Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.

Donate

Odd years out? In both Minneapolis and St. Paul, new efforts seek to move municipal elections to even years

MinnPost file photo by Karl Pearson-Cater
Voter turnout in odd years tends to be much lower than the turnout in even years. That is especially true during presidential elections.

Two separate efforts, one in Minneapolis and one in St. Paul, are seeking to have voters move municipal elections in both cities from their current odd-year schedule to even years, when turnout is higher.

In Minneapolis, the issue is being pushed by Barry Clegg, the chair of the city charter commission, who wants the commission to consider putting the issue before voters, perhaps in 2018. In St. Paul, Peter Butler — a former city budget office staffer and current management consultant — is again circulating petitions in the hopes of putting it on the ballot this year.

The two cities are using different methods for putting the issue before voters, but the efforts have a similar rationale: Voter turnout in odd years tends to be much lower than the turnout in even years. That is especially true during presidential elections.

Numbers from the city clerk shows the average turnout in city elections since 2001 has been 31 percent of registered voters, says Clegg. During years when there is a gubernatorial election, as there is in 2018, the turnout jumps to an average of 59 percent. And in presidential years, voter participation has averaged 75 percent. 

The numbers in St Paul show a similar difference. Over the last eight city elections, the average voter turnout has been 25 percent of registered voters, though there were higher numbers in the two years with contested mayoral races: 2001 and 2005. The numbers are significantly higher in even-year elections, however: 44 percent in 2010; 66 percent in 2012; 40 percent in 2014; and 61 percent in 2016.

Based on the turnout difference alone, Clegg said he thinks “the question quickly becomes not whether we should switch to even years but what’s the best year to do it.”

Butler agrees: “Why even bother with odd-year elections if no one turns out?”

But the turnout number is not their only concern. Both make the case that city elections are decided by an electorate that is not just smaller, but whiter, older and wealthier than each cities’ overall population.

Butler cites 2013 and 2016 turnout data in St. Paul to show that the largest participation in municipal elections there come from the generally well-off wards 3 (covering Highland Park and much of the Macalester-Groveland neighborhood) and 4 (Merriam Park, St. Anthony Park, Hamline-Midway, Como and Mac-Groveland) with the 1st and 2nd next. Badly trailing are voters in the northern Ward 5 and the northeast and eastern wards 6 and 7. But the wards that do not have high levels of participation in city elections have much better turnout when a presidential election led the ballot. 

Less attention on local issues

Both Clegg and Butler acknowledge the arguments for reserving odd-year elections for city and school board elections. Doing so allows local candidates and issues to avoid competing with the attention given presidential, gubernatorial, congressional and legislative campaigns. It is easier to get attention and raise money when local issues stand alone, proponents say.

Barry Clegg
Barry Clegg

Without agreeing, Clegg said the turnout differences make the argument unconvincing to him. “When less noise means less participation by a factor of half, that’s too high a price to pay, I think,” he said.

Both also acknowledge that voters who turn out for presidential elections may not always make it all the way down the ballot to local government and school races, a phenomenon sometimes dubbed “ballot fatigue.”

Butler looked at the 2016 St. Paul ballot, where a school board race was on the ballot due to a resignation. While 140,210 people voted for a presidential candidate in St. Paul, 92,906 voted in the school race, only 66 percent of the presidential total.

In Minneapolis, elections for the Minneapolis Public Schools Board of Education are always held in even years. In 2016, the school board candidates attracted the votes of 73 percent of voters who cast presidential ballots. Yet even the lower vote numbers are significantly higher than the expected turnout had the elections been held in odd years. 

The wildcard: RCV

Minneapolis and St. Paul provide a complication that other state cities don’t face: ranked choice voting. By moving elections to even years, election officials would have to produce two sets of ballots  — or a single ballot that contains both traditional voting for one set of candidates and ranked choice voting for others.

Such ballots have been produced in other states, Clegg said, though not yet in Minnesota. Clegg said his commission is not interested in revisiting ranked choice in Minneapolis and instead will look for technical and legal solutions to combining the two types of voting. In St. Paul, there has been talk by the charter commission about putting ranked choice voting in front of voters again, but no formal action has been taken.

Minneapolis adopted ranked choice voting as a charter amendment in 2006 by an almost two-to-one margin. “And 2006 to 2017 is an eye-blink in charter time,” Clegg said.

Added Butler: “You can’t let administrative and technical considerations dictate how you’ll run elections.”

Another question: which cycle? 

The Minneapolis Charter Review Committee will meet Wednesday to discuss the issue. If a decision is made to move ahead, public hearings will be scheduled. But since the next Minneapolis city elections won’t be held until 2021, the commission has time to work through the legal and technical issues that might come up.

One question is whether to shift city elections to even years with the gubernatorial election or even years with the presidential election.  “If high turnout is the goal, the presidential year is the gold standard,” Clegg said. 

If the commission wants to sync municipal voting with presidential elections, it would require the removal of just nine words from the charter. Currently, city elections are to be held in “the year after a year divisible by four.” Removing the words “the year after” in the three times it is used would move elections to presidential years: that is, those divisible by four.

Clegg said he prefers that a citywide vote on the issue be held in 2018, rather than this year — because, well, 2018 would have a much higher turnout. If voters decide to make the change, council and mayoral terms would have to through an adjustment to either shorten them by a year or extend them by a year to mesh with the new election date.

In St. Paul, Butler is trying to place the matter before voters by petition, which requires valid signatures totaling 5 percent of the turnout of the last election. He began last year and collected around 3,600 signatures, short of the 4,400 he needed. He is allowed to carry those signatures over to this year, but since the most recent election is now the higher-turnout 2016 presidential contest, the number of signatures needed has increased to 7,011.

It is mostly a solo effort, though Butler said he has gotten help from some Macalester College students. His deadline for submitting signatures to Ramsey County is July 11.

Comments (5)

  1. Submitted by Fredric Markus on 05/02/2017 - 01:20 pm.

    Fredric Markus

    One might hope that an even-year system would help bring greater stability to the municipal precinct caucuses that have not prospered lately, at least in the inner-city wards of Minneapolis. Twice now, once in 2013 and now again in 2017, the partisan fury emerging from the Ward 6 experience has made a mockery of due process, not the least brought about by poorly prepared and feckless officials presumably governing these sometimes violent circuses.

    This time around the west bank meeting venue again had to be vacated. Rescue squads had to be called in four times to deal with medical emergencies. This connotes neither rhyme nor reason IMHO.

    Parenthetically, one might also recall that Sanders was warmly endorsed in every congressional district in Minnesota’s DFL caucuses yet other than Congressman Ellison, the entire DFL leadership of the state lined up behind Hillary Clinton in patent disregard of thousands of informed opinions to the contrary. This too makes a mockery of the presumed intent of that party’s endorsement procedures.

    Fred Markus
    Minneapolis

    • Submitted by Pat Terry on 05/02/2017 - 02:09 pm.

      Backwards

      The fact that elected officials lined up behind a candidate that did not win the caucuses is actually further evidence of what an undemocratic sham caucuses are. Indeed, the presidential caucuses were so bogus, the legislature promptly eliminated them. Caucuses disenfranchise people and cannot be justified.

      • Submitted by Eric Ferguson on 05/04/2017 - 01:47 am.

        only the presidential ballot

        Caucuses are no sham, but they are a horrible way place to put a presidential primary and have it run by volunteers. Caucuses aren’t made for that. They do work well for the other things they do. Caucus states tend to have stronger grassroots parties. I lived in a non-caucus state. and you can be excused for wondering if there even IS a local party, let alone who runs it or what it does.

    • Submitted by Eric Ferguson on 05/04/2017 - 01:43 am.

      Your argument is actually backwards

      That caucuses could produce a different result than what anyone in leadership might want (the claim the leadership lined up behind Hillary before she secured the nomination is just false, but that’s a separate issue) shows that caucuses are just as grassroots as they’re claimed to be.

      The problems in ward 6 show that the caucus structure that works in the rest of the state is a problem in Minneapolis, because we get much more turnout than caucuses are made for. We get turnout that’s on the scale of a convention, not the neighborhood meeting the caucus is intended to be. That’s not going to change by changing the year of local elections. Moving the local elections at least means fewer caucuses to organize, so Minneapolis DFLers are likely to support the idea.

  2. Submitted by Ed Day on 05/02/2017 - 10:34 pm.

    Another advantage of even-year elections is that they will provide a better platform for city and school board candidates to explain the how state and federal policy affects local decisions.

Leave a Reply