UCare generously supports MinnPost’s Second Opinion coverage; learn why.

Children born to older dads at greater risk of mental illness and academic problems, study finds

Children born to older dads at greater risk of mental illness
The children of the older fathers are also at greater risk for academic struggles.

Children born to men who are middle-aged or older are at greater risk of having a neurological or psychiatric problem and of doing poorly at school than those born to younger men, a new study reports.

Specifically, the study found that compared with children fathered by men aged 20 to 24 years old, children born to dads who were 45 or older were 3.5 times more likely to have autism, 13 times more likely to have attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and 25 times more likely to have bipolar disorder. In addition, their risk of developing a substance abuse problem was more than double and their risk of suicide almost triple that of children born to the younger dads.

The children of the older fathers also were at greater risk for academic struggles. They were 60 percent more likely to fail a grade in school and 70 percent more like to drop out of school before graduating than the children born to the younger dads.

The findings were published Thursday in JAMA Psychiatry.

A large and comprehensive study

Earlier research has reported an association between advancing paternal age and children with an increased risk of neurological and psychiatric problems, including autism, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, as well as intellectual and academic problems. But those studies have tended to compare younger fathers and their children to different older fathers and their kids.

This current study, which analyzed detailed birth and medical data for 2.6 million people born to 1.4 million men in Sweden between 1973 and 2001, included in its analysis a comparison of the mental health and academic history of siblings born to the same father.

The authors of the study also controlled for a long list of independent factors that might account for increased mental health and academic problems, including the mother’s age at the child’s birth (children born to older mothers are at increased risk for many of these same neurological and psychiatric disorders), the birth order of the child (oldest, youngest or somewhere in the middle), and any history among the parents of psychiatric hospitalizations or criminal convictions.

But the findings held.

Gene mutations may be a factor

In an e-mail exchange Thursday with MinnPost, Brian D’Onofrio, the study’s lead author and a professor of psychology and brain sciences at Indiana University, said the difference in risk among siblings born to the same father at different ages was the finding that most surprised him.

“We compared offspring born when a father was younger to their sibling when the father was older,” he wrote. “We did not expect that the magnitude of the associations between advancing paternal age at childbearing and offspring problems would be larger.”

D’Onofrio and his co-authors say that any increased risks due to advancing paternal age are probably caused by spontaneous genetic errors known as de novo mutations. A 2012 study reported that the rate of de novo mutations appears to double in men’s sperm every 16.5 years. Most of these mutations are innocuous, but some have been linked to neurological and psychiatric disorders, including autism and schizophrenia.

Absolute risk is still low

Of course, this was an observational study, which means it can show only an association between two things, not a cause-and-effect. Other factors within families that might have an influence on a child’s psychological development — ones not identified in the study — may explain the findings.

Also, the study’s results reflect relative risks, not absolute ones. As one expert explained to New York Times reporter Benedict Carey:

[T]he overall prevalence of autism is 0.5 percent to 1 percent of the population, depending on the estimate and the location. But for the children of healthy parents in their 20s, the rate is perhaps one in 300, or even lower. A threefold increase would put the odds at about one in 100, still very low. The same goes for the risk of psychosis. The baseline rate is tiny for the children of young, healthy parents, and remains quite low even when doubled.

D’Onofrio agrees. “We’re not saying that all offspring born to older fathers will have psychiatric or educational problems,” he wrote to MinnPost. “In fact, an overwhelming majority of offspring born to older men will not have major psychiatric or academic problems. Rather, the study found that advancing paternal age at childbearing is associated with greater risk for serious problems in offspring that are associated with great impairment.”

“The study adds to a growing body of research that suggests families, doctors and society as a whole must consider both the pros and cons of delaying childbearing,” he added.

You’ll find an abstract of the study at the JAMA Psychiatry website.

Comments (2)

  1. Submitted by jody rooney on 02/28/2014 - 12:19 pm.

    Take that you trophy wives!

    That’s the first think I thought when I read the headlines, but as the author points out low risk is still low risk.

  2. Submitted by Steve Titterud on 02/28/2014 - 02:50 pm.

    “doctors…must consider both the pros and cons…”

    …not only “of delaying childbearing”, but also of their penchant for clinging to pet theories at the price of excluding other possible causes.

    Case in point, from the article: “D’Onofrio and his co-authors say that any increased risks due to advancing paternal age are probably caused by spontaneous genetic errors…”.

    WHY are these the probable cause ? What evidence is there ? Are there no other candidates ? Are they the only thing that changes in men as they age ? How many OTHER associations are there, besides this one ? Why did the authors think it appropriate to pick their favorite cause to quote ?

    Sheesh !!

Leave a Reply