Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


Should Minneapolis have an acting police chief for a while or a permanent appointee right away?

MinnPost photo by Peter Callaghan
Acting Chief Medaria Arradondo taking questions from the media following Tuesday's Executive Committee meeting.

Should Minneapolis live with an acting police chief until next year when a new City Council and perhaps a new mayor take office? Such a path would allow for a broad search for a chief, opening the job to outsiders not ingrained in department history and culture.

Or would the city benefit from a permanent appointee with the authority to continue fulfilling a reform agenda?

Mayor Betsy Hodges has come down strongly on the side of making acting Chief Medaria Arradondo the permanent head of the department and made it formal Tuesday by nominating him at the city’s Executive Committee.

“I certainly saw the measure of his leadership in the last few weeks as we dealt with such a tragic incident in the city of Minneapolis,” Hodges said Tuesday in reference to the police killing of Justine Damond. She refers to the man most call by the nickname “Rondo” as a “Minneapolis kid” who graduated from Roosevelt High School.

At a press conference Monday, Hodges was asked why she doesn’t wait for a new council to propose making Arradondo’s nomination permanent? She said she had “deep and complete confidence” in him. A national search might make sense only if she didn’t have such confidence. But she also said she thinks the city and the department need stability.

“We have asked a lot of the department in the last few years, there has been a lot of change,” Hodges said. “To be sure who the leader is moving forward in this department at this time is important for the community, but it’s also important for the officers.”

Under the city charter, Hodges can only nominate a chief. If the Executive Committee chooses not to forward it to the full council, she must nominate someone else. While the full 13-member council will decide whether to appoint Arradondo, likely at its Aug. 18 meeting, the four council members on the executive committee made it clear they agree with Hodges. A unanimous vote of committee members who cover a wide swath of council and city political beliefs advanced the nomination.

Whether to wait or whether to move ahead now was on their minds.

“I think it’s important to call that out here,” said Council Vice President Elizabeth Glidden. “We have a partial term left — about 17 months — we are in an election year.” Glidden is the only member of the council not running for an additional term, and Hodges is in the midst of a competitive re-election campaign.

“Essentially what that means is if we did decide that doing a search was the right thing to do, potentially that means a significant amount of time to go through that process,” Glidden said. “That is time that I’m very concerned about losing, especially when there is someone like acting Chief Arradondo who is here, who is embedded in the community and who is ready to do the work.”

Glidden said that the practical differences between the two paths would be minor. A national search could take up to a year. At most, an appointed Arradondo would serve just five months longer than that before needing to be renominated or replaced.

“I actually believe we will be doing something of great value for the next council, appointing the chief for the remainder of the term,” said Council Member Cam Gordon, who identifies with the Green Party and is the council’s lone non-DFLer. He said the next council will have a chance to weigh in on police leadership after this chief term ends in January 2019.

While process was discussed Tuesday, so were council opinions of Arradondo’s qualifications. The 28-year department veteran is well known to council members through his leadership roles, including 1st Precinct inspector and most recently as Janeé Harteau’s chief of staff and deputy chief.

In the later role, Arradondo — known as “Rondo” — took a lead in the implementation of the body worn camera project and was the department’s liaison with the federal National Initiative for Building Community Trust and Justice. He was recently thrust into the public realm again after the police killing of Justine Damond, representing the department until Harteau returned from vacation. It was shortly after her return to the city that Hodges asked for and received Harteau’s resignation.

“I have always been impressed by his character, by his openness and by his approach to the work of public safety but centering that within community,” Glidden said.

Gordon said Arradondo jumped in when the council member wanted the city to examine having professionals respond with police officers when subjects of police dispatches could have mental health problems. And Council President Barbara Johnson said she was pleased that Arradondo was willing to take the job.

“This is an especially challenging time for public safety professionals, for the community, and I do appreciate your willingness because I think it does come from a love of the city and a love of the people here and a love of the police department,” Johnson said.

Mayor Betsy Hodges nominated Medaria Arradondo
MinnPost photo by Peter Callaghan
Mayor Betsy Hodges nominated Medaria Arradondo at the city’s Executive Committee on Tuesday.

In addition to the four who supported the appointment Tuesday, two other council members stood behind Hodges at a Monday press conference in which she formally announced her decision. They are John Quincy and Lisa Bender. It will take seven votes to appoint him to the job permanently.

At that Monday press conference, Arradondo laid out his vision of the department — one that would build on Harteau’s own reform agenda she dubbed “MPD 2.0.”

“The greatest currency of value that we have with our community is trust,” Arradondo said. “Each and every day our officers must go out there and earn that trust one contact at a time.

“Over the past several years the Minneapolis Police Department as well as police departments all across the country have certainly been scrutinized, there have certainly been areas of our community where the trust has been shaken,” he said. “I am committed to being sure that when history is written, we are on the right side of history.”


The Minneapolis city charter takes an unusual path toward nomination and appointment of department heads, with special consideration for the chief of police. Under the system, mayors make appointments that first must be approved by the executive committee. That committee is chaired by the mayor and includes the council president and three other council members.

Unless all council members are of the same political party — an unofficial designation since they run on a nonpartisan ballot — the minority party must be represented. In the case of the current council, Gordon must be a member. The others are Council President Johnson, Council Vice President Glidden and Council Member Kevin Reich.

If approved by the full council, chiefs serve a three-year term and can be removed from office by the council only for cause. Another twist in the charter is that, unlike that of other department heads, the chief’s term is three years — which means it doesn’t line up with a mayor’s four-year term. Hodges, therefore, inherited Harteau, who was appointed by her predecessor, R.T. Rybak. Hodges reappointed her in the midst of her own first term as mayor. And the next mayor — Hodges or a challenger — will serve a year of a term before having a voice in who runs the police department.

The public hearing on the nomination will be Aug. 9 at 1:30 p.m. before the council’s Public Safety, Civil Rights and Emergency Management Committee. If approved by that committee, the nomination will likely go before the full council, first at the Committee of the Whole on Aug. 16 and then for final action at the council meeting on Aug. 18.

Comments (3)

  1. Submitted by Meredith Anderson on 08/02/2017 - 10:39 am.


    and not having a national search will save the city hundreds of thousands of dollars.

  2. Submitted by Pat McGee on 08/02/2017 - 11:18 am.

    Lame Ducks

    Every council member and the mayor is a lame duck at this point. If they want to weigh in long term on a search for a chief they should focus on getting re-elected first. Then see how Rondo does before launching an expensive and lengthy search. The City of St. Louis expects their search for a new police chief to take nine months.

  3. Submitted by Michael Quinn on 08/06/2017 - 06:34 am.

    Minneapolis Police Chief

    As a lifelong resident of Minneapolis and a former police sergeant with the Minneapolis Police Department I have a vested interest in who becomes the next chief. Rondo would have been my first choice. I don’t often agree with Mayor Hodges. I live in her former ward and I have been really frustrated by her term as mayor and her choice to keep our media star chief, Harteau, in place. I have done expert witness work for several years on issues that include deadly force, police use of force, data privacy, policy and workplace harassment.

    My experience is that Chief Harteau’s failure to adequately supervise Internal Affairs, following Chief Dolan’s lead, has led to Internal Affairs becoming a gatekeeper that prevents real accountability within the department. By way of example, The 2013 report from the Office of Police Conduct Review found “The Review Panel has issued 17 recommendations since it began operation, finding merit on approximately 16% of allegations. While the chief did not disagree with the merit recommendations issued by the Review Panel, all merit recommendations were on allegations where the reckoning period expired, except those contained in the pending cases. Hence, the chief was unable to issue discipline on the allegations.”

    I was an internal affairs investigator for 2 1/2 years. Only in extreme cases is there any reason for an internal affairs case to take more than 90 days, if they are actually investigated.

    Rondo has always put the community first and his first move, to fix the body camera policy without consulting the federation, was just what I expected from him. Now let’s see what his next move will be. I expect that he will establish real accountability for officers who don’t abide by the new camera policy and that he will tackle the very real problem of the few officers who are costing the city millions of dollars in law suits. Lastly, I also expect that he will be butting heads with Lt. Bob Kroll on a regular basis and that the federation president will have a lot less influence on policy and procedure than he has had in the past. I hope I’m right.

    Bottom line – don’t waste my tax money on a search before we give Rondo a chance.

Leave a Reply