cowles

You won’t want to miss this post-election discussion with Sen. Al Franken and political scientist Norm Ornstein. Get tickets today!

“Voters want Republicans to stop the government overreach that happened under DFL control, and give them back power to make decisions about their own lives,” Hann said in a brief statement. “They want us to fix the healthcare crisis. They want government to live within its means and stop spending money wastefully.” 

If there is one broad area of common ground coming out of Tuesday’s election, it could be evening the economic playing field for Minnesotans. “‘Make America Great Again,’ it’s a very effective slogan,” said Dayton, reflecting on why Trump resonated with so many Minnesotan voters. “We all want American to be great again. I think America is great now, but it needs improvement for a lot of people who felt that their lives were not as good as they were a decade ago, in terms of their economic stability.”

Comments (6)

  1. Submitted by Tom Anderson on 11/10/2016 - 07:04 pm.

    Nothing new here

    “Dayton said. “I’m seriously concerned about the economic future of this state and nation.””

    The Governor insisted on growing the “rainy day fund” as a hedge against an upcoming recession (and I agree). Even though he now wants to spend that money on the health insurance fiasco, the reasoning that a recession is coming is still sound even though there won’t be a President Clinton to inherit it.

  2. Submitted by Pat Berg since 2011 on 11/11/2016 - 10:07 am.


    “a drafting error that would’ve cost the state $100 over the next three years.”

    Isn’t that supposed to be $100 MILLION?

    • Submitted by Tom Anderson on 11/11/2016 - 08:16 pm.

      You are correct

      $100 million that would have cost the State/been saved by taxpayers over the next three years. $30 million per year, or one tenth of the amount the Governor wants to use to bail out the MNsure debacle in one year. Ouch!

  3. Submitted by Bob Petersen on 11/11/2016 - 12:24 pm.

    Of course…

    Dayton wants DFL control. So he can continue to govern with less effort and get his way. He has signed things into law without even knowing what he has signed, continues to want to throw money away, continues to blame others for everything bad, and has a hissy fit when something doesn’t go his way.

    • Submitted by Dave Paulson on 11/13/2016 - 05:26 pm.

      content free comment

      This type commenting is not worthy of the site.
      It is all opinionated, partisan hyperbole. Plenty of that at any other site.

  4. Submitted by John Ferman on 11/13/2016 - 09:31 am.


    When the ACA passed the States had the option to do the Exchanges their way instead of the federal exchange way. Not Washington Here resonated throughout the legislature. In addition an ‘enhanced’ Medicare was offered. It had a name that I have forgotten and it was tied to having a state exchange. When Daudt repeals MNSure he will be increasing every retired persons health care costs. I would hope the news expeets would do deeper analysis on what Minnesotans stand to lose.

Leave a Reply