Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


What the latest independent expenditure reports tell us about Minneapolis’ mayor and council races

MinnPost photo by Corey Anderson
Samples of independent committee literature trying to influence this fall's city elections.

After three months of guessing and speculation, Minneapolis residents finally got a look this week at the inside workings of a handful of independent committees trying to influence this fall’s city elections.

The biggest surprises?

  • Minneapolis Works! — formed by downtown business interests to defend City Council incumbents and back several challengers — raised no money from “corporate PACs,” as some people had claimed. But it did get well over half of its money from a single person, one well known in Democratic money circles.

  • The statewide business PAC most vilified by Democrats — Minnesota Jobs Coalition — has not yet given to Minneapolis Works! But it did provide half of the funds for Save Our #1 Parks, a committee formed by several outgoing Park Board members.

  • A PAC chaired by Stonewall DFL chair Del Jenkins raised $153,000 — far more than Minneapolis Works! — with money coming  from unions as well as business people Robert Pohlad and Kelly Doran.

The revelations came from the most recent campaign finance reports, which were due Tuesday, though some were still trickling in as of Wednesday. The reports cover the period from Aug. 1 to Oct. 26. And while they give a look inside the efforts of independent committees, they do not cover the critical final two weeks of the campaign, which means that any conclusions about what a given group has or hasn’t done — or who has or hasn’t contributed to them — must be followed by the words “so far.”

For example, the report shows that, contrary to rumors and fears, there was no corporate money thrown into the Minneapolis Works! campaign to support four City Council incumbents, two challengers and one open-seat candidate … so far. It also shows that the Minnesota Jobs Coalition, the much-despised statewide political committee that has worked to switch the state Legislature from Democrat to Republican, has not given money to that same campaign … so far.

Concerns about the Jobs Coalition getting involved in city elections in Minneapolis originated not from the candidates targeted by Minneapolis Works! but from the committee’s founders. Developer Steve Minn told potential donors they could write checks to either “MN Jobs Coalition Legislative Fund” or a personal check to Minneapolis Works! Another message from Minneapolis Chamber President Jonathan Weinhagen asked for money to “one of our committees Minneapolis Works! Or the Minnesota Jobs Coalition Legislative fund.”

If the Jobs Coalition is doing any mailings on its own, they haven’t shown up in mailboxes yet. The organization will not have to report on its activities until it has to submit its next report to the state, on Jan. 31.

However, the money Minneapolis Works! did report also provided some surprises. The committee raised $99,902 in the three-month period, bringing it a total of $111,902. The money came heavily from downtown business people, and most heavily from developers and real estate interests. There is also money from two unions — Laborers District Council and Engineers Local 49. The largest amount, however, came from a single source — James Lawrence, who gave the committee $60,000. Lawrence was a big donor to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and had looked into being a DFL candidate for Congress. His wife, Mary G. Lawrence, was briefly a DFL candidate for the congressional seat vacated last year by John Kline before stepping aside in deference to Angie Craig.

The Lawrences, donors to Jacob Frey’s mayoral campaign, also funded another committee earlier in this election cycle with a $25,000 contribution. Hear Our Voices Political Committee hired four Somali-American political consultants in March and April.

Minneapolis Works! has been active in seven wards, with mailings that are both promotional for the candidates they support and critical of rivals. The group also spent $26,500 for “polling/consulting/research” with the 1858 Group in St. Paul. The president of that group is Mark Drake, the former head of the Minnesota Jobs Coalition.

This report might have helped partly insulate Minneapolis Works! from accusations of being what critics say is a right-wing Republican PAC, at least for the time being. Any additional contributions that would change that narrative won’t be reported until long after the election is over.

But in what was a surprise, the Minnesota Jobs Coalition did give money to another city independent expenditure committee: Save Our #1 Parks. The group was formed by outgoing members of the Parks Board and is backing its own slate of candidates in opposition to a slate put forward by Our Revolution, the political group that spun out of the Bernie Sanders presidential campaign. Save Our #1 Parks is also backing at-large candidate Mike Derus and District 6 candidate Bob Fine.

Half of the committee’s $30,700 came from the Jobs Coalition, and it took another incumbent who is seeking re-election — and who was endorsed by Our Revolution — to point out that the Jobs Coalition isn’t exactly a friend of city parks. Brad Bourn tweeted out a photo of an old mailing used to defeat two northern Minnesota DFL legislators, Joe Radinovich and John Ward. The mailing accused the two of being too close to Minneapolis liberals, citing as evidence their support for “$8 million on a sculpture garden in Minneapolis ….” The money raised by Save Our #1 Parks so far has been spent on advertising in community newspapers.

MinnPost photo by Corey Anderson

While much attention has been paid to Minneapolis Works!, another committee quietly outraised the business-oriented PAC. Fresh Start Minneapolis reported collecting $153,000, with most of that money, $122,000, going to a Washington, D.C., political consultant, Field Strategies, for “canvass.” Pro-Jacob Frey literature sponsored by Fresh Start has been delivered to homes around the city.

Of the money Fresh Start Minneapolis raised, $50,000 came from the public employee union AFSCME Council 5 and another $50,000 came from Laborers District Council of Minnesota and North Dakota. Additional money came from the Minneapolis Fire Fighters, the state Sheet Metal workers, the Minneapolis Building and Construction Trades Council and Teamsters Joint Council 32.

Another union has funded the committee Minneapolis Forward. SEIU HealthCare and SEIU Local 26 pooled $28,000, money that has been spent almost exclusively on social media ads. The committee is working for the re-election of Mayor Betsy Hodges.

Mayoral candidate Tom Hoch is the potential beneficiary of Let’s Do Better Minneapolis. The committee raised $13,350 from individual donors. Of that, $7,000 has been spent with the Maccabee Group of Bethesda, Maryland, an online marketing agency that works primarily with businesses and nonprofits.

Yet another committee, Friends of the Warehouse District — formed by restaurant industry owners and workers who advocated for a tip credit in the city minimum wage ordinance — showed $9,100 in contributions and $9,000 in expenditures, all for Comcast outdoor advertising. Based on its Facebook page, the committee is pushing the candidacies of Hoch for mayor, Tim Bildsoe for City Council in Ward 3, and Blong Yang for the council in Ward 5.

Comments (7)

  1. Submitted by Bill Kahn on 11/02/2017 - 11:27 am.

    Thanks for doing my homework. I always dread this part of democracy in America as it consumes more time than most have, but Heck, it is free speech and there’s not a darn thing we can do about it barring a constitutional convention for some reasonable amendments to get that time back and the money out of politics.

  2. Submitted by Ray Schoch on 11/02/2017 - 01:44 pm.

    I’m with Mr. Kahn

    It’s always a bit depressing to see how much money is apparently necessary to run for, and get elected to, even relatively minor public positions like city council representatives, park board representatives, and the like. I’d like to use the phrase “special interest money,” and just did, actually, but the truth is that most of us are “special interest groups” of one, or maybe a few others in my or your particular family. The scale is different from being a Fortune 500 corporate donor, but the activity and motivation are pretty much the same: self-interest. Madison thought “factions” would cancel each other out, to the benefit of democracy and the society as a whole. I’m more skeptical than our 4th President, but we’re not going to be changing systems for this election, and I have a fair idea of how it all works at the moment, so I try to just go with the flow, and analyze it later.

  3. Submitted by Don Casey on 11/02/2017 - 01:53 pm.


    As an outstate resident, I admit to paying little attention to Minneapolis city politics. But as a retired journalist, I am curious why, in this piece, the writer chose to identify one PAC (Minnesota Jobs Coalition) as “much-despised.” I don’t see similar characterizations for other organizations or individuals mentioned.

    In another piece a couple of days ago (curiosity prompted a quick check) the same writer described Minnesota Jobs Coalition simply as a “business PAC … known for backing Republican legislative candidates.” What earned so much spite — worthy of being singled out — in so short a time?

  4. Submitted by Don Casey on 11/02/2017 - 02:43 pm.


    As an outstate resident, I admittedly pay little attention to Minneapolis city politics. But as a retired
    journalist, I’m curious about the description of the Minnesota Jobs Coalition as being “much-despised.” I don’t see any similar characterizations (“positive” or “negative”) of other organizations or individuals mentioned. My curiosity prompted a quick check. Two days ago, the same writer described the Minnesota Jobs Coalition simply as a “state business PAC …. known for backing Republican legislative candidates.” What transpired to earn so much spite so quickly? Is the organization “much” despised — or just by Democratic legislative candidates? On that basis, PACs supporting Democratic candiates are “despised” by Republicans. Does that make them also “much-despised”?

    • Submitted by Bill Kahn on 11/02/2017 - 07:45 pm.

      Would seem to have more to do with where the money comes from than what it is spent on: all the big conservative suppliers of dark money, usual suspects like the Koch brothers, Walls, and others we DFLers and others who care about big money in politics typically find odious. The MN Jobs Coalition normally just stokes the hatred of the DFL outstate.

      Although I am offended by Our Revolution taking over the Minneapolis DFL city convention and the loss of balance and experience in the candidates endorsed, the MN Jobs Coalition money bugs me too, although one could just shrug and call it fungible, i.e., I don’t like the DFL endorsed MPRB endorsees, so welcome the Save Our #1 Parks committee actions wherever their funding comes from.

      This is not saying I like even thinking about this garbage.

  5. Submitted by Robin Mellsworth on 11/02/2017 - 09:42 pm.

    Just the Facts

    I don’t need the editorial comments. A spreadsheet would have made this information easier to grasp.

    Unions, especially those representing City employees, are special interest groups.

    • Submitted by Bill Kahn on 11/03/2017 - 12:55 pm.

      Just go to Hennepin County election finance pages on their site to download and read them instead of giving us your own unneeded “editorial comments.”

Leave a Reply