The Wolves’ victory over the Bulls: a signature win — or an ephemeral outlier?

MinnPost photo by Craig Lassig
Coach Tom Thibodeau is renowned for being especially capable of enhancing team defense by instilling disciplined principles with relentless logic and attention to detail.

When the Minnesota Timberwolves beat the Chicago Bulls on Tuesday night, it felt like a significant, potentially resonant, victory.

The win interrupts a downward spiral that has been ugly enough to call into question the team’s psychological equilibrium, the balance and character of the roster, the players’ relationship with new coach Tom Thibodeau, and the ongoing wisdom of “staying the course” during a pivotal season of supposed maturation that seemed perilously close to going off the rails.

Thibodeau is renowned for being especially capable of enhancing team defense by instilling disciplined principles with relentless logic and attention to detail. He was awarded a five-year contract to be both head coach and president of basketball operations primarily because that quality seemed like such a good fit in molding the Wolves trio of burgeoning young talent, including cornerstones Karl-Anthony Towns and Andrew Wiggins and two-time slam dunk champion Zach LaVine.

But in losing three out of every four of their first 24 games, the Wolves not only displayed the careening inconsistency and lapses in concentration and composure that are hallmarks of youth; they regressed on the fundamentals of team defense that is destined to be the foundation of any future identity for a team guided by Thibs.

After yielding 105 points or more on just 7 occasions in their first 15 games, the Wolves let it happen nine times in a row — 8 of them losses. What made it worse was that these breakdowns began to happen most frequently in the fourth quarter. In the four games before going to Chicago, the Wolves had surrendered 33, 36, 35 and 38 points in the final period. This wasn’t a garbage-time trifle either — the Wolves led in two of those four contests and were within 8 points in another when the quarter started.

During the second half against Detroit last Friday, the Target Center crowd briefly booed the Wolves for the first time this season. Two nights later at home against Golden State, Minnesota blew a 10-point lead by ceding those 38 points — a season-high for an opponent — in the fourth quarter.

That set the stage for Tuesday in Chicago. It was a nationally televised contest mostly because it marked Thibodeau’s first return to the Windy City as an opposing head coach after leading the Bulls to the playoffs five straight seasons from 2010-15.

Midway through the first quarter, ESPN showed a clip of Towns saying the Wolves players knew how much this particular game meant to Thibs. Those words seemed damning because the Wolves were in the midst of playing their worst defense of this already sorry season.

It honestly felt like the players were pretending to enact Thibodeau’s principles, diligently going through the motions until the crucial follow-through that deterred the opponents. Players were scrambling back in transition, their eyes locked on the man they were guarding while seemingly keeping their distance as the action moved up the court.

They never closed out on the midrange shooters, nor put themselves in a position to defend the passes going to cutters heading from the wings and baseline toward the basket. They allowed Chicago’s big men to establish such an advantageous position in the low post that even subsequently contested shots were easily converted.

The Bulls sank 16 of 22 shots in the first period, matching the season high of 38 points yielded by the Wolves for a second straight quarter. Chicago scored on 12 of its first 14 possessions to begin the game, racing to a 26-6 lead after just seven minutes of play. The teams then played on mostly even terms, but only because the Wolves offense began to click. With 6:30 to play in the second quarter, the Bulls bumped their lead up to 21, with the game at 51-30, by hitting five shots in a row.

Then, inexplicably, the long-dormant Wolves defense began to gel. At first, the Bulls helped by missing some open looks. But the surge began almost immediately after Thibodeau brought his starters back in (LaVine was already on the court with the four reserves). Most noticeably, tandem big men Towns and Gorgui Dieng began rotating better and more aggressively to shut down points in the paint.

Another key improvement was transition defense, a horrendous weakness throughout the season. When the Wolves have functioned well at getting stops at all, it has usually stemmed from their offense generating enough made baskets that the team has time to prepare at the other end. But on Tuesday, the Wolves shot just 40.5 percent in the second half and still limited the Bulls to 31.8 percent accuracy.

Throw in the final 6:30 of the second period, when Chicago converted just two of 12 shots, and Minnesota allowed just 28.6 percent shooting over the final 30:30 minutes of the game. For just the second time this season, they triumphed despite scoring fewer than 100 points.

Through the fire

It is, of course, dangerous to assign too much weight to single contest over the course of an 82-game season, and especially to claim it as a potential bellwether of improvement for a squad that still ranks 27th in defensive rating (points allowed per possession) and at 7-18 holds the third-worst record in the NBA.

But there are reasons for optimism. The Wolves stiffened instead of wilting in the second half of a close game, and played taut defense for the final three quarters for the first time this season. They were led on defense by their starting unit, who had collectively been outperformed at that end of the court by the reserves thus far.

Furthermore, Saturday’s home game against Houston marks the end of what has arguably been the most brutal stretch in the schedule that Minnesota will encounter all season — 11 straight games against teams with winning records. By contrast, 10 of the next 11 opponents currently have losing records, although Atlanta (who they play twice in this span), Milwaukee and Portland are all just one game under .500.

Finally, coming back from more than 20 points down in Thibodeau’s heralded return to his old stomping grounds relieves some of the pressure that had been building around this team’s underachievement. There has been increasing speculation, by me and others, that the coach’s seemingly joyless dedication to discipline might be harshing the buzz by which his inherently carefree core of kids have been playing this game all their lives.

Put simply, Thibs keeps talking about “speeding up the process” of development. But what if his impatience and perpetual sideline haranguing was instead retarding it? Tuesday’s win lets some of the air out of that theory.

Over the next few weeks, we’ll learn whether the Chicago win marks a signature pivot, an ephemeral outlier, or something in-between for the Wolves fortunes over the rest of the season. But for Thibodeau, it is encouraging motivation to maintain business as usual. So let’s finish off by looking at one of the two most controversial aspects of his coaching thus far.

Too many minutes?

The knock on Thibs from his otherwise ballyhooed tenure with the Bulls was that he overplayed some of his key performers, such as Luol Deng and Joakim Noah, wearing them down and making them more susceptible to injury. This theory acquired greater currency when it was embraced by the Bulls front office in what became an unpleasant turf battle that eventually prompted Thibodeau’s exit — and his subsequent demand that he be given control over personnel matters as POBO along with his head coaching duties with the Wolves.

Sure enough, in his desire to fast forward the development of his core youth, Thibodeau is playing them often and together. LaVine (2nd), Wiggins (8th) and Towns (18th) all rank among the top 20 NBA players in minutes per-game. And collectively, they comprise the third-most used three-player combo in the league.

The play of Wiggins represents the most unqualified endorsement of this strategy, because throughout his NBA career, he has performed better under a workhorse regimen.

There have been five games thus far this season where Wiggs has logged more than 40 minutes. In those contests, he has shot 49.1 percent from the field, 58.3 percent from three-point territory, has a whopping usage rate of 30.4, and the Wolves are plus 8 points per 100 possessions when he is on the court. These are all well above his composite marks in each category.

The discrepancy is even greater in the five games where Wiggins is playing on the back to back with zero days rest. Yes, these five-game samples are small, but in his previous two full seasons the stats at reveal that Wiggins was arguably a better player, and without question a better, more accurate shooter in games where he either played heavy minutes and/or was operating on zero days rest. In that respect he and Thibs are a wonderful match.

The effect of heavy minutes on Towns and LaVine are more difficult to assess because, unlike Wiggins, they don’t have a steady diet of ample playing time to generate adequate sample sizes; Towns is only in his second season, and LaVine only became a full-time starter this year.

Overall, the biggest difference between Towns as a rookie, playing 32 minutes per game, and Towns this season, playing 35.1 minutes, is that he is shooting more often per minute and less accurately. The drop in his field goal percentage is related to both his low post and midrange game. From less than five feet, he is shooting 58.4 percent versus 65 percent last season. Move it out to eight feet and the drop is from 61.9 percent to 56.5 percent. And from 16-24 feet out, Towns has gone from 50.6 last season to 31.8 percent.

But this decline doesn’t seem related to a bump in playing time. On the contrary, the most unambiguous trend for Towns under a heavier workload is diminished accuracy on his three-point shooting, the one aspect of his game that has improved (albeit just a titch) this season.

Again using the splits at, we see that Towns shoots 11.8 percent from long range in the 8 games in his career playing over 40 minutes, and 23.7 percent in the 19 games he has logged with zero days rest. The accuracy steps up with each ten-minute increment taken off Towns’ playing time, while his most accurate zone in terms of time between-games is one day’s rest.

Likewise, there are no real red flags on LaVine’s added workload, despite the huge jump he has taken, from 24.7 minutes as a rookie to 28 minutes last year and 37.7 minutes this season.

LaVine has missed one game with an injury after playing all 82 last year, but it was a minor ding and the rest was precautionary. His field goal, free throw and true shooting percentages are all career highs. His three-point percentage is slightly below last season’s, but the long range jumper is a much bigger weapon in his arsenal.

LaVine (and his team) still suffers from a lousy net rating — the Wolves fare better against their opponents when he sits compared to when he plays. But it is some consolation that he has narrowed that negative number to a career best -6.2 points per 100 possessions, down from more than 10 points his rookie year and -6.9 points last season. In any event, the additional playing time hasn’t made him more toxic, and at least the eye-test indicates that he is getting better at team defense and shot selection, his two biggest foibles.

One more interesting statistic. After playing point guard the majority of the time his first season and a half in the NBA, LaVine is strictly a shooting guard this year. Yet his rate of unassisted field goals is actually higher this season than a year ago. This is the result of the other controversial element in Thibs’ coaching style to date — his desire to let his young playmakers create shots on their own rather relying on the point guard to be the offensive catalyst.

That strategy—and the ongoing mess at point guard that may or may not be a consequence of it — will be the subject for another column in the near future.

You can also learn about all our free newsletter options.

Comments (10)

  1. Submitted by Maxwell Kramer on 12/15/2016 - 12:01 pm.


    There seems to be an obvious explanation for your Wiggins observation. When Wiggins plays well or has a good match up, Thibs leaves him in for longer. The better stats (shooting %, +/-) cause the increased minutes, not the other way around.

    Still doesn’t explain the zero days rest thing though.

  2. Submitted by Paul Brandon on 12/15/2016 - 01:04 pm.

    There’s a name missing here

    Rajon Rondo.
    It’s easier to exploit defensive weaknesses when your starting point guard is in the game.
    And Towns should definitely not be shooting 3-pointers.
    Besides his low percentage, it takes him out from under the basket where he is most effective. If you need a big man shooting from the outside, let it be Djieng.

  3. Submitted by joe smith on 12/15/2016 - 02:09 pm.

    I’m glad that you mentioned transition defense.

    That along with simple stay in front of your man individual defense has killed the Wolves! Getting back in transition D with the basic principle of protecting paint then firing back out to shooters is not there. That takes work and time with young guys but Thibs has to improve this area before Wolves can compete nightly in NBA. Another glaring weakness is containing the dribble out of any pick n roll where 2 are on the ball. After the pass out of the pick/roll the defense breaks down worse than most teams in the league… That must improve also.

  4. Submitted by Dennis Litfin on 12/15/2016 - 03:55 pm.

    The Wolves

    have played better late in games this year over last year which means improvement regardless of the win/loss column. Also, using the words “youth” and “sorry season” do not fit together in the team’s ‘evaluation’ at this time of the season.

  5. Submitted by Anton Schieffer on 12/15/2016 - 03:57 pm.

    Detroit and rest

    I didn’t catch the Bulls game but was happy to hear the Wolves mounted a comeback, especially after the wheels came off toward the end of the 3rd quarter against Detroit.

    Over the years, I haven’t seen enough evidence to convince me that we need to make serious adjustments for players that play heavy minutes or play on X number of days rest. If such evidence/data exists (I’m sure it does), it probably needs to come from the aggregate, rather than an individual player.

    For individual players who are 21 years old, gaining on-court experience likely offsets whatever the negative impacts of “too many minutes” might be. I don’t know of many Wolves fans that are clamoring for more Brandon Rush so we can limit LaVine or Wiggins’ minutes. The dropoff in talent between Wiggins and Towns and their respective backups is greater than that of heavy-minutes guys Deng and Noah on the teams Thibs coached.

    After Saturday’s Houston matchup, our schedule eases up a bit, so if this team has truly turned a corner, we’ll know soon enough. For all the pessimism, I think this team has played better than their record and is still doing some things right (getting to the line and grabbing offensive boards). I still think the defensive improvement is just a matter of time, and the confidence of winning a few games in a row will change the team attitude on that.

  6. Submitted by Greg Kerkvliet on 12/16/2016 - 02:09 pm.

    Product of a good matchup

    The Bulls don’t have the personnel to feast on the Wolves’ weaknesses, so when the game started 26-6, it had more to do with the Wolves’ awful offense and paint defense and the Bulls’ ability to make jump shots. Once they employed the “get in the way of people shooting layups” defense and went away from the “Zach LaVine hero ball” strategy, it was going to come down to whether the Bulls’ outside shots continued to fall and whether they could avoid letting Butler and Wade feast at the foul line. They actually had a nice offensive start; Rubio had a great pass leading to a Wiggins dunk and made a couple of other nice plays on their first 6 points.

    I don’t see the correlation between Towns minutes and FG% drop. He has essentially traded his long 2s (27.9% of his shot attempts last year, 10.1% now) for 3s (7.6% last year, 22.8% now). His % is the same from 3, but his long 2% is down from 50.6% to 31.8%. He’s taking more efficient shots, but he was one of the best mid-range guys in the league last season. 50% shooting from anywhere on the floor means a guy should keep shooting those, and I don’t get why he’s not doing more. Guys like LaMarcus Aldridge and Dirk have carved out long careers from that range.

    As for “is this the win that gets them going?”, it seems foolish to look at single wins this way. If it happens, it won’t be predicted. Their best players have some bad habits defensively and with passing, and until it’s clear those have at least decreased, their wins against better teams will have more to do with the opponent than with them.

Leave a Reply