Nonprofit, nonpartisan journalism. Supported by readers.


Don’t break up the Wolves! Exhibit A: Chase Budinger

By grinding out a 107-98 victory over the Milwaukee Bucks on Wednesday night after a sloppy besting of a decimated Boston Celtics team on Monday, the Minnesota Timberwolves doubled their win total of the two previous Aprils just three days into the month. (They were a combined 1-19 in April 2011 and 2012.)

It was also the first time the Wolves have registered  consecutive triumphs since they beat Dallas for their fourth win a row way back on Dec. 15 — Ricky Rubio’s first game back from knee surgery.

That’s right. It has been nearly 13 months since Rubio was on the court for even this most-modest of winning streaks. If you’ve noticed how much he hates to lose, you can imagine how difficult that fallow period has been for him.

But not so much recently, eh?

Because for those few folks still paying attention, the Wolves have actually been playing some enjoyable hoops lately. They are 3-1 in their last four games, and 4-2 in their last six.

Consider their only losses in the last 10 days.

One was to a star-studded Lakers team desperate to make the playoffs, in which the Wolves were robbed by the officials of a chance to tie the game on what should have been three free throws for Rubio because of the last-second play that the NBA later conceded was a shooting foul by Kobe Bryant.

The other was the second night of a back-to-back, in which the Wolves were facing a rugged Grizzlies team and their talented frontcourt beef of Zach Randolph and Marc Gasol without the benefit of starting center Nikola Pekovic, sidelined with an ankle sprain. Even sans Pek, the Wolves kept it close — the score was tied with 10:29 left to play — before finally wearing out in the fourth quarter.

I regret being MIA myself these past two weeks, attending to the health needs of my father, who lives alone in Florida, without Internet, of course. But the absence has provided perspective, and strengthened my season-long contention that the Wolves front office needs to spend the money to retain Pekovic and Chase Budinger and persuade coach Rick Adelman to return for at least one season.

Even in the face of an incredible string of injuries, including the loss of superstar Kevin Love these past three months, the Wolves are poised to win 30 games in a season without Kevin Garnett for the first time in franchise history, and in the process make Adelman only the eighth coach in NBA history to capture 1,000 career victories.

With that relatively optimistic backdrop, let me begin my brief for keeping the current core of the Wolves roster intact. The rest of today’s column will be devoted to the advantages provided by fourth-year swingman and unrestricted free-agent-to-be Chase Budinger.

The beauty of Budinger

Most of the individual numbers are not kind to Budinger. He is shooting just 42.2 percent from the field, 30.6 percent from three-point range, and 78.8 percent from the free throw line — all well below his career norms. He is averaging fewer assists and more turnovers per minute than in any of his three previous seasons, and his rebounds per minute are the fewest since his rookie year.

That Budinger remains an invaluable on-court presence for the Wolves despite these sordid statistics is a tribute to how well his skill-set and style of play fit Adelman’s offensive schemes — and a reminder that a shooting guard who is 6-7 is likely to be a better defender than those who are 6-2 like Luke Ridnour or 5-10 like J.J. Barea.

Chase Budinger
REUTERS/Adam HungerChase Budinger

The conventional wisdom, voiced frequently after Bud emerged as a key figure in recent wins over Detroit and Oklahoma City, is that much of his value comes from the spacing he provides because of his reputation as a solid three-point shooter. That’s certainly true, but tells only part of the story.

Budinger is much more than just a catch-and-shoot scorer. His game involves fairly constant movement without the ball and, because of his size and athleticism, a reliable ability to finish at the rim. Consequently, not only does he cause opposing defenses to spread out when he is on the perimeter, but to react to his back cuts and curls around ball-screens. The spacing he provides is vast but also fluid, forcing adjustments, and thus sowing chaos for his opponents. 

How effective is Budinger? The Wolves outscore their opponents by a whopping 10.2 points per 100 possessions when he is on the court this season. That hefty advantage has been remarkably similar for the first six games of the season (when the Wolves went 4-2 before Bud tore ligaments in his knee) and for the past nine games (when the Wolves have gone 5-4 since his return).

Here’s the kicker: Budinger could be even more effective if Adelman played him with the starters more frequently. Because he isn’t that great as a dribbler, and because the coach stubbornly wants at least two capable ball-handlers on the court, he often subs in for Kirilenko at the small forward slot on the second unit. According to, the four players with whom he has logged the most minutes are, in order, Dante Cunningham, Barea, Alexey Shved, and Greg Stiemsma. But as anyone who watches the Wolves knows, the magic really happens when Bud meshes with the top talent on the roster as a shooting guard.

The sample size is small but still very compelling on this subject. Let’s take Bud and Pekovic together, for example, using numbers from Yes, with Budinger available on the perimeter, Pek can better wheel and deal inside — he is shooting 70.3 percent in the restricted area nearest to the hoop when Bud is in the game, compared with 62.1 percent when Bud is on the sidelines.

But even more dramatically, Pek’s ability to command a double-team, or demand that his man not leave him even during dribble-penetration and back-cutting by his teammates, is an elixir for Budinger’s inside game. Swap in Greg Stiemsma for Pek and Budinger shoots a wretched 36.8 percent (7 for 19) on shots in the restricted area. With Pek in the game, he is 7 for 9, or 77.8 percent. Add in his 5 for 5 when neither Pek nor Stiemsma are playing, and he is 36.8 percent with Stiemsma and  85.7 without him.

Or go to Bud’s pairing with Andrei Kirilenko. Because of his long tenure with coach Jerry Sloan in Utah, A.K. is well-versed in operating in a movement-oriented offense. So no one should be shocked that Budinger is shooting a gaudy 56.7 percent during his relatively scant 75 total minutes with AK on the court — or that Kirilenko has doled out 7 assists to Bud during that time, second on the team behind only Barea’s 8 assists to Budinger. (Of course J.J. had an extra 120 minutes with Bud, or 195 total thus far, to register that extra assist.)

Next up, Budinger with Ricky Rubio. First off, note that when Budinger shares the backcourt with Rubio, Ricky is not forced to guard the opposing shooting guard (Ridnour and Barea are frequently too small) and can use his defensive prowess on thwarting the architect of the opposing offense at the point. Rubio will also almost always draw the smaller backcourt defender when Budinger is at the other guard slot. It’s only a 60-minute sample — just five quarters’ worth of play together — but it is still hard not to notice that the Wolves register 11.2 more assists, 7.3 more steals and 8.1 fewer turnovers than their opponents per 100 possessions when Rubio and Budinger share the court.

The bottom line is that the Wolves are plus 14.4 points per 100 possessions in the 131:38 Pekovic and Budinger play together. They are plus 17.2 points per 100 possessions in the 74:31 Kirilenko and Budinger play together. And they are plus 19.2 points per 100 possessions in the 59:27 Rubio and Budinger play together.

Imagine the impact if Budinger had been healthy all season, and was knocking down shots at his normal career percentage. Imagine if he had spent even one minute this season sharing the hardwood with a pretty good player and fellow floor-spacer named Kevin Love.

Next column: Exhibit B — Nikola Pekovic

Comments (9)

  1. Submitted by Andy Grimsrud on 04/04/2013 - 11:12 am.

    But is Bud replaceable?


    I too have enjoyed the Return of Bud and the newly found floor spacing and improved player movement that has come with it. In a vacuum I would say that retaining Budinger is the smart — maybe even obvious play.

    But I’ll [sort of] play Devil’s Advocate. Tied to free agency decisions is the question of salary, and I don’t have a good feel for what Bud can command on the open market. If you take a quick look at upcoming free agents (list here: you’ll notice a rather long list of legitimate NBA wing players; guys with the size Luke and Barea lack and shooting ability on par with Budinger’s. (For those skipping the link, the list includes Korver, Redick, K. Martin, and others.)

    In this new CBA, I’d hate to see the Wolves overspend on Budinger if a roughly equal player of his type could be had at half the cost.

    I’m making an obvious point here that doesn’t really counter anything you wrote, but I think it’ll play a big factor in whether Budinger remains in Minnesota. Personally I’d be far-more concerned about keeping Pekovic, the more expensive but crucial asset, and worry a distant second about Chase — because his role is more easily filled via free agency this next summer and every one after that. (I guess that’s what your next post is about.)

    Great post and best wishes on your family situation.

  2. Submitted by Paul Brandon on 04/04/2013 - 02:37 pm.

    The mssing numbers:

    Budinger’s performance when playing against the -opponent’s- first team.

  3. Submitted by Mark Gisleson on 04/04/2013 - 05:16 pm.

    Glad you’re back

    and good luck with your dad. Your commentary has been missed and I hope you keep covering the Wolves next year.

    I’m sure you heard, but while you were in Florida Joan Niesen announced she’s moving to California, leaving you and, um, er — anyhow, it’s great to have you and your analysis back.

  4. Submitted by Greg Kerkvliet on 04/04/2013 - 05:54 pm.

    He’s one of my favorite role players in the NBA

    So much can be accomplished by being decisive, and his decisiveness makes him hard to guard. That game-winning layup early in the season vs. Indiana epitomized that. He’s really not a great 3 pt shooter (his career % is similar to Barea’s), but being able to the do the opposite of what the defense is playing him for makes him a unique threat.

    It bothers me at times watching him have to share the court with Shved and Barea, because the team doesn’t run sets when they’re paired as much as a loose drive-and-kick game that’s unpredictable in unproductive ways. Maybe some of that would be fixed with more court time together. As for him at shooting guard, it mainly works when paired with AK because AK facilitates well; it’s unclear to me whether it’d work as well with like Shawn Marion or Caron Butler.

    His future hinges so closely on Adelman’s status that it’s not clear what they should do yet. If a different coach doesn’t run sets that maximize his cutting ability, they’re better off with a defensive guy who can make corner 3s. He’s such a great fit for a passing/cutting offense that I wouldn’t want to watch him just spot up for 3-4 years under someone else.

    Family is important, and it’s good you’re able to be there when it matters.

Leave a Reply