Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


The Minnesota Nurses Association wants to have a big say in who the next governor is

Courtesy of the Minnesota Nurses Association
Mary Turner speaking to striking nurses on Sept. 19, 2016, as state Sen. Scott Dibble and state Rep. Raymond Dehn look on.

In June, hundreds of people packed the Minneapolis City Hall chambers and hallway for the chance to speak at a hearing about raising the city’s minimum wage from the state-mandated $9.50 to $15 an hour. 

Mary Turner was one of the people signed up to speak, but with testimony scheduled to stretch from midafternoon late into the evening, she knew she needed to make her two minutes count. So Turner, a registered ICU nurse at North Memorial Medical Center in Robbinsdale, decided to focus her comments on the health-care side of the debate. 

“Night after night we see people coming into the emergency room because they have inadequate housing, inadequate food,” she said in her remarks advocating for raising the wage. “This is a public health crisis.”

Turner was at the hearing as more than your average nurse. She came as the president of the Minnesota Nurses Association, the union that represents 22,000 registered nurses across the state. 

For decades, the union has weighed in on issues that directly affected those members: staffing, safety, flexibility in the workplace. Until recently, though, it wasn’t necessarily common to see nurses advocating for issues that weren’t directly tied to health care.

That’s changed. Under new leadership, the nurses — often in their signature red T-shirts — have become a highly visible force in the Capitol’s corridors and city halls throughout Minnesota, arguing that good jobs, wages and a quality of life play an important role in public health. They’ve advocated for things like a higher minimum wage in Minneapolis and St. Paul, changes to immigration policy and paid sick leave, and pushed back on efforts to pass legislation to pre-empt local governments from passing their own ordinances. 

They are also hoping to play a big role in elections. They’ve endorsed a diverse slate of municipal candidates in Duluth, St. Paul and Minneapolis this fall, and expect to be a player in the wide-open 2018 governor’s race, for which they’ve already stepped in to back their preferred candidate. 

“They have continued to expand that part of their work reaching outside of that wall of direct provision of care to things that are the foundation of health, whether it’s access to a good job, tax policy, racial disparities, climate change and how these things impact public health,” said Erin Murphy, who served as executive director of the MNA before becoming a state representative and who’s now running for governor. “And they have moved along significantly in flexing their muscle in elections.”

A tumultuous history

As Turner likes to point out, organizing among Minnesota nurses is nothing new. In the early 1900s, nurses worked under poor and dangerous conditions, and without standardized schooling and a code of ethics, people were practicing nursing who didn’t have proper training to treat patients. So in 1905, more than 100 nurses from Minneapolis and St. Paul met and crafted the first-ever statewide nurses registry, a code of ethics and organized under the banner of the Minnesota State Graduate Nurses’ Association.

When nursing schools started popping up, the group secured the first law for the registration and licensing of nurses. As the decades went by, the group grew and reorganized as the MNA, which often focused on addressing persistent issues over working conditions and job security.

In the early ’80s, nurses said they were being forced into layoffs and part-time work without adequate protection from hospitals. So at 6:30 a.m. on June 1, 1984, 6,000 nurses at 15 Twin Cities-area hospitals walked off the job. The largest strike of its kind in the nation at the time, the walkout affected about half the hospital beds in the metro, and the dispute stretched on for 38 days. Finally, after an 18-hour negotiating session, an agreement was ratified between the nurses and the hospitals. A new contract would take seniority into account with layoffs and result in higher salaries for the nurses.

The breadth of that strike was surpassed in 2010, when 12,000 Twin Cities nurses walked off the job at Twin Cities hospitals for one day to protest the lack of strict nurse-to-patient ratios, an idea that was rejected by hospitals as inflexible and unnecessary.

‘We can’t sit on the sidelines’

It was around this time — during the 2010 contract negotiations with Twin Cities hospitals — when Turner first got involved in the political side of the union.

Raised in a Republican family in New Hope, Turner hadn’t initially been a particularly active member of the MNA; she felt that her views wouldn’t necessarily be represented in the Democratic-leaning union. (There are about 101,000 people in the state with a nursing license, but not all are practicing or work directly with patients.)

But Turner had been drifting from the GOP for a few years, and she was concerned with what she saw as the widespread “corporatization” of health care across the state. Smaller hospitals were being bought up by big hospital companies, and staffs were being cut back. During the nurses’ 2010 contract negotiations with hospitals, the union managed to fend off cuts to nurse pensions, but hospitals won on salary increases, and the issue of staff-to-patient ratio was left unaddressed.

“That consolidation thing is going on big time and the feeling is that as nurses we are on some kind of assembly line with our patients,” Turner said. “That factory model is not conducive with bedside nursing. When you get people that are trying to run a health-care company and they have their MBA but they have no concept about the human side of it? It just doesn’t jive.”

MNA members joined activists at a Minneapolis fast food restaurant
MinnPost photo by Peter Callaghan
MNA members joined activists at a Minneapolis fast food restaurant on Sept. 12, 2016, prior to a march for a higher minimum wage ordinance.

After the negotiations, Turned dove into the organization, especially the political side of the union, first by running and winning a spot on the MNA’s board of directors. She then moved on to the government relations team, which is how she first got involved in issues at the Capitol. 

Turner, who still works late-night shifts at North Memorial Hospital’s level one trauma unit, saw a need for nurses to get involved in issues that went beyond the bedside — to address the reasons patients had to go to the hospital in the first place: from access to health care and earning sufficient wages to immigration status.

So when she was elected president of the MNA in 2015, she decided to make a shift in the group’s priorities.

“I was born and raised Republican, but now I’m a union leader,” Turner said. “As far health care is concerned, none of that matters. I realized we can’t sit on the sidelines.”

Wanting a say in elections

Nurses aren’t strangers to political battles, of course. The MNA was one of the first provider organizations to push for MinnesotaCare in the early 2000s, a state health-care program that covers low-income Minnesotans, mostly in rural parts of the state. And in 2015, MNA members filled the Capitol to push for a bill to establish a safe patient standard, which aimed to set minimum staffing requirements for nurses, regardless of the size of the facility. 

Staffing levels and workplace safety are still some of the top priorities for the organization, but under Turner’s leadership, the MNA has been particularly active at the Capitol on a broad range of issues. Last session, it pushed back on efforts from the Republican-controlled Legislature to pass a pre-emption bill, which would have blocked local governments from passing their own paid leave and minimum wage laws.

The group has also been active at the city level, in part, Turner said, because there was so much gridlock in state and federal politics. 

Still, the decision to step out on issues like a $15 minimum wage and earned sick and safe time hasn’t been without pushback from some members. “Some do say, ‘Oh all these social justice issues, you’ve got to stick to just the bedside, ‘” Turner said. “The first thing I point out is that in our 112-year history, who do you think was out on the streets for women’s right to vote, child labor laws. Who were the women? It was the nurses and the teachers. We were right there at the beginning in terms of social justice issues.” 

That approach has also made the union members players in elections across the state. In Minneapolis alone, the MNA has endorsed a politically diverse slate of candidates for City Council, from a Socialist Alternative, Ginger Jentzen, in Ward 3 to the sitting council president, Barbara Johnson, in Ward 4. They’ve also endorsed Dai Thao for mayor in St. Paul and Raymond Dehn for mayor in Minneapolis. 

They’ve also waded in early in the 2018 Minnesota governor’s race, throwing their support behind DFLer Murphy, who is running against five other Democrats for the party’s backing. By all accounts, their screening process was intense, set up like a speed dating round with four different panels of nurses, where all six DFL candidates (Republican and Independence Party candidates were invited too) for governor had to answer the same set of questions.

“Some of them hated it,” laughed Shannon Cunningham, director of governmental and community relations for the MNA. “I know they did because they told me they did.”

For the union, one of the single biggest issues in city and state races is single-payer health care, something that — though it’s become a hot topic since the last election — has always been one of the organization’s top priorities. “That was one of the nurses’ core beliefs, that people have a right to health care,” Murphy said. “That is rooted in justice and a philosophy that health care is not just a business but also something people need when they are sick.”

In the governor’s race, where health care could be a huge issue, the nurses are hoping to play a big role in driving the debate. For the last three election cycles, MNA has raised and spent more than $450,000 to support its endorsed candidates, mostly collected through union dues. This cycle, the group wants to more actively raise money from members specifically for their political activities, Cunningham said.

“We always have pushed it as an issue, but two or three ago you wouldn’t have found [candidates] standing on a pedestal talking about how we need single-payer medicine,” Cunningham said. “The litmus test from our board was there was no way we can endorse a candidate in this election for governor who doesn’t support single-payer, and we are going to keep talking about that as a top issue.”

Comments (9)

  1. Submitted by Pat Terry on 10/25/2017 - 11:33 am.


    I know a couple of nurses who were part of the Allina strike, in which they got absolutely hosed. It will take years to make back what they lost. They were especially frustrated by the focus on bigger issues – like the pipe dream of single payer – and other issues completely unrelated to their jobs, while the members were blowing through their savings. They were both ready to cross the picket lines by the time it ended. Whether that feeling was more widespread, I don’t know.

    I’m a union supporter, but a union has to look after its members first. I read this story and am reminded of what a lousy union the MNA is.

  2. Submitted by Geoff Tobiasson on 10/25/2017 - 12:42 pm.

    Time to Start Connecting the Dots People

    Not a nurse but married to one. Unions, all unions, need to include social justice into their platforms. That means issues like Single-Payer Healthcare, without which, hospitals will continue being responsible for providing healthcare to Americans that have no insurance. It stands to reason that if they suffer losses there, they will look to other areas to generate cost savings, like nurses salaries. Global Warming is also putting greater pressure on the healthcare industry. As the poorest, uninsured Americans become injured by greater and more numerous natural disasters, who do you think is on the front line? Where are those unrecoverable expenses going made up?

    We ALL need to start understanding the FACT that we depend on each other in a myriad of different ways. If we don’t start stepping back, seeing the big picture and connecting the dots between our needs and those of our neighbors, we are in for some bad times.

  3. Submitted by Joe Smith on 10/25/2017 - 03:10 pm.

    When I have a question about aspirin or

    Advil I will ask a nurse, when I want to vote, not so much,!! If you want the unions to lose more support encourage folks from the pipe fitters union to give political advice. Believe it or not there are enough folks living in the Mid West who are conservative and nurses that this “one size fits all” liberal speech turns them off. That is how the Dems lost 1,000 sears, both Houses, 34 Governorships and many State houses since 2008, please keep it up.

  4. Submitted by John Webster on 10/25/2017 - 03:41 pm.

    Inconvenient Facts

    As of August, 2015, the average annual RN income in Canada was $51,000; in America the average RN income was $70,000 (both in U.S. dollars). That’s what happens in all single-payer systems – reimbursements to providers are far less than in America, and doctors and nurses therefore earn much less.

    The MNA now favors what are in effect open borders immigration policies. Lax enforcement of immigration laws has resulted in hundreds of thousands of building tradespeople being displaced or having their hourly wages reduced by 30+%. How about we allow the unlimited immigration of qualified RNs from all over the world so that health care costs can be reduced after RN incomes are reduced? I don’t favor doing that, but if you’re pro-open borders for all other jobs, why should nursing be an exception?

    • Submitted by Pat Terry on 10/25/2017 - 05:17 pm.


      John, a couple of weeks ago you made similar claims about building tradepeople and immigration and I asked you if you had any information or could link to something that would back up your claims. I didn’t see any response. Can you provide anything now?

    • Submitted by Greg Laden on 10/29/2017 - 07:55 am.

      Inconvenient fact II

      The cist if living in Canada is between 4 and 31% higher than the US depending on what region or area of economy.

      Benefits and working conditions in Canadian health care are better than for the US

      At the lower end, Canadian nurses make about $1 an hour less than US nurses, while at the higher end, Canadian nurses get about $2 more.

  5. Submitted by Eileen Weber on 10/25/2017 - 11:15 pm.

    MNA’s correct emphasis on health

    Nurses don’t just work in hospitals. As the largest healthcare profession and the most trusted profession in society, proven by years of Gallup polling, nurses are rightly focused on the major determinants of health. As a wealth of data shows, health is primarily determined by food, environment, housing, behavior, income, structural racism, etc. So MNA’s focus on these issues is absolutely consistent with its members’ professional concerns about health.

    Correction to Ms. Bierschbach’s story: MinnesotaCare was enacted in 1992, not the early 2000’s as reported in the article. However, Bierschbach correctly notes that MNA was instrumental in its passage, demonstrating its policy sophistication and influence 25 years ago as well as today. Its leaders, including Representative Murphy, stood by Governor Arne Carlson’s side as he signed the landmark legislation into law.

  6. Submitted by Greg Laden on 10/29/2017 - 07:47 am.

    Are you now or have you ever been a nurse?

    Good for the nurses, and good for the unions.

    But the nurses’ union did the expected, endorsing one of their own. I think most agree that Auditor Otto’s full on revision of our health insurance system is the best plan (The Healthy Minnesota plan).

    Anyway, go nurses! And I hope Murphy finds an important place in the Otto State House.

Leave a Reply