Skip to Content

Support MinnPost

St. Paul’s LED test illuminates the complexity of light itself

Photo by Bill Lindeke
“The new light has changed the character of the neighborhood at night,” said Gary, a Lex-Ham resident, during a meeting last winter. “There’s light intrusion in people’s homes, and a fixture on the opposite side of the street that’s also blasting into my house so that when evening comes, the shade goes down.”

The paradox of infrastructure is that when it’s truly working well, it’s invisible. We take our most reliable systems for granted — things like tap water, a smooth road, or a flushing toilet. We only really notice these elaborate systems when they break, when the toilet clogs or the bridge falls down. Suddenly, the background appears in sharp focus.

Nothing reveals the infrastructure paradox better than lighting itself, the thing that we rely on to see the world. Right now, an opportunity to witness the backdrop of urban infrastructure is wrapping up in a quiet St. Paul neighborhood where, for the last few months, the city has been gathering input about LED streetlights. The test emerged from a unique collision of historic preservation, technological change, and governmental efficiency that, perhaps for the first time, forced neighbors to examine the light around them. 

The Lex-Ham streetlight mystery

For almost 10 years now, St. Paul has been installing LED light bulbs into city light fixtures at every chance they get. The reasoning is simple: LED light bulbs are at least 20 percent more efficient and last longer than older lights, saving millions of dollars over the long term. So far, the staff has installed more than 6,000 of the new bulbs around the city during construction and rehab projects; during that time, they received few complaints about the new light.

Photo by Bill Lindeke
A lamp post mid-replacement.

But everything changed last fall when the city refurbished streetlights in the tight-knit Lexington-Hamline neighborhood. 

“The new light has changed the character of the neighborhood at night,” said Gary, a Lex-Ham resident, during a meeting last winter. “There’s light intrusion in people’s homes, and a fixture on the opposite side of the street that’s also blasting into my house so that when evening comes, the shade goes down.”

Gary was not alone. Dozens of his neighbors had been so upset by the new lights that they made significant changes to their homes: writing their council member, buying new window shades, and even moving bedrooms away from the street.

At a packed meeting at in the Central High School library last winter, city staff, including Public Works Director Kathy Lantry, Deputy Mayor Kristin Beckmann, and Council Member Dai Thao, were on hand to take the measure of neighborhood concerns. For the upset neighbors, the issue boiled down to three key points: aesthetics, health, and community. For example, many people brought up a 2016 AMA study that points to harmful effects of more “blue” or “white” light on people’s health.

“When the lights came one, everyone sitting on the porch would groan and turn away,” one woman testified. “We’d all have to move our chairs, and we’re front-porch people. So what are the city’s options if we stick with an LED light?”

In the end, one key idea emerged. For urban neighborhoods like Lex-Ham, where many of the streets are designed around sidewalk interactions, driving people away from their windows and porches can have a detrimental effect on public safety and the social life of the street. This is particularly noticeable in neighborhoods like Lex-Ham, with stronger social ties.

“We have always had a block party active,” Diana Scimeca, who lives off Dunlap Street, told me last month. “On our block it’s always gone late into the night, but the minute the lights came on, we said, ‘We can’t sit out here. It’s just horrible, it’s blinding.”

St. Paul streetlight explainer

A key part of the problem is that not all lampposts are made equal. To the keen eye, there are dozens of differences.

Photos by Bill Lindeke
St. Paul has long been proud of its distinctive lampposts.

One of St. Paul’s unique charms is its manmade canopy of human-scale lamps that line nearly every street. The city has long been proud of its distinctive lampposts, sturdy metal fluted poles topped with historic hexagonal lanterns, and if you wander the streets of St. Paul and begin to notice them, the posts come in a surprising array of styles. 

The thing that made Lex-Ham’s LEDs upgrades different is that not all St. Paul lampposts are alike. Most of the streetlights that received LED light upgrades in the first years of the city's rollout were not historic vintage lamps. Instead, the new bulbs had been put into “cobra head” fixtures (a pole curving over the street with a bulging bulb at the end) or “globe lights” (self-explanatory) in the downtown core.  Neither of these styles have the lighting dynamics of the city’s more classic model.

Even when the city began installing LEDs in the city’s distinctive “classic” street lamps, there were still a bunch of subtle differences. Most of the old-fashioned-looking lampposts in the city are actually modern retro replacements — new fixtures designed to look like the old ones. But a few neighborhoods, like Summit Avenue, Irvine Park and Lex-Ham, kept their original vintage lamp fixtures, many of which are almost a century old.

“In replica lanterns, the way that the diode directs light is not straight out, like into houses,” explained Christine Boulware, an historic preservation expert who happens to live in Lex-Ham, and attended last fall’s meeting. “With these historic lanterns that our neighborhood fought very hard to keep, the direction of light is more into people's homes than lights on Montreal [Avenue] or Ford Parkway.”

(Fun fact: The Lex-Ham Community Council proudly boasts that it's the oldest community council in the city. It got started back in the 1970s organizing around an effort to save their historic lampposts.)

In Lex-Ham, the tiny details between the lampposts ended up making a big difference in the street.

Deep inside history of street lighting

It turns out that the history of urban street lighting is secretly fascinating, and once you open up Pandora’s light bulb, a complex world appears. The first wide-scale urban lighting in St. Paul were gas lamps, installed in the late 19th century beginning in upscale neighborhoods. (For example, the old “island station” power plant that was torn down in the river valley a few years ago was originally called Saint Paul Gas & Light Company, beginning as a gas supplier before moving to coal-fired electricity.) Since the shift to municipal electricity, lights have been constantly evolving in the name of efficiency and safety.

According to Kathy Lantry, who heads the city’s Public Works department, there are some older city staff members who remember all the way back to when the city switched to HPS lighting in the first place starting in the late '80s, gradually replacing the (whiter) mercury vapor lamps.

“There are people in Public Works who have been there a long time,” Lantry explained at the winter meeting. “When we went from old mercury lights that were really bright to the HPS we have now. Back then, a lot of people thought that everybody looked jaundiced. So part of this is very different color light, and managing that change.”

And the issues do not stop with color. Here’s a sample of some more lighting terminology: “Color temperature” refers to the precise temperature and spectrum at which the light shines, measured in degrees on the Kelvin scale; “wattage” refers to how much energy it consumes; and “intensity” refers to its brightness, measured in lumens from various distances.

(There’s also “voltage,” but to be honest, this is over my head. LED works at a much lower voltage than HPS, for what it’s worth.)

Each kind of technology and bulb has specific properties along these different spectra, and where it becomes problematic is that, while LED does very well in terms of having a low wattage and high lumens, its default color temperature is a “white” light around 4,000ºK. High-pressure sodium vapor lighting, on the other hand, ranges around 2,000 to 2,300ºK. That color temperature gives it a distinctive — I find it pallid — yellowish hue.

“[In 2008,] the only readily available hues were 5K and 4K,” explained City Lighting Engineer John McNamara last fall. “The year we decided on 4K was when we did the downtown globe lights. 4K is neutral light, and part of reason we chose it is it's closest to color-neutral light. It was readily available at the lowest temperature that we felt appropriate.”

Years later, the 4,000K bulbs do not seem to be rubbing people the right way. After the outcry, the city discontinued the bulb replacement and began a lighting test this spring. Engineers chose three neighborhoods on the East Side and central St. Paul, and installed eight kinds of LED bulbs, many of which were new models that have appeared on the market. Some of the bulbs burn at different color temperatures, or have different shapes. Neighbors were invited to send feedback to the city about which they liked and disliked.

Photos by Bill Lindeke
Subtle differences between old and new lamp enclosures in nearby Merriam Park.

The test ended last week, but so far the results are mixed.

According to Amy Gundermann, the director of the Lex-Ham Community Council, many people remain unhappy with their options.

“Neighbors have told me that they are disappointed in all of the options,” Gundermann explained this week. “Of the eight bulbs tested in Lex-Ham, four are still 4000K bulbs, which is the Kelvin level of the LED bulb installed last year. It seemed unnecessary to test those bulbs in light of the AMA report and resident reaction. I hope the results of the surveys are helpful to Public Works in determining a lighting solution that is both efficient and livable. Our city is safer when people enjoy their front yards.”

Still, designing lighting that works for the entire city is a staggering task when you have more than 37,000 light bulbs hanging over city streets. Engineers are very reluctant to adopt what they call "a piecemeal approach", where each neighborhood has a different kind of bulb. For logistical reasons, they would prefer to have a single bulb that works for everyone. But with the diversity of lampposts, environments, and urban design details, that might prove to be an impossible challenge.

For her part, Diana Scimeca has low grades for the new light bulbs.

“There are two that are just a pitch more yellow, a lower kelvin,” Scimeca said. “They’re better on a relative scale — they’re like a 2 for livability as opposed to a 1 — but they’re still not yellow enough or shielded enough. It’s a little frustrating.”

Scimeca hopes St. Paul has a bright idea up its sleeve that will bring back her nighttime block parties. Meanwhile, the test bulbs are still up in Lex-Ham and the other neighborhoods. If you're curious about subtle distinctions of LED technology, check them out for yourself. It’s an enlightening experience.

Get MinnPost's top stories in your inbox

Related Tags:

About the Author:

Comments (10)

As a resident

…of the "other" Twin City, I don't have a dog in this fight, but, over the past year, I've replaced all the CFL bulbs in my house with LEDs, and yes, the difference between 4K light and 2,700K light is quite noticeable. So much so, that I've installed LED-compatible dimmer switches in the rooms with the 4K lighting and kept the light level to just-barely-above-minimum. On the other hand, since it doesn't have the yellowish cast of incandescent or early CFL bulbs, I like the fact that colors are rendered more accurately, at least to my eye.

What I notice from the photos in the article, however, is that much of the neighborhood concern is over an issue that's self-inflicted. One fairly obvious way to deal with what's perceived as glare coming in the window or onto the front porch is to convert the street lights to "down" lights, which not only help the "dark skies" issue and help make stars visible again at night, but also diminish or, in some cases, even eliminate that whole having-to-put-shades-on-the-windows-at-night thing. True, such a solution would not preserve the Victorian aura that many seem to find "historic" or "authentic," but since street lights themselves don't go back much more than a century-and-a-half, I don't attach too much weight to that view, and I was a history teacher for a long time.

If aesthetics are the prime concern, it's useful to remember that public art (and street light designs could easily be viewed in that context) is frequently contentious. What some of the people in the Lex-Ham neighborhood prefer may not be what other residents of the same neighborhood like best, or what people in other St. Paul neighborhoods would prefer, and the Public Works desire to standardize is rational and sensible, or should be to people who like to keep their city tax bills from increasing any more than necessary. Instead of the Victorian-styled lamp that shoots light outward in every direction, rather than downward, I would personally prefer modern downlighting, and even directional downlighting that manipulates the light so that it generally covers only certain designated areas. My neighborhood in Minneapolis is old enough to have the "Cobra" lights on telephone poles, which have their own issues with color and light spillover, and are the antithesis of the focused downlighting in the previous sentence.

Here In the Capitol City

Whether illuminated by gas light, mercury vapor or LED, we like to refer to the "other" Twin City as our first suburb.

The East Side neighborhood that is mentioned is south of E. Maryland Avenue and east of Earl street.

Work lighting

The company where I work is replacing conventional lighting with LEDs, and they either didn't ask or don't care, because in the retrofitted areas, the light temperature is VERY cool and blue-looking. It's really jarring to go from one work area with softer lighting into another area with this harsh blue-white light, and I can't help wondering about effects such as eyestrain and overall stress.

This rush-to-LED to save money is all very well and good, but I'm afraid that all too often those with decision-making authority haven't necessarily done a very good job of thinking through ALL the consequences beyond cost alone when looking into what choices are available.

Modify the lights in place.

I'm a photographer who works with lighting and color temperature all the time, and there's a simple solution to this: create a semi-opaque paper or plastic baffle that surrounds the light bulb. (Essentially a softbox.) This baffle can be any color you like, changing the character of the light even though the bulb itself remains neutral. That way you can have distinct baffles for different lantern types/neighborhoods while keeping the bulbs universal.

Since LEDs run cold, fitting them into the fixtures safely shouldn't be a problem.

LED

1. I don't know why public agencies are so quick to put in 4000K LEDs. I'd much rather see 2700-3000K. There's also evidence that lower color temperatures helps preserve some nightvision, allowing for easier transition between lit and unlit areas.

2. I can't believe - in 2017 - that we are installing non-dark-sky fixtures. There are plenty of "historic" fixtures that don't waste money lighting up the undersides of airplanes and birds. My Minneapolis neighborhoods have some newer faux-acorns which are full cutoff fixtures. Another benefit is less glare, which significantly improves visibility. Glare from direct light source can actually reduce visibility immediately around the light source.

3. There are excellent lighting articles on streets.mn from Reuben Collins, Monte Castleman, and others. We are lucky to have such a local community of streetlighting nerds (I'm in this camp too).
https://streets.mn/2014/07/02/street-lights-from-my-neighborhood/
https://streets.mn/2016/07/15/the-overhead-streetlights-of-local-streets...

They literally cannot replace

The sodium bulbs fast enough for my liking. After decades I can finally see again at night. Don't know why, but those orange things have literally made nightime look like fogged glass for as long as I can remember. I recall how much brighter things seemed in the old (presumably mercury) streetlamp outside my home as a child, things finally look that way again.

It's not that complicated

Tim Cooper beat me to it- but how has no one else thought of the most obvious solution? Put colored/tinted baffles around the bulbs, or tint the glass on the fixtures themselves with a spray-on or adhesive film. Both the brightness and color temperature can be easily tailored this way. Has anyone on that "committee" heard of tinted windows, frosted glass or sunglasses? Same principle.

As he also mentioned, LEDs produce almost no heat (hence, their efficiency) so that wouldn't be an issue. There's absolutely no need to replace the entire fixtures OR continue searching for one bulb that pleases everyone.

Sheesh...

There's now a new solution @2200K LED

2200K LED street lights are now available (>110lm/W). That is the same color temperature as HPS lights that we have had for 60+ years without problems.

The problem with bright white LED lights (>3000K) is that the amount of blue in them cause harm to humans, flora, and fauna. The American Medical Association has determined the issues such as Melatonin reduction, increase in obesity, breast cancer and so on. https://www.ama-assn.org/ama-adopts-guidance-reduce-harm-high-intensity-...

To really choose the right luminaire, the following has to be taken into consideration:
Percentage of blue light
MSI - Melatonin suppression index
IPI - Induced photosynthesis index
SLI - Star light index
BUG rating (Backlight, Uplight, Glare)
We can no longer make decisions for our communities ignoring the harmful side effects. More info streetlightsca@gmail.com

I am pleased at ....

least one responder brought up light pollution issue. Years ago I did some reading that demonstrated an interesting historical parallel to the first wide use of streetlighting and room lighting to be electrically generated by an large industrial entity and an "overnight" (my words) increase in what the standard for "adequate" lighting should be. Coincidence maybe. But some questions must be asked, how much lighting to too much ? And how well does lighting actually deter crime ? These questions need actual data as we march further into to the 24/7 light world.

subjective

It's all totally subjective; if people don't like the lighting, it's bad lighting. But there will always be some for whom the supposed "deterrence" factor is all that matters. And once that card is played it's hard for reason to prevail.

I doubt there's any hard, credible evidence for a straight-line relationship between lighting intensity and crime deterrence. Seems to me that people sitting on their porches, or looking out their windows, are the best deterrent of all, and obnoxious lighting discourages these things.