Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


It’s time U.S. Hockey Hall of Fame inducts its first woman

Cammi Granato
Cammi Granato

The International Ice Hockey Federation, the worldwide governing body for the sport, will be inducting the first class of women into its Hall of Fame in May. Two of the three inductees are Canadians, but one is an American — two-time Olympian Cammi Granato, who starred on the 1998 U.S. team that won gold in the first Olympic women’s tournament.   

Granato’s selection is intriguing because neither she nor any other American women are yet enshrined in the U.S. Hockey Hall of Fame in Eveleth, Minn. The larger and better-known Hockey Hall of Fame in Toronto remains all-male, too. Eighteen years after the first sanctioned women’s world championship, what are they waiting for?

10th anniversary of Nagano gold appropriate time 
On the 10th anniversary of Nagano gold, it’s time for the U.S. Hall to welcome its first women. You can help. USA Hockey will accept nominations until March 31, according to spokesman Dave Fischer. And you don’t have to be Lou Nanne or John Mayasich to nominate someone.

Here’s how easy this is: Go to the Hall’s website, download a nomination form, fill it out and send it in. The guidelines say you can nominate a player, coach or official who has been retired at least one year and made a “significant contribution” to hockey in the United States. (Sven or Ole from down the street buying 10 Derek Boogaard jerseys at the Wild team store doesn’t count.)

A committee of about a dozen people, which has yet to be appointed, will select the inductees, Fischer said.

Going into this week, the nomination pool included only two women — forward Cindy Curley, a Providence grad and a U.S. international standout in the early 1990s, and Laura Stamm, the longtime power skating instructor for the New York Islanders and other NHL teams. (Full disclosure: My nephew, who just finished his senior season at Cortland State in New York, took lessons from Stamm.)

Fischer expects somebody to nominate the entire ‘98 Olympic team. There is precedent; the U.S. Hall enshrined the 1960 and 1980 men’s Olympic gold medal-winners en masse. 

Conversations with several smart women’s hockey observers offered a few more candidates:

• The late Patty Kazmaier of Princeton, for whom the award for the best player in women’s college hockey is named. (Hobey Baker, the namesake of the men’s award, went in with the U.S. Hall’s inaugural class in 1973.)

Sue Ring-Jarvi, known as the grandmother of girls’ and women’s hockey in Minnesota. Through the efforts of Ring-Jarvi and others, Minnesota became the first state to recognize girls’ hockey as a varsity sport, in 1994.

Lauren Apollo, a University of New Hampshire product and a gritty national team defenseman in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

Karyn Bye, who led the ’98 Olympic team in Nagano with five goals in six games, and tied Granato and two others for the scoring lead with eight points.

Who should go in first?
Opinions vary on who should be first.

Former University of Minnesota coach Laura Halldorson offers a unique perspective. She played at Princeton with Kazmaier, and with Curley and Apollo on the earliest U.S. National teams. She coached against many of the ’98 Olympians, and five of her players later became Olympians themselves, including 2006 U.S. captain Krissy Wendell.

“I think you need the people who were in on the ground floor and did a lot back in the day,” Halldorson said. “Curley was the star at Providence before Cammi Granato was the star at Providence. Apollo was a big, strong defenseman in the mold of Patty Kazmaier, but better.” 

Apollo suggested inducting the 1987 national team that took bronze in the first women’s world championship tournament, an event the IIHF did not sanction until three years later. (Canada entered two teams, which won gold and silver.)

But three-time Olympian Angela Ruggiero, the 2004 Kazmaier Award winner who plays locally for the Minnesota Whitecaps, prefers a more contemporary, well-known first choice, for an intriguing reason — it might help more pioneers get in faster.

Ruggiero felt uncomfortable talking about this, fearing some might think she was disrespecting older players to pump the candidacy of the ’98 team, which she played on. But here’s her reasoning: She fears the selection committee might scatter so many votes among lesser-known pioneers that no single woman would be chosen.

Picking one big name or prominent team everybody knows, Ruggiero said, might ensure election this year. Once in, that woman or women could lobby more effectively for players from the earlier time.

“If it’s the first time a woman is going to get in, everyone knows about Cammi’s mark on the game,” Ruggiero said. “She’s got a lot of support. 

“Nothing against Patty Kazmaier or Cindy Curley or Karyn Bye and all the hockey greats — of course they deserve it. But if it’s the first time, the choice is going to have to be overwhelming. If they chose Cammi or the ’98 team, I think it would just help make it a lot easier to show why more women should be in.”

Tell us who the first women inducted should be

Now we’re interested in what you think. Post any thoughts or suggestions in the comments section below.

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (4)

  1. Submitted by B Maginnis on 03/18/2008 - 10:08 am.

    Cammi deserves it.

    She certainly played the game without sacrificing her feminine identity.

    Many male hockey fans appreciated that!

    The others, eh.

    Taking your game to the level of a typical Bantam B player does not a “Hall of Famer” make.

    But, then, that’s the problem when girls play men’s sports, and we have to pursue PC equality in things like Halls of Fame.

  2. Submitted by Mary O'Halloran on 03/22/2008 - 04:26 pm.

    I second everything that Bill said. If it wasn’t for the early pioneers laying the foundation for women in this sport then the younger players would not have had the opportunities that they did. The older players paved the road for the youger players. To disregard the accomplishments of the older players would be a disservice for the sport and women.

  3. Submitted by Bill MacMillan on 03/22/2008 - 11:54 am.

    I feel that, while not denigrating the latecomers, that the first inductees should be the early players. By their detirmination, drive and skill they were noticed andmade it possible for those who followed them to stand on their shoulders and become well known. The Hall of Fame of all sports is based on the exploits of the earlier players who made it possible for followers to shine.

  4. Submitted by CP Hilliker on 03/22/2008 - 06:35 am.

    No disrespect to Cammi who certainly is a fine player, or to BD who seems to think that femininity is paramount in the nomination process (what ARE you thinking posting comments like that???).
    Believe me BD, both Kazmaier and Apollo wold have creamed you like corn had you tried to get by either one of them on the ice so enough of the misogynistic BS – let’s just concentrate on nominating based on skills and contribution to the game. My vote goes to Apollo.

Leave a Reply